Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oliver Optic

And it also means that Graham and Dewine (and any of the other five) CAN vote for the nuclear option. As I've said, Saad and Meyers' status is the same as it was yesterday. Nobody 'threw' them over.


1,638 posted on 05/24/2005 12:00:15 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1619 | View Replies ]


To: LisaFab
And it also means that Graham and Dewine (and any of the other five) CAN vote for the nuclear option.

Since a filibuster of Saad and Myers does not violate the agreement....

Why would Graham and Dewine vote for the nuclear option if the Dems haven't violated the agreement?

I suppose we'll just have to see how it turns out, but most of the conservative media outlets and blogs are reading it the same way I am ... Saad and Myers are gone (if the agreement stands).

1,669 posted on 05/24/2005 12:13:38 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1638 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson