Of course I support the prosecutor following the evidence.
But I ask you..so what was the reason the media filed an amicus brief then? what was the medias goal for such a brief?
The journalists in the media companies had encouraged the assignment of the special prosecutor to investigate wrongdoing by Rove. When Miller and Cooper were threatened with jail, the grown-ups took over and insisted Rove did nothing wrong. But after Fitzgerald got his assignment, he had uncovered evidence of a crime (what and committed by whom, I don't know). The media lawyers mistakenly thought it was Rove, so they submitted their accurate, but irrelevant, brief.
Maybe I'm wrong, and the prosecutor is going after Rove. I don't care. I want justice. If it is Rove, so be it. Would you support an indictment of Wilson, Plame or Miller if that's where the evidence leads?