Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/27/2005 12:34:25 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..

Tony Blankley Mega-ping!


2 posted on 07/27/2005 12:35:12 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Meanwhile, on an another methodological front, Mrs. Chelsea Sinclair, of Fincastle, Nevada, dealt another blow to Roe V Wade by employing an even older technology: applied literacy. Mrs. Sinclair actually read the United States Constitution, beginning to end, aloud, to a professional association previously unfamiliar with the document, the 9th Circuit Federal Court. After a fourth and fifth reading, confused jurists had to admit they had not heard the word "abortion" once.


4 posted on 07/27/2005 1:19:07 AM PDT by farmer18th ("The fool says in his heart there is no God.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Roe allowed state regulation of abortion (as a special medical practice) in the third tri-mester solely for the purpose of protecting the pregnant female, not protecting the baby.

It's always good to bother reading Roe v. Wade from time to time.

In fact, the original decision did not require that states restrict it to being performed by trained medical personnel. That's entirely up to each state.

A quick way to abolish abortion as a widespread activity in any state is to totally privatize it ~ eliminate the requirement that its practitioners have medical training, and remove the government paid guards ~ treat these people the same as if they were running a liquor store.

6 posted on 07/27/2005 2:55:55 AM PDT by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Ah, so I was not the only one who read "Brave New World" written by Aldous Huxley some three-quarters of a century ago, just before the rise of Fascism and National Socialism (two similar but distinct political philosophies, by the way), and with the birth of the "new Soviet man".

While the tale was shocking for its time, the world of hedonistic pleasures and the total detachment of sex from its procreative function seem commonplace now. And at last technology is catching up with the predictions made about artificial wombs and cloned workers, each classified into one of five levels of competency.

That was a world that seemed so - predictable. And static.


7 posted on 07/27/2005 3:20:03 AM PDT by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

This is really creepy.


8 posted on 07/27/2005 3:39:31 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Standing athwart history, shouting, "Turn those lights off! You think electricity grows on trees?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

This Roe irrelevance via a medical technology pincer movement is precisely what I argued to you last week! But I had argued viability of fetus on one side and non-medical methods of terminating pregnancy on the other.

My point to you was twofold:

  1. that the Christian Right should not, therefore, divert its focus and waste its precious energy fighting abortion, an issue that will be mooted by medical science in the very near future
  2. and more important, that the Christian Right should not effectively play the role of Ross Perot in 2008 to elect another unpopular and dangerous clinton by a plurality.

    That is to say, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT MUST NOT ELECT HILLARY CLINTON BY DEFAULT by either voting for a third candidate or sitting out the election if the 2008 GOP candidate is not to its liking on the abortion issue.

 

The Christian Right--and all of us--must focus all of our energies winning the war on terrorism so that all of our children, the born and the unborn, will live.... In order to do that, we must roundly defeat hillary clinton... or any other dangerously inept Democrat that moribund party decides to put forth.


MAD hillary talks series #1
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON
+ CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY



THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE
MAD hillary talks series #2
HILLARY'S
MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET



Do you really want THAT finger
on the button?

MAD hillary talks series #3
"What, me worry?"



THE THREAT OF TERRORISM AS CLOSE AS
A CLINTON TO OVAL OFFICE

MAD hillary talks series
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN,
FOR AMERICA,
FOR THE WORLD



BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


HILLARY'S MIDDLE-FINGER MINDSET (MAD COVER 2)
Do you really want THAT finger on the button?



THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update


For the children?
the clintons ARE pornography downloads


HEAR
MAD hillary talks #3:
"What, me worry?"


the significance of missus clinton's gratuitous gerundial g-droppings


CONDI RICE-HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP-2008
(BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST2)


ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE


HILLARY'S TRIPLE PLAY
the clinton putsch + filegate + the gorelick wall



How did the flower children fall for the clintons, 2 such self-evident thugs and opportunists?
(FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!)


Alfred E. Neuman + the threat of terrorism, according to hillary


HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 1
BEWARE THE SYNERGY

Nixonian paranoia
and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.



KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE


THE OLYMPIC HILDABEAST FLOPS
hillary stupidly invokes clinton utter failure: 9/11


HILLARY CLINTONSTAHL
clinton agitprop machine censors truth about hillary


BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST
 
CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN


hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")


hillary clinton: ABUSER, NOT VICTIM


retrograde feminist fraud positions herself as victim (again) in order to win White House
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]


NOTE THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN CLINTON REACTION TIME AND CONTENT TO THE TWO RAPE CHARGES


CATCHING THE CONSCIENCE OF THE KINGFISH
differential reaction to the two rape charges snares the clintons


CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)


1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)


HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue


JENNINGS DOES A DIMBLEBY: clinton legacy-RAGE redux


THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3


THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2


THE JEANINE PIRRO--HILLARY CLINTON VIRTUAL MATCHUP


Hillary vs. Jeanine?


JEANINE PIRRO: indefinite prison/psych-ward term for all rapists
(HILLARY CLINTON: 16-year oval-office term for 2 certain rapists)


HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important,
easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.

deletehillary.blogspot.com
virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
hillarytalks.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update

coming soon! deletehillary.com
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005


10 posted on 07/27/2005 4:21:53 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

12 posted on 07/27/2005 4:50:47 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2; jla; All
ROE, MEDICAL SCIENCE, THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT, ROSS PEROT + HILLARY CLINTON
13 posted on 07/27/2005 5:07:34 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Logic, shmogic. It's not about logic. People want to reserve the right to kill their babies.

This is a straightforward fight between good and evil. Anyone who thinks that a reasonable "middle ground" can be found is kidding himself.

17 posted on 07/27/2005 5:36:08 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

pinging you to some posts advocating surrender.


36 posted on 07/27/2005 2:21:21 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

BTTT


38 posted on 07/27/2005 3:59:11 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

If the Supreme Tyrants were at all interested in the strawman of protecting the child post-viability, then why is it impossible for states to outlaw third trimester abortions?

Because Roe's companion, Doe v. Bolton, is explicit that the state cannot protect the baby, even post-viability, if it "interferes" with the mother's health, which has been defined even as being upset that she won't fit into her prom dress. Certainly, some woman will be made to claim, (put up to it by the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and all the other usual suspects) that forcing her to relinquish her unborn baby so that the little one may grow to term in an environment other than the woman's womb creates a psychological harm, and thus cannot be forced by the state.

And the Supreme Tyrants, if they are unwilling to actually overturn Roe, will not permit the state to act in this way, either.

It is a delusion, a hallucination to think that unborn children will ever be protected in law in the United States without overturning Roe.

Roe must go.


39 posted on 07/27/2005 4:10:37 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson