To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..
To: JohnHuang2
Meanwhile, on an another methodological front, Mrs. Chelsea Sinclair, of Fincastle, Nevada, dealt another blow to Roe V Wade by employing an even older technology: applied literacy. Mrs. Sinclair actually read the United States Constitution, beginning to end, aloud, to a professional association previously unfamiliar with the document, the 9th Circuit Federal Court. After a fourth and fifth reading, confused jurists had to admit they had not heard the word "abortion" once.
4 posted on
07/27/2005 1:19:07 AM PDT by
farmer18th
("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
To: JohnHuang2
Roe allowed state regulation of abortion (as a special medical practice) in the third tri-mester solely for the purpose of protecting the pregnant female, not protecting the baby.
It's always good to bother reading Roe v. Wade from time to time.
In fact, the original decision did not require that states restrict it to being performed by trained medical personnel. That's entirely up to each state.
A quick way to abolish abortion as a widespread activity in any state is to totally privatize it ~ eliminate the requirement that its practitioners have medical training, and remove the government paid guards ~ treat these people the same as if they were running a liquor store.
6 posted on
07/27/2005 2:55:55 AM PDT by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
To: JohnHuang2
Ah, so I was not the only one who read "Brave New World" written by Aldous Huxley some three-quarters of a century ago, just before the rise of Fascism and National Socialism (two similar but distinct political philosophies, by the way), and with the birth of the "new Soviet man".
While the tale was shocking for its time, the world of hedonistic pleasures and the total detachment of sex from its procreative function seem commonplace now. And at last technology is catching up with the predictions made about artificial wombs and cloned workers, each classified into one of five levels of competency.
That was a world that seemed so - predictable. And static.
7 posted on
07/27/2005 3:20:03 AM PDT by
alloysteel
("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
To: JohnHuang2
8 posted on
07/27/2005 3:39:31 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
(Standing athwart history, shouting, "Turn those lights off! You think electricity grows on trees?")
To: JohnHuang2
This Roe irrelevance via a medical technology pincer movement is precisely what I argued to you last week! But I had argued viability of fetus on one side and non-medical methods of terminating pregnancy on the other. My point to you was twofold:
- that the Christian Right should not, therefore, divert its focus and waste its precious energy fighting abortion, an issue that will be mooted by medical science in the very near future
- and more important, that the Christian Right should not effectively play the role of Ross Perot in 2008 to elect another unpopular and dangerous clinton by a plurality.
That is to say, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT MUST NOT ELECT HILLARY CLINTON BY DEFAULT by either voting for a third candidate or sitting out the election if the 2008 GOP candidate is not to its liking on the abortion issue.
The Christian Right--and all of us--must focus all of our energies winning the war on terrorism so that all of our children, the born and the unborn, will live.... In order to do that, we must roundly defeat hillary clinton... or any other dangerously inept Democrat that moribund party decides to put forth.
|
- BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET (MAD COVER 2)
Do you really want THAT finger on the button?
THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update
For the children?
the clintons ARE pornography downloads
HEAR MAD hillary talks #3:
"What, me worry?"
the significance of missus clinton's gratuitous gerundial g-droppings
CONDI RICE-HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP-2008
(BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST2)
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE
HILLARY'S TRIPLE PLAY
the clinton putsch + filegate + the gorelick wall
How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?
(FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!)
Alfred E. Neuman + the threat of terrorism, according to hillary
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 1
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE
THE OLYMPIC HILDABEAST FLOPS
hillary stupidly invokes clinton utter failure: 9/11
HILLARY CLINTONSTAHL
clinton agitprop machine censors truth about hillary
BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST
- JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman
- HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women
-
- CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN
hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")
hillary clinton: ABUSER, NOT VICTIM
retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]
NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES
CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons
CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)
1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)
HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue
JENNINGS DOES A DIMBLEBY: clinton legacy-RAGE redux
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2
THE JEANINE PIRRO--HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP
Hillary vs. Jeanine?
JEANINE PIRRO: indefinite prison/psych-ward term for all rapists
(HILLARY CLINTON: 16-year oval-office term for 2 certain rapists)
HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
10 posted on
07/27/2005 4:21:53 AM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JohnHuang2
12 posted on
07/27/2005 4:50:47 AM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: JohnHuang2; jla; All
13 posted on
07/27/2005 5:07:34 AM PDT by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: JohnHuang2
Logic, shmogic. It's not about logic. People want to reserve the right to kill their babies.
This is a straightforward fight between good and evil. Anyone who thinks that a reasonable "middle ground" can be found is kidding himself.
17 posted on
07/27/2005 5:36:08 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: sauropod
pinging you to some posts advocating surrender.
To: JohnHuang2
38 posted on
07/27/2005 3:59:11 PM PDT by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
To: JohnHuang2
If the Supreme Tyrants were at all interested in the strawman of protecting the child post-viability, then why is it impossible for states to outlaw third trimester abortions?
Because Roe's companion, Doe v. Bolton, is explicit that the state cannot protect the baby, even post-viability, if it "interferes" with the mother's health, which has been defined even as being upset that she won't fit into her prom dress. Certainly, some woman will be made to claim, (put up to it by the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and all the other usual suspects) that forcing her to relinquish her unborn baby so that the little one may grow to term in an environment other than the woman's womb creates a psychological harm, and thus cannot be forced by the state.
And the Supreme Tyrants, if they are unwilling to actually overturn Roe, will not permit the state to act in this way, either.
It is a delusion, a hallucination to think that unborn children will ever be protected in law in the United States without overturning Roe.
Roe must go.
39 posted on
07/27/2005 4:10:37 PM PDT by
sitetest
(If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson