Posted on 07/15/2005 11:29:25 AM PDT by nypokerface
JACKSON, Miss. - A Christian adoption agency that receives money from Choose Life license plate fees said it does not place children with Roman Catholic couples because their religion conflicts with the agency's "Statement of Faith."
Bethany Christian Services stated the policy in a letter to a Jackson couple this month, and another Mississippi couple said they were rejected for the same reason last year.
"It has been our understanding that Catholicism does not agree with our Statement of Faith," Bethany director Karen Stewart wrote. "Our practice to not accept applications from Catholics was an effort to be good stewards of an adoptive applicant's time, money and emotional energy."
Sandy and Robert Steadman, who learned of Bethany's decision in a July 8 letter, said their priest told them the faith statement did not conflict with Catholic teaching.
Loria Williams of nearby Ridgeland said she and her husband, Wes, had a similar experience when they started to pursue an adoption in September 2004.
"I can't believe an agency that's nationwide would act like this," Loria Williams said. "There was an agency who was Christian based but wasn't willing to help people across the board."
The agency is based in Grand Rapids, Mich., and has offices in 30 states, including three in Mississippi. Its Web site does not refer to any specific branch of Christianity.
Stewart told the Jackson Clarion-Ledger that the board will review its policy, but she didn't specify which aspects will be addressed.
The Web site says all Bethany staff and adoptive applicants personally agree with the faith statement, which describes belief in the Christian Church and the Scripture.
"As the Savior, Jesus takes away the sins of the world," the statement says in part. "Jesus is the one in whom we are called to put our hope, our only hope for forgiveness of sin and for reconciliation with God and with one another."
Sandy Steadman said she was hurt and disappointed that Bethany received funds from the Choose Life car license plates. "I know of a lot of Catholics who get those tags," she said.
She added: "If it's OK to accept our money, it should be OK to open your home to us as a family."
Bethany is one of 24 adoption and pregnancy counseling centers in Mississippi that receives money from the sale of Choose Life tags, a special plate that motorists can obtain with an extra fee.
Of $244,000 generated by the sale of the tags in 2004, Bethany received $7,053, said Geraldine Gray, treasurer of Choose Life Mississippi, which distributes the money.
"It is troubling to me if they are discriminating based on only the Catholics," Gray said.
I would say you were wrong to do such things, for dead saints in Heaven are very humble people with absolutely NO ability to ask God to do anything for you.
YOU on the other hand, are responsible to speak to God directly.
To try to speak to anyone else is blasphemy, you are ascribing qualities that belong to God alone, to others, whether they be sints or angels.
I'm not sure what you're missing. Please be specific if this doesn't answer the question. Jesus is telling those folks, that Abraham is watching effectively in real time, notes Abraham's joy and relays it. There's no valid reason to take this as a one time only event, or that Mary would have the same view of us now.
Someone might get complicated and say, that this is just related to the fact that, God knows everything before it happens. In that case though, Jesus is telling us that the effective situation for us, as far as prayer goes, is to look at the matter as a real time event. Abraham did indeed see Jesus's day and likewise David's day, ect...
It is also tiresome to debate with you because you just ignore what is posted.
You start by telling me that Jesus Spoke Aramaic because everyone else did, then you tell me only some did...
What next?
All I did when I said Jesus spoke Hebrew was a personal opinion, and both of us agree Hebrew was A spoken language in Israel, didn't we?
So, since you yourself agree Hebrew was a spoken language then, why did you even start the argument?
Stop and think: When the languages were scattered at Babel, did Abrahm's father speak one of them?
Did Abrahm's sons speak the same language as Abrahm?
Did Isaac speak the same language?
Did Jacob speak the same language?
Did Moses speak the same language as his fathers?
Is there any reason to expect that the same language spoken of, written of in the Law in the Synagogues, was NOT spoken in Israel?
And due to the multilingual necessity due to centuries of conquest through Israel, wouldn't there still be one language that the Jews would call their own? Hebrew?
Why would Jesus speak, then, a language other than what was the language of the Bible itself, given to Israel, given Through Israel?
NO, NO, NO!< This is why diagraming sentences is taught in school.
The subject is STILL WHO DO MEN SAY THAT I AM.
I posted right from the start, several sections where THE ROCK is GOD, not a man!
I posted after that, many times, where JESUS IS THE ROCK, not a man!
In order for a RCC person to keep going back to the ROCK being a man, Peter, then you MUST ignore what the Bible says each time it speaks of God being our Rock, you must ignore what the Bible says when it calls God OUR ROCK, Our Deliverer.
You MUST ignore what the Bible says when Jesus is called our Chief Cornerstone...
Because if you dont ignore what it says, you have zero Biblical reason to ever connect ROCK with Peter, a sinful man whom Jesus CALLED SATAN immediately after!
This represents the elders, the saints in heaven, offering to God the prayers of his faithful on earth.
My brother, surely you believe that we are all members of one Body, which is the Body of Christ. Over and over again, in I Corinthians, Romans, Colossians, St. Paul repeats his magnificent theme that the members of one Body all love one another, all rely on each other, all need each other and all communicate with each other.
Do you imagine that once you are in heaven, you are no longer a member of the Body of Christ? You are cut off? Or you do not love as much? Or you are no longer able to pray for your loved ones in heaven as you once did upon earth?
What is you belief, really? That while in heaven you love less? You pray less? You care less? Or you are less in communion with the Body of Christ, which includes all who are joined to Him (and you) on earth?
Surely life in heaven occasions a vast expansion of knowledge, love, and prayer, not a diminishment. Or do you think God says, "I don't listen to these people: they're dead"? If that's the case, it's a pretty poor heaven.
But thank God we are all part of the Body of Christ, even if some of us give the impression of "I don't need you."
You are my fellow Christian, and I need you.
No, You dont!
You need a great Saviour!
Do you honestly think that God needs the Elders to present Him with the prayers of the faithful? Now, for sure God tells us here that the Elders did such a thing, but do you really think that humans are as powerful as God in any way?
(Psa 56:8 KJV) Thou tellest my wanderings: put thou my tears into thy bottle: are they not in thy book?
(Psa 56:9 KJV) When I cry unto thee, then shall mine enemies turn back: this I know; for God is for me.
Who puts the tears of the Saints in a bottle? God does.
Name one instance in the Bible where ANYONE prayed to ANYONE else other than God? If the Elders then present the vial of prayers to God, from the faithful, then who must have collected them? Who were the prayers sent to?
To pray to anyone else ascribes the attributes of God to that other person/thing, and that is idolatry. You just tried to say that some person, place, or thing can hear prayers and can speak to God for you, or through that person.
(1 Tim 2:5 KJV) For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
---Name one instance in the Bible where ANYONE prayed to ANYONE else other than God?---
Will do, Race, providing you first cite Scripture and verse detailing the precise books of the Bible that are to be included in the Canon of Scripture!
Cheers!
Frank
Well, we can start with all the books of the Old Testament that were there CENTURIES before there was a RCC...
However, you can tell me which ones they voted on keeping, after all, if we owe the Bible to the RCC, surely they had to vote to keep some of the Old Testament and keep some out of it, right?
Right?
Please answer my question, Race. You rely solely on the Canon and on Sola Scriptura. So, where is the Canon defined in Scripture?
Frank
And that question relates to your total misunderstanding of the Trinity and your Arian leanings just how?
Frank
Which church/denomination would that be? Catholicism dates back to St. Peter arriving in Rome to set up a church, appox. 42 A.D.
Please answer my question, Frank, Where did the Jews get the Bible from without the RCC?
Sorry, Race. That is NOT how this works. I promised you in number 768 to cite passages that are commensurate with praying to the Saints IF you'd tell me where the Canon is defined in Scripture. You can't do that because it isn't (defined in Scripture) and you know that all too well.
You are a Marine, brother, so Semper Fi. I will give some things for you to ponder concering prayers to Saints courtesy of Patrick Madrid. I suggest you check out the new book by Dave Armstrong called "The Catholic Verses". It is on my must read list. You may wish to check it out.
Thank you. I wasn't sure what you meant.
OK. Actually, it says abraham rejoiced (past tense) at the thought of seeing Messiah's day. He will in the Millenial Kingdom. Not now. So I don't believe you are accurate in how you read this passage. No. Abraham is not watching now. Nothing says he is currently. So no, I don't believe this is a valid foundation for saying Mary could also do it.
Again, I appreciate your tone and have enjoyed interacting with you - even though we disagree.
best, ampu
I asked: Frank I'm wondering if you believe you have everlasting life which is assured because of your faith in the propitiatory death and resurrection of Jesus Christ?
You replied: And that question relates to your total misunderstanding of the Trinity and your Arian leanings just how?
I take it as a "no".
That is a repackage of the Arian Heresy as I pointed out just above. I also described the essence of the Trinity as best one can in 50 words or less [and who is only a 'creature' trying to understand the total mystery of the Divine.]
What you construe by my reply or failure to give one is "apologetics judo." I asked a question and you are deflecting my attention to "Hey look! There's a fly on the wall!"
The issue is, do you believe that Mary is the Mother of God? A simple yes or no will suffice. That is your reply to which I initially responded.
Remember that God loves you and wants to save you and share everlasting life with you in Heaven.
Philippians 4:6-8 (New International Version)
6Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. 7And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.
8Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirableif anything is excellent or praiseworthythink about such things.
John 3: 16"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son. 19This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. 21But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."[h]
Sorry, Frank, but that is not how it works.
Unless you can show me from the Bible that it is ok to pray to dead humans, you have no argument.
This is a Biblical argument, not a RCC one.
Since the RCC does not teach the Biblical pattern of prayer, it is not Biblical.
NO ONE in the Bible prayed to a dead person.
Men and Women prayed to God.
You must show me where, in the Bible, people prayed to dead people.
I refuse to read anything from anyone that calls itself authoritative and condones prayers to or through dead people.
That is heresy, that is blasphemy, that is against the simple teachings of the Bible.
And you still havent answered my questions yet.
Fundamentalism's "political allies against Liberal elitism," ladies and gentlemen!
Hey, not everyone can be an intellectual like all those billions of illiterate medieval peasants, you know!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.