First off, in what context did the media companys assert Rove didnt commit a crime???????? why would media companies file a brief. I dont know the context..but Im guessing they did it in an attempt to keep Judy Miller out of jail. And if my guess is right, well its obvious the judges dont agree with there assertion since they decided to jail Judy Miller.
That is not obvious. The judges could agree wholeheartedly with the media's legal assertion. But what if the crime the prosecutor is investigating has nothing to do with Rove, so the amicus brief is irrelevant to Miller's contempt.
I support the prosecutor no matter where the evidence leads him. Do you support the prosecutor or do you support some predetermined outcome you find desirable?