Hehe. That is far from a brief example, and I have no idea whether you are addressing one who presrents the proponents of ID. Be that as it may, I stopped and chuckled at your words, "'random assembly' could take place." If nothing else, you are a living, breathing, oxymoron.
Sure.
Hehe. That is far from a brief example, and I have no idea whether you are addressing one who presrents the proponents of ID. Be that as it may, I stopped and chuckled at your words, "'random assembly' could take place." If nothing else, you are a living, breathing, oxymoron.
1,035 posted on 05/26/2005 9:19:41 PM EDT by Fester Chugabrew
Oh! No! TOO! MANY! WORDS!
Ichny, if you can't post a scientific concept in less time than it takes to chuggabrew, fuggedaboudit!
The briefer they are, the more invalid, as a rule. Biology is seldom simple, and any attempts to model it with "brief" analysis are pretty much doomed to be fatally oversimplified.
and I have no idea whether you are addressing one who presrents the proponents of ID.
His worship of Behe didn't tip you off?
Be that as it may, I stopped and chuckled at your words, "'random assembly' could take place."
Why? Is it truly your contention that molecules are incapable of joining in random order? Fascinating...
If nothing else, you are a living, breathing, oxymoron.
In what way?