"That does not mean further investigation will not make it necessary to revise the theory in light of new evidence. We search for objective truth and are not slave to any particular theory."
Exactly, that is the most scientific statement I have read on this subject for a long time.
If both evolutionist scientists and creationist scientists approached the subject matter with this degree of detachment, the science all round would be better, and it would also progress at a greater rate.
What "creationist scientists"? I've only seen publications attempting to tear down evolution using research done by scientists that support evolution.
Read the quote from ICR that I think PatrickHenry posted near the start of this thread. They admit outright they do no research, but merely search the scientific literature for snippets that support their prejudice.
They claim it is from lack of funding. But I think rather that there just isn't any scientific proof to be found of God, or that He created the universe.
You would have thought they could find something. Any affirmative evidence whatever, to support their cause. But they've totally struck out. All they can do is criticize science, and offer no theory to replace evolution except "God did it".