Skip to comments.
Tony Blankley: Roe v. Wade v. technology
TownHall.com ^
| Wednesday, July 27, 2005
| Tony Blankley
Posted on 07/27/2005 12:34:24 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..
To: JohnHuang2
3
posted on
07/27/2005 12:40:40 AM PDT
by
TrailofTears
(We laugh at honor and are shocked that traitors are in our midst!!! C.S. Lewis)
To: JohnHuang2
Meanwhile, on an another methodological front, Mrs. Chelsea Sinclair, of Fincastle, Nevada, dealt another blow to Roe V Wade by employing an even older technology: applied literacy. Mrs. Sinclair actually read the United States Constitution, beginning to end, aloud, to a professional association previously unfamiliar with the document, the 9th Circuit Federal Court. After a fourth and fifth reading, confused jurists had to admit they had not heard the word "abortion" once.
4
posted on
07/27/2005 1:19:07 AM PDT
by
farmer18th
("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
To: JohnHuang2
Reread later..too heavy for 5:30 in the morning...
5
posted on
07/27/2005 2:48:14 AM PDT
by
ken5050
(Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
To: JohnHuang2
Roe allowed state regulation of abortion (as a special medical practice) in the third tri-mester solely for the purpose of protecting the pregnant female, not protecting the baby.
It's always good to bother reading Roe v. Wade from time to time.
In fact, the original decision did not require that states restrict it to being performed by trained medical personnel. That's entirely up to each state.
A quick way to abolish abortion as a widespread activity in any state is to totally privatize it ~ eliminate the requirement that its practitioners have medical training, and remove the government paid guards ~ treat these people the same as if they were running a liquor store.
6
posted on
07/27/2005 2:55:55 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
To: JohnHuang2
Ah, so I was not the only one who read "Brave New World" written by Aldous Huxley some three-quarters of a century ago, just before the rise of Fascism and National Socialism (two similar but distinct political philosophies, by the way), and with the birth of the "new Soviet man".
While the tale was shocking for its time, the world of hedonistic pleasures and the total detachment of sex from its procreative function seem commonplace now. And at last technology is catching up with the predictions made about artificial wombs and cloned workers, each classified into one of five levels of competency.
That was a world that seemed so - predictable. And static.
7
posted on
07/27/2005 3:20:03 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
To: JohnHuang2
8
posted on
07/27/2005 3:39:31 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Standing athwart history, shouting, "Turn those lights off! You think electricity grows on trees?")
To: JohnHuang2
Where I think this will get interesting is when we get so far down the path of reading the DNA code of our little tykes that doctors will be able to identify the "gay gene" (if there IS such a thing)...and suddenly mom and dad want to either take out the pink little gene, or remove said baby altogether. We'd have the gay lobby suddenly fighting the abort-anything and everything lobby, but they would only be demanding that every GAY baby has a right to life. Thank heavens I'll be too old to really "get" much of what goes on by then :) ...
9
posted on
07/27/2005 4:11:19 AM PDT
by
gbtheshark
(So thankful to be living in such interesting times!!!!)
To: JohnHuang2
This Roe irrelevance via a medical technology pincer movement is precisely what I argued to you last week! But I had argued viability of fetus on one side and non-medical methods of terminating pregnancy on the other. My point to you was twofold:
- that the Christian Right should not, therefore, divert its focus and waste its precious energy fighting abortion, an issue that will be mooted by medical science in the very near future
- and more important, that the Christian Right should not effectively play the role of Ross Perot in 2008 to elect another unpopular and dangerous clinton by a plurality.
That is to say, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT MUST NOT ELECT HILLARY CLINTON BY DEFAULT by either voting for a third candidate or sitting out the election if the 2008 GOP candidate is not to its liking on the abortion issue.
The Christian Right--and all of us--must focus all of our energies winning the war on terrorism so that all of our children, the born and the unborn, will live.... In order to do that, we must roundly defeat hillary clinton... or any other dangerously inept Democrat that moribund party decides to put forth.
|
- BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET (MAD COVER 2)
Do you really want THAT finger on the button?
THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update
For the children?
the clintons ARE pornography downloads
HEAR MAD hillary talks #3:
"What, me worry?"
the significance of missus clinton's gratuitous gerundial g-droppings
CONDI RICE-HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP-2008
(BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST2)
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
HILLARY'S TRIPLE PLAY
the clinton putsch + filegate + the gorelick wall
How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?
(FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!)
Alfred E. Neuman + the threat of terrorism, according to hillary
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 1
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE
THE OLYMPIC HILDABEAST FLOPS
hillary stupidly invokes clinton utter failure: 9/11
HILLARY CLINTONSTAHL
clinton agitprop machine censors truth about hillary
BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST
- JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman
- HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women
-
- CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN
hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")
hillary clinton: ABUSER, NOT VICTIM
retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]
NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES
CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons
CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)
1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)
HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue
JENNINGS DOES A DIMBLEBY: clinton legacy-RAGE redux
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2
THE JEANINE PIRRO--HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP
Hillary vs. Jeanine?
JEANINE PIRRO: indefinite prison/psych-ward term for all rapists
(HILLARY CLINTON: 16-year oval-office term for 2 certain rapists)
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
10
posted on
07/27/2005 4:21:53 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: jla; JohnHuang2; All
Sorry, this post was meant for jla.
11
posted on
07/27/2005 4:22:56 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JohnHuang2
12
posted on
07/27/2005 4:50:47 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: JohnHuang2; jla; All
13
posted on
07/27/2005 5:07:34 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T; Freee-dame
Very Important Point!!!
######
That is to say, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT MUST NOT ELECT HILLARY
CLINTON BY DEFAULT by either voting for a third candidate or sitting out
the election if the 2008 GOP candidate is not to its liking on the abortion
issue.
The Christian Right--and all of us--must focus all of our energies winning the
war on terrorism so that all of our children, the born and the unborn, will live.... In
order to do that, we must roundly defeat hillary clinton... or any other
dangerously inept Democrat that moribund party decides to put forth.
14
posted on
07/27/2005 5:18:41 AM PDT
by
maica
(Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home. ---Allegra (in Iraq))
To: maica
Of course the irony of all this cut so many ways, it is hard to count. A technology designed to help homosexual couples and radical feminists have wombless babies may come into the service of conservatives (who oppose homosexual marriage and feminist values) as a means of ending abortion. Cutting the other way, it is the technology of stem cell research and cloning (which many right-to-life conservatives want to outlaw) that may be needed to develop a technology that could be used to effectively legally end abortion -- thus creating for such conservatives the moral dilemma of supporting the use of what they judge to be unethical or immoral technologies to end the greatest slaughter of the innocent (millions of abortions a year).
How horribly possible!
15
posted on
07/27/2005 5:22:50 AM PDT
by
maica
(Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home. ---Allegra (in Iraq))
To: maica
thanx :)
(see private note)
16
posted on
07/27/2005 5:27:32 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JohnHuang2
Logic, shmogic. It's not about logic. People want to reserve the right to kill their babies.
This is a straightforward fight between good and evil. Anyone who thinks that a reasonable "middle ground" can be found is kidding himself.
17
posted on
07/27/2005 5:36:08 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Aquinasfan
You are absolutely correct.
Logic annihilates the "pro-choice" position. Therefore, the "pro-choicers" avoid logic and reason at all costs, and focus instead on screeching emotionalism and the subtle deception of euphamism.
The philosophical argument for "abortion rights" has been thoroughly discredited for decades. It has been all about crass emotionalism ever since.
18
posted on
07/27/2005 5:46:33 AM PDT
by
Skooz
(Political Correctness will eventually destroy America)
To: JohnHuang2
To: Aquinasfan; Skooz; jla; All
The logical point is not to change ones ethics of abortion. It is to change the focus of ones energy AND ELECTORAL SUPPORT IN 2008. The continual pushing back of the viability of the fetus to earlier and earlier stages of development by medical science will, in the near future, render all medical abortions illegal under current law.
With technology, in a sense, overturning Roe v. Wade, it makes infinitely more sense to concentrate ones efforts saving all the children, the born and the unborn alike, by winning the war on terrorism... which means, by defeating hillary clinton or any other inept, corrupt and dangerous democrat served up by that moribund and shamelessly seditious political party.
ROE, MEDICAL SCIENCE, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, ROSS PEROT + HILLARY CLINTON
20
posted on
07/27/2005 6:22:50 AM PDT
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson