evolution is scientific theory. it attempts to use verifiable objective phenomena to explain physical events. It is still a theory, not a law. Any scientist who believes more than what investigation thus far revealed is not practicing science, agreed. Evidence and experimentation are the only criteria to judge "scientific" validity. Much of the material world fits the theoretical constructs of evolutionary theory. That does not mean further investigation will not make it necessary to revise the theory in light of new evidence. We search for objective truth and are not slave to any particular theory.
"That does not mean further investigation will not make it necessary to revise the theory in light of new evidence. We search for objective truth and are not slave to any particular theory."
Exactly, that is the most scientific statement I have read on this subject for a long time.
If both evolutionist scientists and creationist scientists approached the subject matter with this degree of detachment, the science all round would be better, and it would also progress at a greater rate.