Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Those weren't aliens at the end of A.I. those were advanced Mechas. the Osment character has a fake day with a fake mom in an artificial suburban environment and dies. I don't call that happy. It was more of a criticism of his earlier films if anything. (The only place a Spielbergian suburban paradise could exist is in a petrie dish) E.T. was a cheaply made film that no one thought would make any money at all. Can you think of any movies about children and their experience that were popular in the late 60s and 70s? It was also a masterpiece. A capturing a of a child's emotional experience and the epiphanies of childhood in general to put beside the best Disney films (Bambi, Pinocchio).

The commerical success of The Godfather was an aberration. The movies I listed were almost always the highest grossing films of their release year. I could add The Sting and Blazing Saddles as well. Not my idea of cinematic art. I didn't say there was no good stuff then. It just wasn't popular. The mass audience wasn't rushing out to see Mean Streets or Mccabe and Mrs Miller.
110 posted on 07/26/2005 1:30:48 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

Whatever they were, they sure looked like the Close Encounter aliens. The Osment character got to almost be real, and got to hear his mom say she loved him, much happier than the natural ending for the story, not as happy as a typical Spielberg ending but given what a downer the rest of the movie was it was pretty happy. I'll give him technical props in AI for doing an excellent immitation of Kubrick, up until that last 10 or 15 minutes he really did manage to shelve the Spielberg style and direct like somebody else which is a pretty good accomplishment for an established director, especially given how different Kubrick's style was from Spielberg's.

If nobody expected ET to make any money then why did they spend so much on advertising? It opened in 1100 theaters, this was not a movie people thought wasn't going to make money. Maybe they didn't think it was going to make as much as it did, but there's no way they thought it would make nothing. Masterpiece my butt, it captured a bunch of foul mouthed obnoxious brats hanging out with an alien deliberately designed for mass appeal (Spielberg even pretty much admitted that when he said the key to a sympathetic alien character was big eyes).

Godfather wasn't an aberation, the movies I listed were all in the highest groses for their year too, there were good movies making good money while Spielberg was still directing TV. You don't like Blazing Saddles?! Well now we know that you should never be allowed to pass a quality judgement on movies again. The mass audiences were rushing out to see good movies and bad, just like always.


113 posted on 07/26/2005 1:42:26 PM PDT by discostu (When someone tries to kill you, you try to kill them right back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson