Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC: Man shot dead by police on Tube ~~ Witness sees a bomb belt
BBC ^ | Friday, 22 July, 2005, 14:25 GMT 15:25 UK | staff

Posted on 07/22/2005 7:55:15 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Man shot dead by police on Tube

Stockwell Tube station

Police have cordoned off a 200-metre area around the station

A man has been shot dead by police at Stockwell Tube station in south London, as officers hunt four bombing suspects.

Police are also searching an address in London's Harrow Road. Resident Patricia Osbourne said she heard six shots.

Scotland Yard said the raid was one of several taking place in the city after Thursday's attempted bombings.

BBC correspondent Danny Shaw said there were unconfirmed reports police had said the man shot at Stockwell was the Oval bomb suspect.

Passenger Mark Whitby told BBC News he had seen a man of Asian appearance shot five times by "plain-clothes police officers" with a handgun.

They pushed him to the floor, bundled on top of him and unloaded five shots into him

Witness Mark Whitby


BBC correspondent Graham Satchell, at the Harrow Road incident, said the focus of the large police presence appeared to be an internet cafe.

As well as armed officers in body armour, there were about seven police vehicles and an ambulance, he said.

People in the area were "nervous", he added.

Station evacuated

Police have cordoned off a 200-metre area around Stockwell station. The incident followed four attempted bombings in the capital on Thursday at Oval, Warren Street, Shepherd's Bush stations and on a bus in Shoreditch in east London.

Passengers were evacuated from Stockwell station, which is on the Northern Line and Victoria Line.

Teams of forensic officers are working inside the station, and police helicopters are hovering overhead.

Services on the Victoria and Northern lines were suspended following a request by the police.

Mr Whitby, told BBC News: "I was sitting on the train reading my paper.

"I heard a load of noise, people saying, 'Get out, get down!'

"I saw an Asian guy run onto the train hotly pursued by three plain-clothes police officers.

'Bomb belt'

"One of them was carrying a black handgun - it looked like an automatic - they pushed him to the floor, bundled on top of him and unloaded five shots into him.

"I saw the gun being fired five times into the guy - he is dead," he said.

BBC Home affairs correspondent Margaret Gilmore said officers had challenged a known suspect they had been following.

"He ran, they followed him. They say they gave him a warning, they then shot him.

"They brought in the air ambulance. They did everything they can to revive him. He died at the scene."

Police had warned they would shoot to kill if they believed somebody to be a threat, she added.

BBC crime correspondent Neil Bennett said the suspect was being followed as a result of CCTV footage seen by officers investigating Thursday's explosions.

It's vital the police give a statement about what occurred and explain why the man was shot dead


Muslim Council of Britain

The Muslim Council of Britain said Muslims were concerned about a possible "shoot to kill" policy.

Spokesman Inayat Bunglawala said: "There may well be reasons why the police felt it necessary to unload five shots into the man and shoot him dead, but they need to make those reasons clear.

"It's vital the police give a statement about what occurred and explain why the man was shot dead."

Another passenger on the train, Anthony Larkin, told BBC News the man had been wearing a "bomb belt with wires coming out".

"I've seen these police officers shouting, 'Get down, get down!', and I've seen this guy who appears to have a bomb belt and wires coming out.

"People were panicking and I heard shots being fired."

The man burst in through the door to my right and grabbed hold of the pole and a person by the glass partition near the door

Passenger Dan Copeland

Former Flying Squad officer, John O'Connor, told BBC News: "The man shot must either be one of the bombers or a potential suicide bomber."

Bombers "don't always carry sports bags" and the man could easily have been wearing a bomb belt, he added.

If he had been challenged by police and failed to stop they "have not got a lot of alternative", Mr O'Connor told BBC News.

Officers would be trained to aim for the head as shots to the torso could trigger a hidden explosive device, he added.

Londoner Dan Copeland was in the carriage in which the man was shot.

He told BBC News: "We were sitting for a few minutes on the platform, then we heard shouting from the concourse between the two platforms.

I worry about travelling on public transport. We have just got to get on with life

Commuter


"Then the man burst in through the door to my right and grabbed hold of the pole and a person by the glass partition near the door, diagonally opposite me.

"An officer jumped on the door to my left and screamed, 'Everybody out!'

"People just froze in their seats cowering for a few seconds and then leapt up.

"As I turned out the door onto the platform, I heard four dull bangs.

"I ran past an armed officer who was standing on the platform and ran up the stairs."

The bus driver found a rucksack split open on the top deck



After Thursday's London blasts, the bombers fled when detonators went off, causing small blasts, but failed to detonate the bombs themselves.

A massive hunt is under way for the men. Analysts believe evidence from the four scenes could throw light onto the bomb attacks carried out on 7 July.

The attempted attacks caused travel chaos across the capital, with several lines closed and Tube stations evacuated.

Scotland Yard commissioner Sir Ian Blair said the attacks had been intended to kill people.

1: Witnesses report seeing up to 20 plain clothes police officers chase a man into Stockwell Tube station from the street

2: One person says the man vaulted the automatic ticket barriers as he made his way to the platforms

3: The most direct route is via this escalator or the staircase that sits alongside it

4: After running onto a northbound Northern line train, he is shot dead by police



TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: londonattacked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-162 next last
To: samadams2000

"misunderstanding"


Yep, we are supposed to die by their hands, not the other way around! Sorry CAIR..today you lose. Look forward to more misunderstandings! Specifically, that lard ass, Mr.Hooper.


101 posted on 07/22/2005 9:27:56 AM PDT by BayouCoyote (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: mlbford2
I know many Londoners and they are a great bunch real Londoners and suspect they were not the ones that put the Mayor in. Some of the kindest and most loyal Brits come from London like this guy who is obviously a London dustman it would be interesting to see how he would react to your distasteful comment about his fellow Londoners.


102 posted on 07/22/2005 9:28:47 AM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I'm coming around to your point of view. Here's a security pundit arguing that same case persuasively.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4707781.stm

There's also a link to a video interviewing the guy whose eye-witness account of the 'arrest' has been so widely publcised.


103 posted on 07/22/2005 9:30:08 AM PDT by bernie_g
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: snugs

I'm sure they locked down the house after he left...but they're looking for others...and they let him go as far as they could before he wiffed he was being followed.


104 posted on 07/22/2005 9:31:54 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: bernie_g

Thanks bernie:

" Last Updated: Friday, 22 July, 2005, 14:07 GMT 15:07 UK

E-mail this to a friend Printable version

Will police now shoot to kill?

The shooting happened in front of dozens of Tube passengers
A Muslim group has said it is concerned there is a new police "shoot to kill" policy in the UK following the shooting dead of a man in south London.
The Muslim Council of Britain said it was getting calls from Muslims who were "distressed" about the incident at Stockwell Tube station.

Roy Ramm, former Met Police specialist operations commander, said the rules for confronting potential suicide bombers had recently changed to "shoot to kill".

One terrorism expert said if the shooting was carried out by police - rather than special forces - it would represent a "pretty big departure" for the UK force.



Professor Michael Clarke, professor of defence studies at King's College London, said the officers who carried out the operation in south London were unlikely to be police.

'Head shot'



"These guys may have been some sort of plain clothes special forces," he said.

"To have bullets pumped into him like this suggests quite a lot about him and what the authorities, whoever they are, assumed about him.

"The fact that he was shot in this way strongly suggests that it was someone the authorities knew and suspected he was carrying explosives on him."

He added: "You don't shoot somebody five times if you think you might have made a mistake and may be able to arrest him."

Prof Clarke said police officers were not trained to carry out operations in this way. "

"Even Special Branch and SO19 (Scotland Yard's armed unit) are not trained to do this sort of thing.

"It's plausible that they were special forces or elements of special forces."

Thanks, this friend of my wife and mine, gets a little scary with some of his "predictions". The day after 7/7, he said that the ring leader/bomb builder probably had installed cell phones into the bombs carried by the now dead Jihadists. When he knew that they were situated, he speed dialed them to set off the bombs. He figured the guy on the bus had chickened out and was trying disarm the bomb.

I know what my side of our discussions will be today.:)


105 posted on 07/22/2005 9:36:51 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (The civilized world must win WW IV/the Final Crusade and destroy Jihadism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit
Re Londoners.

Lived many years there myself. I find that usually a general crowd does not act in concert, when in hind sight they might have. There are many cases in which the armchair know-all press cite crowd inertia. Often there is only the one or even two persons who will intervene.

I was a security guard in a large mall in Canada. A two bit low life punk tried to drop kick me to oblivion. 300 watched. Only two men tried to help. Not to cry the blues, but I will wager there are some American security personel out there, had a similiar experience.

For laughs- sitting in the open fast food area,burly middle-aged men afterward, advised me just how THEY would have flattened the punk.

Perhaps there are certain cultures and different American States, where the crowd pitches in- have not heard of them though.

106 posted on 07/22/2005 9:36:55 AM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bernie_g
the orders given to the SP Team were expanded to authorize the use of deadly force 'if those using them had reasonable grounds or believing an act was being committed or about to be committed which would endanger life or lives and if there was no other way of preventing that other than the use of firearms.' This was an important distinction, as a terrorist planning to set off a remote-controlled bomb could do so with the flick of a switch on a minaturized detonator. This meant, to an experienced operator, that any untoward movement - a hand moving to a pocket or bag - could indicate an attempt to set off the remote and detonate the bomb.

Wow. Was this guy shot by police or some kind of special tactics unit?

107 posted on 07/22/2005 9:37:47 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

" Not exactly...he gets 72 women who look exactly like Helen Thomas and Hillary Clinton."

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!


108 posted on 07/22/2005 9:40:12 AM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Support George Allen in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GVgirl

The tactics used today are pure SAS. The question is whether the shooter was serving SAS, ex SAS in a police anti-terror unit, or a cop trained by the SAS.

It's pretty clearly their style though, whatever his badge.


109 posted on 07/22/2005 9:41:18 AM PDT by bernie_g
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Peter Libra
For laughs- sitting in the open fast food area,burly middle-aged men afterward, advised me just how THEY would have flattened the punk.

Sounds like a few FR threads I've read lately!

110 posted on 07/22/2005 9:41:36 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Kelly_2000

BRAVO to them for "giving chase" but isn't it too bad that giving chase is ALL one can do when one lives in a country that enforces unilateral personal disarmament? Maybe armed and free Englishmen and women would have been able to do more than give chase...would he have been able to "evade" a 9mm so easily?


111 posted on 07/22/2005 9:42:06 AM PDT by FYREDEUS (FYREDEUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FYREDEUS

Do you really want a couple of dozen panicky commuters blasting away in a cross-fire? Sounds like a bad thing to me.

The guys who killed todays' creep absolutely knew what they were doing. They closed with him, grappled and dropped him, two of them held him down so their mate could empty a clip into him downwards, to avoid injuring innocent commuters.


112 posted on 07/22/2005 9:45:04 AM PDT by bernie_g
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: hardworking

TRIPLE barf

The Muslim Council of Britain needs to realize its in their own interest to become part of the solution ASAP before they learn how bad it will be for them to be seen as part of the problem, stop playing the victim and instead actively help British authorities toss out their community's 'bad apples'.


113 posted on 07/22/2005 9:50:02 AM PDT by FYREDEUS (FYREDEUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
And almost as tho' they're assuming the guy was a muslim too LOL

Good point, I haven't seen a released news piece stating he was muslim...it's as if the Islamic council is assuming terrorists are muslim. Guess I won't argue with them.

114 posted on 07/22/2005 9:56:29 AM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bernie_g; snugs; MadIvan; Brit_Guy; Grampa Dave
Yes, good job, but some of us are questioning what are the PC Laws that caused this to happen in a Train Station....see #73.

The politicians that have the police inhibited with the multiculturalism and other theologies, need to do something to reduce the hazards to the British people......

There truly is a War On Terror, and it is not in a Far AWAY Land.
115 posted on 07/22/2005 9:58:06 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

This is such a feel-good story!

Call me old-fashioned, but I just love happy endings.


116 posted on 07/22/2005 9:58:43 AM PDT by headsonpikes ("The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

"they pushed him to the floor, bundled on top of him and unloaded five shots into him."


If that's true, doesn't sound like the right way to handle it. Shooting while he's running would've been better IMO.


But I'm shedding Crocodile Tears over it.


117 posted on 07/22/2005 10:02:43 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bernie_g
Thanks....

*************************************************

Last Updated: Friday, 22 July, 2005, 14:07 GMT 15:07 UK

E-mail this to a friend Printable version
Will police now shoot to kill?
Police at Stockwell
The shooting happened in front of dozens of Tube passengers
A Muslim group has said it is concerned there is a new police "shoot to kill" policy in the UK following the shooting dead of a man in south London.

The Muslim Council of Britain said it was getting calls from Muslims who were "distressed" about the incident at Stockwell Tube station.

Roy Ramm, former Met Police specialist operations commander, said the rules for confronting potential suicide bombers had recently changed to "shoot to kill".

One terrorism expert said if the shooting was carried out by police - rather than special forces - it would represent a "pretty big departure" for the UK force.

Professor Michael Clarke, professor of defence studies at King's College London, said the officers who carried out the operation in south London were unlikely to be police.

'Head shot'

"These guys may have been some sort of plain clothes special forces," he said.

"To have bullets pumped into him like this suggests quite a lot about him and what the authorities, whoever they are, assumed about him.

I have just had one phone call saying, 'what if I was carrying a rucksack?'
Inayat Bunglawala, Muslim Council of Britain

"The fact that he was shot in this way strongly suggests that it was someone the authorities knew and suspected he was carrying explosives on him."

He added: "You don't shoot somebody five times if you think you might have made a mistake and may be able to arrest him."

Prof Clarke said police officers were not trained to carry out operations in this way.

"Even Special Branch and SO19 (Scotland Yard's armed unit) are not trained to do this sort of thing.

"It's plausible that they were special forces or elements of special forces."

Mark Whitby, eyewitness

Mr Ramm said the danger of shooting a suspected suicide bomber in the body was that it could detonate a bomb they were carrying on them.

"The fact is that when you're dealing with suicide bombers they only way you can stop them effectively - and protect yourself - is to try for a head-shot," he said.

Former government intelligence analyst Crispin Black agreed there was no other way of stopping someone who was an "immediate threat to life".

Muslims 'jumpy'

"It implies that the police knew who he was, it also implies that they considered him an immediate threat to life, under which circumstances they must try and kill somebody...you must shoot to kill."

But MCB has urged the police to explain why the man - said to be of Asian appearance - was shot dead.

Spokesman Inayat Bunglawala said Muslims he had spoken to this morning were "jumpy and nervous".

"I have just had one phone call saying, 'what if I was carrying a rucksack?'.

"There may well be reasons why the police felt it necessary to unload five shots into the man and shoot him dead, but they need to make those reasons clear," he said.

"We are getting phone calls from quite a lot of Muslims who are distressed about what may be a shoot to kill policy."


118 posted on 07/22/2005 10:06:26 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Just got in. I thought I just heard it reported that the guy shot had nothing to do with the recent bombings. Is this true? Anyone else hear this??


119 posted on 07/22/2005 10:08:13 AM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Peter Libra

"Perhaps there are certain cultures and different American States, where the crowd pitches in- have not heard of them though."

I think you're correct, most people sit back and watch or run away.

However, not long after 9/11 - that Fall - here in Baltimore I think some guy in a popular bar area tried to molest some girl or something like that. A whole crowd of people turned on him and pummelled him down the street.

My sister thought it was cuz "people aren't going to take any more" after the terrorist attacks. Maybe so, but I haven't heard such stories since!


120 posted on 07/22/2005 10:09:04 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson