Skip to comments.
High Court: Govts Can Take Property for Econ Development
Bloomberg News
Posted on 06/23/2005 7:30:08 AM PDT by Helmholtz
U.S. Supreme Court says cities have broad powers to take property.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barratry; bastards; biggovernment; blackrobedthieves; breyer; commies; communism; communismherewecome; confiscators; corrupt; doescharactercount; duersagreewithus; eminentdomain; fascism; feastofbelshazzar; foreignanddomestic; frommycolddeadhands; ginsburg; grabbers; henchmen; hillarysgoons; isittimeyet; johnpaulstevens; jurisbullshit; kelo; liberalssuck; livingdocument; moneytalks; mutabletruth; nabothsvineyard; nabothvsjezebel; nuts; oligarchy; plusgoodduckspeakers; plutocracy; positivism; prolefeed; propertyrights; revolutionwontbeontv; robedtryants; rubberethics; ruling; scotus; showmethemoney; socialism; socialistbastards; souter; stooges; supremecourt; thieves; turbulentpriests; tyranny; tyrrany; usscsucks; votefromtherooftops; wearescrewed; weneededbork; whoboughtthisone; youdontownjack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 1,521-1,527 next last
To: SoFloFreeper
Greetings to a fellow Floridian.
241
posted on
06/23/2005 8:43:35 AM PDT
by
lastchance
(Hug your babies.)
To: TheSpottedOwl
I have a better one: any old oak trees on the properties? Rare plant species? Historical landmarks? Spotted owl nests???? Yup.
It's time to play dirty.
242
posted on
06/23/2005 8:43:53 AM PDT
by
Freebird Forever
(Imagine if islam controlled the internet.)
To: montag813
Go read about the IKEA store in New Jersey a few years ago. If I remember correctly, that was a well established residential area. Like I said, I do not believe I am blowing this out of proportion. Not one bit.
243
posted on
06/23/2005 8:43:55 AM PDT
by
Tatze
(I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
To: Helmholtz
Try Eminent Domain.... certainly it can by imminent, if it is used against you.
To: Helmholtz
Most the citizens, and legislators have been brainwashed into this for years. Now they have made official.
This is soooo serious, and makes me so sick.
To: OB1kNOb
To: TheBigB
Blatantly unconstitutional.
I just HAVE to see the justices' "reasoning" behind this.
247
posted on
06/23/2005 8:44:38 AM PDT
by
Constitution Day
(Emphatically eschew exclamatory excess.)
To: Tatze
Comment #249 Removed by Moderator
To: RightWhale
The only doubt regards the boundaries of the right, which is what I said before. What would you concede as an explicit acknowledgment of private property rights? I imagine it'd be something like this:
"The right to private ownership of property shall not be abridged."
That is exactly what the Framers have stated by their formulation. With other words, they have said the following: 'The right to private property shall not be abridged except...'
There is no other rational way to read the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
250
posted on
06/23/2005 8:45:15 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: RightWhale
The only doubt regards the boundaries of the right, which is what I said before. What would you concede as an explicit acknowledgment of private property rights? I imagine it'd be something like this:
"The right to private ownership of property shall not be abridged."
That is exactly what the Framers have stated by their formulation. With other words, they have said the following: 'The right to private property shall not be abridged except...'
There is no other rational way to read the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
251
posted on
06/23/2005 8:45:29 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: mrs9x
You are right in that this will not effect people in many states. But some states, with blighted cities, will not want to tie their own hands so tightly. With any luck, they will prevent local governments from doing so.
252
posted on
06/23/2005 8:45:33 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
To: B Knotts
And the Fifth Amendment might as well never have been written So that just leaves the remnants of the second right?
253
posted on
06/23/2005 8:46:17 AM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Red Boots
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it,AMEN!
and
Of the Simplicity of Criminal Laws in Different Governments
In republican governments, men are all equal; equal they are also in despotic governments:
in the former, because they are everything; in the latter, because they are nothing.
THE SPIRIT OF LAWS Book VI
By Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu
(One of the most quoted writings used by the Founders while forming our government.)
254
posted on
06/23/2005 8:46:18 AM PDT
by
MamaTexan
(IMPEACH the black - robed BASTARDS!!)
To: Helmholtz
I think we've finally reached the point where even a French "man" has stronger property rights than an American.
255
posted on
06/23/2005 8:46:38 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: RightWhale
PS. Please do me a favor and don't bring up the Terri Schiavo case to me. Most people around here lose all sense of reason and logic when discussing that and I just don't want to go there anymore.
256
posted on
06/23/2005 8:47:05 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Nightshift
257
posted on
06/23/2005 8:47:20 AM PDT
by
tutstar
( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
To: Dat Mon
The scariest part if the legalization of socioeconomic cleansing explicit and central to this case. 117 homes have been taken to be replaced with 80 new homes. Because the values of the old homes were less, the government can now declare them derelict, and start eminent domain against them. For the property tax revenue increases for the government. It's the new American racism, and the Supreme Court have "legalized" the bigotry. In decades to come, this ruling will be seen equivalent to Plessy vs. Ferguson, and there's no better time than today to
Start calling it the Plessy vs. Ferguson of 21st century mulitcultural America.
To: glennaro
259
posted on
06/23/2005 8:48:42 AM PDT
by
OB1kNOb
(Excrementum Occurum)
To: BlackElk
260
posted on
06/23/2005 8:48:53 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 1,521-1,527 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson