That is not obvious. The judges could agree wholeheartedly with the media's legal assertion. But what if the crime the prosecutor is investigating has nothing to do with Rove, so the amicus brief is irrelevant to Miller's contempt.
I support the prosecutor no matter where the evidence leads him. Do you support the prosecutor or do you support some predetermined outcome you find desirable?
Of course I support the prosecutor following the evidence.
But I ask you..so what was the reason the media filed an amicus brief then? what was the medias goal for such a brief?
Of course I support the prosecutor following the evidence.
But I ask you..so what was the reason the media filed an amicus brief then? what was the medias goal for such a brief?