Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China ‘ready to use N-weapons against US’
Financial Times ^ | July 14 2005 | Alexandra Harney

Posted on 07/14/2005 2:39:38 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite

China is prepared to use nuclear weapons against the US if it is attacked by Washington during a confrontation over Taiwan, according to a senior Chinese military official.

“If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition on to the target zone on China's territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons,” Zhu Chenghu, a major general in the People's Liberation Army, said at an official briefing.

Mr Zhu, who is also a professor at China's National Defence University, was speaking at a function for foreign journalists organised, in part, by the Chinese government. He added that China's definition of its territory includes warships and aircraft.

“If the Americans are determined to interfere [then] we will be determined to respond,” Mr Zhu said. “We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds. . . of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese.” Mr Zhu is a self-acknowledged “hawk” who has warned previously that China could strike the US with long-range missiles. But his threat to use nuclear weapons in a conflict over Taiwan is the most specific by a senior Chinese official in nearly a decade.

Rick Fisher, a former senior US congressional official and an authority on the Chinese military, said the specific nature of the threat “is a new addition to China's public discourse”.

China's official doctrine has called for no first use of nuclear weapons since its first atomic test in 1964. But Mr Zhu is not the first Chinese official to refer to the possibility of using such weapons first in a conflict over Taiwan.

Chas Freeman, a former US assistant secretary of defence, said in 1999 that a PLA official had told him China could respond in kind to a nuclear strike by the US in the event of a conflict with Taiwan.

“In the end you care more about Los Angeles than you do about Taipei,” Mr Freeman quoted this official as saying. The official is believed to have been Xiong Guangkai, now the PLA's deputy chief of general staff.

The rationale for the new threats is unclear. China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs could not be reached for comment.

Mr Zhu, who has risen from the rank of colonel over the past five years, insisted he was expressing his personal views, and that they did not represent the policy of the Chinese government. Nor was he anticipating war between China and the US.

But he said that, because China did not have the capability to fight a conventional war against the US, the threat to escalate might be the only way to stop a war.

His comments could provide insight into the thinking among some in the PLA amid growing anxiety in Washington about its capabilities. Last month, Donald Rumsfeld, defence secretary, voiced concern about China's military build-up.

Additional reporting by Edward Alden in Washington


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chicoms; china; nukes; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 next last
To: FierceDraka
30 minutes, yes, if we use the land-based ICBM leg of our nuclear triad. Less than 5 minutes if launching SLBM's from our submarines.

Just like an American to always be in a hurry ;)

161 posted on 07/14/2005 6:35:59 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
A single Ohio-class sub has more nuclear warheads than China's arsenal put together.

Man, I love those Ohio-class boomers.

Call me a Cold War dinosaur, but the fact that we have literally thousands and thousands of nuclear weapons poised to strike lets me sleep well at night.

162 posted on 07/14/2005 6:36:00 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka

Yep I agree.


163 posted on 07/14/2005 6:42:45 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

Is this similar to dropping the f-bomb. Probably not. Sorry, wrong thread.


164 posted on 07/14/2005 6:44:00 PM PDT by hollywood (Stay on topic, please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediForce

Me too.

North Korea is irritating us also- same playbook.


165 posted on 07/14/2005 7:44:20 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (America is gradually becoming the Godless,out-of-control golden-calf scene,in "The Ten Commandments")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

I did not say over night. Do you know what demand flow manufacturing is?


166 posted on 07/14/2005 8:43:17 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite; GOP_1900AD
Capitalism is the great machine that feeds us, but these days, it has no regard for consequences or tomorrows. All conflicts of interest between Defense and markets should be severed now.
NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS
China's Nuclear Force Modernization (PDF)
Lyle J. Goldstein, Editor, with Andrew S. Erickson


According to the 2003–2004 issue of the IISS Military Balance, one brigade (eight missiles) of the long-anticipated DF-31 inter-continental ballistic missile (ICBM) is now deployed, with more presumably to follow in relatively short order . . . While this is not the first road-mobile, solid-fuel missile deployed by China, it is the first one capable of striking the continental United States.

The range of the DF-31 is 8,000 kilometers, which is close to 5,000 miles. Our west coast and several northern states in the Rockies are within its range. The DF-31 has a CEP of only 300-500 meters if not closer than that by now. China has already built its own GPS with plans for worldwide coverage soon, and it is accurate to within 12 meters. The Chinese DF-41 and other systems are under development. Some of those systems will reach any part of the United States, and our Defense does not know as to whether they've been deployed, yet.
167 posted on 07/15/2005 2:33:03 AM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite; GOP_1900AD
Please pardon my error. Here's that information with the link.

NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT PAPERS
China's Nuclear Force Modernization (PDF)
Lyle J. Goldstein, Editor, with Andrew S. Erickson
http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/npapers/np22/NP22.pdf
According to the 2003–2004 issue of the IISS Military Balance, one brigade (eight missiles) of the long-anticipated DF-31 inter-continental ballistic missile (ICBM) is now deployed, with more presumably to follow in relatively short order . . . While this is not the first road-mobile, solid-fuel missile deployed by China, it is the first one capable of striking the continental United States.

The range of the DF-31 is 8,000 kilometers, which is close to 5,000 miles. Our west coast and several northern states in the Rockies are within its range. The DF-31 has a CEP of only 300-500 meters if not closer than that by now. China has already built its own GPS with plans for worldwide coverage soon, and it is accurate to within 12 meters. The Chinese DF-41 and other systems are under development. Some of those systems will reach any part of the United States, and our Defense does not know as to whether they've been deployed, yet.
168 posted on 07/15/2005 2:37:30 AM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

If the use the N-weapon, we'll be using the F-word.


169 posted on 07/15/2005 2:39:07 AM PDT by cahmd52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

US TOLD TO LEAVE CENTRAL ASIA [Russia & China demand "deadline."]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1437369/posts

Russia will equip Iranian Submarines with Missiles
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1437370/posts

Orthodox Church Says Western Human Rights Don’t Suit Russia
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1437110/posts

CIS military exercise taking place in Russia
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20050624/40757551.html

Russia will preserve its positions in Iran under any president
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1430361/posts

Russia, N.Korea, China give Iran missile aid -CIA
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/519198/posts

China, Russia, Iran and our next move (2/10/02)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/626057/posts

US accuses Russia and China over North Korea bomb (10/19/02)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/772101/posts

China warns of new arms race if ABM treaty is amended: Russia & China
working together to stop NMD (6/6/00)
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a393d1b287e37.htm

China, Russia and Central Asia unite against US missile shield
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b29ebac7e95.htm

Red China and Russia unite to create New World Order says communist newspaper (6/18/01)
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b2e42bd0629.htm

CIA: Russia, China working on information warfare (6/21/01)
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b32d9f412df.htm

US blasts Russia, China for opposition to Iraq sanctions plan (6/26/01)
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b38e03721e5.htm

Russia, China sign historic friendship treaty (7/16/01)
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b533a696e56.htm


170 posted on 07/15/2005 2:48:14 AM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

CHINESE DAM CRAFTMANSHIP:

No crack anymore on the Three Gorges dam: official


There will be no crack anymore on the dam of the right bank of the Three Gorges Project, which is now under construction, even the whole dam, said chief of the China Three Gorges Project Corporation.

The June saw the first anniversary of the completion of the water storage in Three Gorges reservoir, the concrete construction is underway for the dam of the bank on the right. Cao Guangjing, deputy general manager of Three Gorges Project Corporation, said they would try to ensure there would be no crack anymore on the dam. This is not only a wish and a goal but also an assurance.

The Three Gorges Projects consist of three phases: the five-year-long first phase (1993-1997), the second (1997-2003), which is mainly for the dam on the left bank, and the third (2003-2009) phase for the dam of the bank on the right.

Cracks had been found in the completed left dam. Now reporters can not find any there. Staff members told that due to factors like weather, over 80 cracks had been found on the left dam, but they were merely 0.1 to 0.2 millimeter's wide instead of as wide as hand could reach in as rumored.

Cao assured that the cracks are not deep enough as to affect the security of the dam. Presently, chemical grouting has been done to eliminate leakage. Sources say that such cracks mentioned above are defined as "quality defects" in official documents.

The responsible did face up to the defects and accidents during the construction of Three Gorges Project ten years ago. The responsible person said that serious sum-up and review have been made to avoid the reoccurrence of the same problem.

He said, "on the whole good" was the rating given by the expert panel for the quality appraisal of Three Gorges Project under the State Council. But, such wording as "on the whole" will never be affixed on the appraisal of the third phase.

As learned, management in quality has been tightened in the third phase with new technologies applied. The cracks on the dam of the left bank originated mainly from the linkages of concrete pouring. During concrete pouring, internal high temperature and low temperature on the surface sometimes led to cracks. But now, after the pouring, cooling process is added for the concrete, and during cold seasons, there will be cover to maintain the proper temperature.

New temperature-keeping materials such as polystyrene panel, instead of ordinary foamed materials for the linkages in the second phase, are used in the third phase, said Peng Gang, deputy director of the construction section of Three Gorges Project Corporation.

When asked whether cracks would have been avoided if such operations were done for the second phase then, Peng said that reasons for cracks to happen were quite complicated and almost inevitable for all the dams worldwide. With the lesson drawn from the left dam and many tests have been done by the constructors to prevent cracks to happen.

By People's Daily Online


171 posted on 07/15/2005 2:53:19 AM PDT by razorbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: All

So you guys still think terrorism of Islamic origin is our major threat?


172 posted on 07/15/2005 4:57:40 AM PDT by CodeRouge (So you still think terrorism of Islamic origin is our major threat? Hint: check out local Wal-Mart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
I did not say over night. Do you know what demand flow manufacturing is?

Yes. I also know how long it takes to train, test and field weaponry. It took the Soviets and the U.S. a long time to build up significant numbers of ICBMs. It also took a vast amount of money. Perhaps it is more instructive to look at China's vulnerability and our strength in a nuclear exchange. We would have plenty of warning to get our ICBMs in the air. Our first wave would dwarf China's and we would have a tremendous second wave if needed from our SSBNs. China has some large land adversaries, will they shoot everything at us? But China, about the same size as the U.S., has a much more compact population. Again, again, again, I'm not trying to say that the Chinese aren't a worry. They can cause trouble and do some damage, especially if we underestimate them. I'm simply saying that we are currently holding a vastly superior hand, if we don't forget how to play it.

173 posted on 07/15/2005 5:47:06 AM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
My, my. The country we sent industry to...the country we sent jobs to...the country we sent technology to...is going to turn around and nuke us. And still the free traitors grasp themselves in Michael Jackson style, while simpering and moaning about lower prices for consumers

And they still are, with the variant that the principal importers and other internationally-conflicted companies are lobbying like quislings...did you see THIS?:

House Rejects Bill Monitoring China Arms Sales
By AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, WASHINGTON, July 15, 2005

The U.S. House of Representatives on July 14 rejected a measure that would have imposed stiff penalties on European firms selling weapons technology to China.

By a vote of 215 to 203, the “East Asia Security Act” failed to garner the two-thirds majority needed for passage after U.S. business groups reportedly expressed concerns that they would be hurt by the measure.

Congressional officials said after the vote that the legislation’s author, Republican Henry Hyde, will make a second attempt to pass the bill next week by inserting it in State Department funding legislation, where it has better odds of passage.

The bill welcomed deferral of an EU decision to terminate an arms embargo to China, but expressed concern that sales could proceed indirectly via various loopholes, since some European firms which reportedly have aided Beijing’s military build-up are also participants in leading edge U.S. weapons programs.

Among other measures, the legislation called on U.S. President George W. Bush to make an annual report to Congress “identifying every foreign person of the EU that has exported to China any arms or dual use technology for military end use since January 1, 2005.”

174 posted on 07/15/2005 7:43:01 AM PDT by Paul Ross (George Patton: "I hate to have to fight for the same ground twice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: IonImplantGuru

Tell me about it ~ I lived in the SF Bay Area from '48 until '90. :)


175 posted on 07/15/2005 7:46:19 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
I should have posted this here...

But Am I the only ony one that Thought of Fifty Cent?


176 posted on 07/15/2005 8:50:20 AM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual

"Wal-Mart was mentioned simply as an exemplification of the problem. Of course we would need to stop buying all Chinese goods, how hard is that to understand? I don't recall that Thailand, India, Japan, et. al. have raised the possibility of nuclear war"

In the past Russia, and recently North Korea has threatened the U.S. with nucs. I simply find it odd and suspicious when Wal-Mart is the only retailer repeatedly targeted regarding China made products when IN FACT ALL retailers from super chain retailers to (YES) Mom n Pop retailers (See Ebay and flea/antique malls) purchase China made products. Even (((shudder)) Mardel the large exclusively religious only product retail chain carries mostly China/Mexican made products. So if Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, etc., are going to play the blame game they should hold every retailer to the same fire.


177 posted on 07/15/2005 12:18:58 PM PDT by SunnySide (Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

They probably did not do that. But everyone knows the score on Aswan High Dam and Mecca.

If Israel goes down, they go with it.


178 posted on 07/15/2005 12:36:23 PM PDT by TexanToTheCore (Rock the pews, Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Last Dakotan

What response would you suggest?


179 posted on 07/15/2005 1:37:10 PM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs

I don't know. I feel China will slip in and annex Taiwan while we are busy dealing with the aftermath of blows by AQ...


180 posted on 07/15/2005 1:39:19 PM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-186 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson