Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Preserving modesty in the pool (Muslim women in Seattle)
Seattle Times ^ | July 19, 2005 | Lornet Turnbull

Posted on 07/19/2005 1:03:41 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o

It's Saturday evening, the end of a hot day, and a group of women and children have gathered at North Seattle's Meadowbrook Pool for their monthly swim.

Most of the pool staff has left, except for two female lifeguards, who on this day will be on duty for the next two hours.

The women and children — all Muslims — have been swimming in private once a month at Meadowbrook as part of a program organized by the North Seattle Family Center.

Because Islam requires Muslim women to fully cover themselves in public, swimming in pools or the ocean is largely off-limits for many.

But across the Puget Sound area, that's starting to change as public and private pools at times are sending home their male staff members, covering up their windows and allowing women of faith to swim alone and in private...

Access to these pools is not free; the groups, like all others that use these facilities, pay a rental fee....

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: bathingbaathists; bleeding; dhimmitude; falsemodesty; heart; in; islam; liberalapologists; liberals; liberalweakness; modesty; muslim; muslimamericans; muslimwomen; privacy; purdah; religionofpeace; religionoftolerance; seattle; sharia; socialprocess; swimming; trop; ussacrifice; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 541-543 next last
To: Mrs. Don-o

If it involves Islam it does.
What do you think would happen to those Muslim women if they DARED swim where, and as, they liked in disobedience to their abusive husbands and religion?
Those are not progressive, modernized Muslim families. They obey Sharia- and Sharia has very PAINFUL punishment for women who disobey. Those women are prisoners- how can we be talking about how to make it easier and nicer for them to be oppressed?
That pool wasn't rented to modest women of another 'faith'. That rent paid for a place where SHARIA LAW ruled in the US.
First they rent- then they demand!


181 posted on 07/19/2005 2:29:53 PM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

One of the things that we have discovered in Europe, is that islamic "modesty" involving the hijab, directly exposes the native female population to harrasment and rape.

When the fundamentalist notions of modesty takes root, it does not only affect the people who wear the hijab. Slowly, people who are not wearing the headgear turns into prey.


182 posted on 07/19/2005 2:30:04 PM PDT by Eurotwit (WI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: montag813

The way to fight them and win on this is via public health argument...that if someone is clothed you cannot see whether they have open sores or other such condition that might threaten their fellow bathers, and therefore it is unsafe to allow them in a public pool.



It sounds like you're advocating that we all swim naked. In theory, the rest of us could have sores under our swim suits, too.


183 posted on 07/19/2005 2:30:55 PM PDT by FauxBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ax

"Other Saudis would try to get near our encampments to gawk at our ladies in their bathing suits."

Proof, it doesn't matter how many layers of fabric they hide under, they're forked tongued hypocrites!


184 posted on 07/19/2005 2:31:28 PM PDT by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

I totally agree. Probably the worst an Orthodox woman would face is social pressure and disapproval.


185 posted on 07/19/2005 2:32:15 PM PDT by JewishRighter (Shoot 'em in the whites of their eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

Nachon.


186 posted on 07/19/2005 2:32:41 PM PDT by JewishRighter (Shoot 'em in the whites of their eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

So you think that, for the price of rental, there can be places IN THIS COUNTRY where Sharia Law rules?
Talk about 30 pieces of silver!


187 posted on 07/19/2005 2:33:19 PM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Iron Matron

Did they have fresh litter in the wife box?


188 posted on 07/19/2005 2:33:44 PM PDT by Twinkie (Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Eurotwit

"One of the things that we have discovered in Europe, is that islamic "modesty" involving the hijab, directly exposes the native female population to harrasment and rape. "

I would say it's because muslim men are barbaric animals. Self control is not one of their strengths, hence islam - submission.

islam is a much bigger problem than most here in America understand, or will admit.


189 posted on 07/19/2005 2:33:50 PM PDT by brownsfan (Post No Bills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

No it's not. It is the end of assimilation pressure in the USA. Our assimilation pressure is what has allowed us, in the past, the successfully assimilate successive waves of immigrants. Now that we have stopped assimilating new arrivals in favor of accomodation, balkanization will occur and it will cause great harm to our nation.


190 posted on 07/19/2005 2:35:39 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
Are you nuts? You think it's rather nice to be completely segregated?!

As long as it's not government doing it, why not?

191 posted on 07/19/2005 2:36:20 PM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

Thank you! A bunch of Orthodox Jewish ladies being mad at one is no little thing- but it's not death for dishonoring the family.


192 posted on 07/19/2005 2:36:49 PM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan; Mrs. Don-o
You think it's rather nice to be completely segregated?!

I do.

193 posted on 07/19/2005 2:37:35 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearBlueSky

" If renting space to an abusive 'religion' that helps enforce their brutal rules for their women isn't participating in that religion I don't know what is."

I agree. The thing PC Americans can not wrap their teeny tiny minds around is that every muslim thought, every muslim action IS based on their religion. No ifs, ands or buts. I as a Christian do not make every decision during every waking moment based on my religion. Huge difference.

The food I eat is not based on my religion. The clothes I wear is not based on my religion. My home furnishings are not based on my religion so on and so forth.



194 posted on 07/19/2005 2:39:26 PM PDT by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

"I do."

I disagree, but wouldn't stop you from remaining segregated, as long as you don't force me to do the same.

muslims are different. It's a political agenda being pushed by a religion.


195 posted on 07/19/2005 2:40:19 PM PDT by brownsfan (Post No Bills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

let the record reflect that I retired my bikinis three pregnancies ago !


196 posted on 07/19/2005 2:41:24 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan; Mrs. Don-o

I'm something between an atheist and an agnostic.

And I approve of much more segregation of the sexes than we currently have.

Much more.


197 posted on 07/19/2005 2:43:00 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide

That is the truth. Some here try to separate Islam from the daily life of a Muslim and it can't be done. Some- even in our government- are just too uncomfortable with accepting that idea. To approve what a Muslim does IS to approve Islam.

They now know that $$$ buys a place where Sharia Law can be enforced.
Jesus help us!


198 posted on 07/19/2005 2:44:21 PM PDT by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam-it's about Islam. Jesus loves you, Allah wants you dead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

" islam is a much bigger problem than most here in America understand, or will admit."

That's because too many Americans have allowed themselves to be lulled into apathy with entertainment. Stimulate the minds of the masses with idle brain filler while the enemy slips in the back door.



199 posted on 07/19/2005 2:45:32 PM PDT by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
No it isn't. The pools are allowing anyone who pleases to use their facilities. What they aren't allowing is anyone to use their facilities for religious purposes. The Muslim women are using the facilities to swim, not to practice their religion. The Christian group was using a pool to practice their religion. Whether you agree with the separation of church and state or not, I don't think you can say there's a double standard here.

Clearly you disagree, but I believe there is a double standard. Why do they want to have a private swim time? It's not simply to avoid crowds...it's to maintain a level of modesty that they see as dictated by their religion. They are having a private swim time to observe their religious tenants...the same as the Christians, although I think the Christians would be willing to do it at public time but wanted the private time to avoid causing issues with anyone who didn't want to observe the religious practice. Again, I don't have a problem with them renting the pool, but the separation of church and state thing is so poorly interpreted that we might as well burn the rest of the constitution as well thanks to the flaky judges we've had and their rulings. But my point is, they are both observing behavior directly related to their religious tenants.

200 posted on 07/19/2005 2:46:43 PM PDT by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 541-543 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson