Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Jackson Verdict Watch (Live Thread-[Update-Not Guilty ALL Counts])
Court TV; MSNBC; Fox ^ | June 3, 2005

Posted on 06/03/2005 12:26:19 PM PDT by Howlin

Bayliffs being sworn in, alternatives have been sent home!

This circus is about to be in the hands of the jury!

Bets? Predictions?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 123noevidence; bluestateverdict; boysboysboys; boysgonewild; castatesucks; eeheeee; feedtheworld; freakwatch2005; hesalittlepirate; hesbad; hewenthome; jacko; jackowillwalk; jackson; jesusjuice; kidlied; liarkid; momliar; moonwalked; neverland; noskinoffmynose; pedophile; pervwatch; poorpoorcase; sodomite; statedidnotprovecase; thisaintlive; thriller; trial; verdictnextweek; wackojacko; walmartpants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,421-3,4403,441-3,4603,461-3,480 ... 4,181-4,187 next last
To: Velveeta


Michael Jackson fan Andre White bursts into tears as Jackson arrives at the Santa Barbara County Courthouse to listen to the verdict in his child molestation trial in Santa Maria, California June 13, 2005.
3,441 posted on 06/13/2005 2:11:39 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3425 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Nancy Grace is going ballistic already...


3,442 posted on 06/13/2005 2:11:40 PM PDT by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3431 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Court TV:


Jury won't look at Jackson = bad news for Jackson


3,443 posted on 06/13/2005 2:11:47 PM PDT by Petronski (Be alert! The world needs more lerts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3432 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
The jurors are not looking at Jackson--significant?

Yeah, they probably remember being kids.

3,444 posted on 06/13/2005 2:11:48 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3431 | View Replies]

Jury staring at the judge! Not looking around!


3,445 posted on 06/13/2005 2:11:59 PM PDT by theophilusscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3434 | View Replies]

To: Peach


You're right. I truly have had more drama during these past 3 months than I've had in the whole of my lifetime.

Gosh Peach, this wait is AWFUL.
Flame me, but I feel sorry for Michael right now.
From where he was on the top of the world, reduced to this.
SAD all the way around.

NOT LOOKING at the defendant!


3,446 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:01 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3400 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith

Jurors not looking at Jackson. Not good for him.


3,447 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:03 PM PDT by Poser (Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3433 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette
That's what people thought in the midwest, once. But that was before the lutefisk fiasco.
3,448 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:03 PM PDT by HKMk23 (The requirements of stewardship are NOT a mandate for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3428 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs

Oh, FGS.


3,449 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:04 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3441 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Yes.... usually that means guilty ... of at least some of the charges.


3,450 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:07 PM PDT by CurlyBill (There is NOTHING better than playoff hockey!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3431 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
The jurors are not looking at Jackson--significant?

They've just eaten.

3,451 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:07 PM PDT by Flashman_at_the_charge (A proud member of the self-preservation society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3431 | View Replies]

To: Peach

How long does it take to open 10 envelopes???


3,452 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:09 PM PDT by Abigail Adams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3432 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Thanks!


3,453 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:23 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3384 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith

Jurors staring at the judge. Shep says that this is a sign of a guilty verdict (becaues they won't look at the defendent).


3,454 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:23 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3433 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Jury isn't looking at Jackson, seems a guitly verdict.


3,455 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:24 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3415 | View Replies]

To: spectre

3,456 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:25 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3442 | View Replies]

To: maggiefluffs

Oh, good grief. LOL


3,457 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:25 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3441 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

If they can't find MJ guilty, then California is unable to find anyone guilty, imo.

Maybe not on the conspiracy charges, but on all other...


3,458 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:28 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3443 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Re: The jurors are not looking at Jackson--significant?

Could you look at that freakshow of a person?

3,459 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:28 PM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3431 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry; Bahbah

Fox news talking about all the European fans who will become violent if the verdict goes against MJ.

Shep saying that every single person is looking at the JUDGE! often means conviction, but possibly might be just a sign they took their jurors job seriously.


3,460 posted on 06/13/2005 2:12:33 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (We will not deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents. ---GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3427 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,421-3,4403,441-3,4603,461-3,480 ... 4,181-4,187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson