Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ichneumon; js1138
Try rereading his comment.

I did. When it comes to the fossil record, evolutionists don't even bother "calculating the probability of things that have already happened." They just forge ahead and make conclusions based on the similar or dissimilar appearances of the critters on display.

But they certainly are starting with an "existing outcome," namely the fossil record itself.

1,078 posted on 05/26/2005 7:03:41 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1054 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
I did. When it comes to the fossil record, evolutionists don't even bother "calculating the probability of things that have already happened." They just forge ahead and make conclusions based on the similar or dissimilar appearances of the critters on display.

This is incorrect. For example, almost all phylogenic reconstructions based on molecular analysis (usually of DNA) involve probability calculations.

1,086 posted on 05/26/2005 7:09:40 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson