"Science depends on an objective study of verifiable phenomena."
This is precisely why Dawkins' faith in evolution is not science.
evolution is scientific theory. it attempts to use verifiable objective phenomena to explain physical events. It is still a theory, not a law. Any scientist who believes more than what investigation thus far revealed is not practicing science, agreed. Evidence and experimentation are the only criteria to judge "scientific" validity. Much of the material world fits the theoretical constructs of evolutionary theory. That does not mean further investigation will not make it necessary to revise the theory in light of new evidence. We search for objective truth and are not slave to any particular theory.
This is precisely why Dawkins' faith in evolution is not science.
You forgot to include the part of your post where you actually supported your ludicrous belief.
Evolution is science, and is based on "objective study of verifiable phenomena", no matter what the creationist propaganda may have said to the contrary.