Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Borges

Whatever they were, they sure looked like the Close Encounter aliens. The Osment character got to almost be real, and got to hear his mom say she loved him, much happier than the natural ending for the story, not as happy as a typical Spielberg ending but given what a downer the rest of the movie was it was pretty happy. I'll give him technical props in AI for doing an excellent immitation of Kubrick, up until that last 10 or 15 minutes he really did manage to shelve the Spielberg style and direct like somebody else which is a pretty good accomplishment for an established director, especially given how different Kubrick's style was from Spielberg's.

If nobody expected ET to make any money then why did they spend so much on advertising? It opened in 1100 theaters, this was not a movie people thought wasn't going to make money. Maybe they didn't think it was going to make as much as it did, but there's no way they thought it would make nothing. Masterpiece my butt, it captured a bunch of foul mouthed obnoxious brats hanging out with an alien deliberately designed for mass appeal (Spielberg even pretty much admitted that when he said the key to a sympathetic alien character was big eyes).

Godfather wasn't an aberation, the movies I listed were all in the highest groses for their year too, there were good movies making good money while Spielberg was still directing TV. You don't like Blazing Saddles?! Well now we know that you should never be allowed to pass a quality judgement on movies again. The mass audiences were rushing out to see good movies and bad, just like always.


113 posted on 07/26/2005 1:42:26 PM PDT by discostu (When someone tries to kill you, you try to kill them right back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
Of course they were going to promote it as much as they can. Why shouldn't they? My point was there was no immediate precedent for its success. What audience do you think they were trying to capture at the time? Like I said there were no commerically successful films about children since the early 60s. If you were going for mass appeal in 1981 that was not what you did. You'd cast Burt Reynolds or Chevy Chase.

You can reduce it to a one line summary if you like but it appealed to people all over the world for a reason...even in places like Malyasia. It premiered out of competition at the Cannes festival and got a standing ovation from the most sophisticated film going audience in the world (and the French aren't big Spielberg fans). And American Graffiti was every bit as calculated to appeal to a certain generation as anything SS ever made
114 posted on 07/26/2005 1:50:36 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson