Skip to comments.
Fox News reporting that Sandra Day O'Connor retiring!
Fox News
| 7/1/05
| SueRae
Posted on 07/01/2005 7:14:03 AM PDT by SueRae
Hearing on Fox News
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 1down6togo; filibustertime; herewego; oconnor; retirement; sandradayoconnor; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 1,281-1,297 next last
To: redgolum; Reagan79
FYI..there's a piece in today's Washington Times..the authors has a great line...."Barack Obama will soon be competing with Harold Ford Jr for the Carol Mosely-Braun-lite contest.."
241
posted on
07/01/2005 7:43:53 AM PDT
by
ken5050
To: SueRae
Why hasn't anyone suggested Karl Rove?
242
posted on
07/01/2005 7:43:55 AM PDT
by
mike182d
("Let fly the white flag of war." - Zapp Brannigan)
To: SueRae
This has got to be a strict conservative, constitution backing appointment. I have worked for the president tirelessly here in Florida but where the Supreme Court is concerned the spine has to be firm and strong. Start the phone call to the White House and the Senate. THEY MUST HEAR FROM US.
To: Hacksaw
I fear we're gonna get screwed on this one. O'Connor now...and then Rhenquist or Stevens will undoubtedly be next. Actually, I think what we'll get is what his father gave us-one damn good justice like Thomas, and one linguini spined liberal. Since O'Connor isn't always on our side, it may give us at least a small advantage over the current court.
244
posted on
07/01/2005 7:44:01 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
To: kingattax
Reid can't be far behind...LOL
To: MomwithHope
They go after the troops, so they would go after Ted as well.
246
posted on
07/01/2005 7:44:20 AM PDT
by
Reagan79
(Ralph Stanley Rocks!)
To: Soul Seeker
And Reagan had a 2-1 recod not in our favor. You again leave that historical note off in your bash.
My "bash" was never directed at Reagan, but at Bush 1. Reagan never gave us a Souter or lied about taxes or propped the Clintons up right before a Hillary prez run. Remember this thread instead of shooting the messenger - Bush and the GOP will cave - we will get at best a moderate. Have you not been watching the Senate lately???
To: since1868
That would be an excellent choice.
To: YaYa123
I have to believe GWB and those around him have known for a LONG time who his first appointment would be, when the time came.
249
posted on
07/01/2005 7:44:23 AM PDT
by
daler
(q)
To: Peach
Yee hawww!!! Let the games begin!
250
posted on
07/01/2005 7:44:35 AM PDT
by
marway
(Say NO to judicial activism!)
To: eyespysomething
Clone Thomas.
The Democrat majority in the Senate will never allow Bush to appoint an originalist to the court, particularly to fill one of the "swing" votes occupied by someone whose rulings suggest at least a mild case of schizophrenia.
251
posted on
07/01/2005 7:44:50 AM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(America is the Last Beach)
To: theDentist
consiliatory to the Minority Party", "in the name of bi-partisanship", and "meeting them half-way in the name of justice".new tone.
252
posted on
07/01/2005 7:44:50 AM PDT
by
johnb838
(Adios, liberal mofos!)
To: cajungirl
social conservative want a constructionist judge. A constitutionalist. That is the same thing, I believe ALL conservatives wish. If such a judge isn't put on the court, how is the country turned in the right direction?
I don't understand your critisism.
To: bitt
You love that guy and I like your suggestion! Ted Olsen first.
254
posted on
07/01/2005 7:45:19 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: YaYa123
Many people besides Billy Boy had a clue since she did not rehire her staff.
To: RoseofTexas
O'Connor has been the swing vote IN THE LIBERAL'S FAVOR, on many important cases.........for instance, she was the fifth vote to protect partial birth abortion. Good riddance, Sandra.
256
posted on
07/01/2005 7:45:22 AM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
To: SmithL
I'll third, fourth and fifth that nomination.
257
posted on
07/01/2005 7:45:30 AM PDT
by
marine86297
(I'll never forgive Clinton for Somalia, my blood is on his hands)
To: CitizenM
I have a strange proposal: Appoint Hillary. Citizen, my friend with all due respect I think something you ate has affected you. Appointing Hitlery to SCOTUS is akin to having Bill run a cathouse. She'd have a lifetime of fun at our expense.
To: Dansong
Then you obviously haven't listened to what he has had to say since he first started running or paid attention to his list of judicial nominations. He is about strict Constitutionalist not wishy washy SCOTUS -- why do you think the RATs have filibustered so much. Obviously, you just wanted to attack the President once again when you should know what you had to say was WRONG!
259
posted on
07/01/2005 7:45:42 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
To: SittinYonder
That Does not matter.We have to nominate a true conservative anyway.
260
posted on
07/01/2005 7:45:51 AM PDT
by
Gipper08
(Mike Pence in 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 1,281-1,297 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson