Posted on 05/24/2005 6:55:47 AM PDT by AliVeritas
FReepers be prepared for surprises today.
(Excerpt) Read more at c-span.org ...
Grahm is the guy to target, for sure. None of this is possible without him. He folds and the whole ball of wax melts. McCain's effort was to get him into the fold.
Graham goes, and all bets are off.
yep, deals and more deals were made...between the rats and the 7 spectacles...who tossed their Republican Party aside.
I think Arizonians may be turning against him in droves for his arrogance over the border issue, which is solidifying into a political tsunami of titanic proportions.
No.......is he blaming Frist for dragging his feet? The whole thing was definitely mishandled (White House included), IMHO.
Ben Nelson says:
exceptional circumstances = not receiveing all the documents he wants to see.
I just saw it.. I have no idea...
It's unimaginable. And the people putting a good spin on this are really surprising me.
Bingo. I don't recall any of that in 1993 or 1994. I'm too young to remember the Carter years too well (other than the Peanut Farmer with his sweater saying that setting the thermostat at 60 degrees in winter is good).
Yeah, I don't expect anything to come of it.
Now if he'd voted nay, that'd be a little different.
They've got a lot of "reconstruction" of these bases to do.
Me neither. I think Arlen is TRYING to keep a positive outlook, but now I know from him, that he is NOT at all happy with the deal.
LOL
I hope it's not true. How does Rush think he has a list of who is to be blocked? I doubt he has that knowledge.
He was on Tony Snow's show this morning and was fabulous. He calls a spade a spade, and I gotta like that in a politician.
YUP.it mitigates HIS power...
Liberals, race, and history
Thomas Sowell (archive)
May 24, 2005 | Print | Send
If the share of the black vote that goes to the Democrats ever falls to 70 percent, it may be virtually impossible for the Democrats to win the White House or Congress, because they have long ago lost the white male vote and their support among other groups is eroding. Against that background, it is possible to understand their desperate efforts to keep blacks paranoid, not only about Republicans but about American society in general.
Liberal Democrats, especially, must keep blacks fearful of racism everywhere, including in an administration whose Cabinet includes people of Chinese, Japanese, Hispanic, and Jewish ancestry, and two consecutive black Secretaries of State. Blacks must be kept believing that their only hope lies with liberals.
Not only must the present be distorted, so must the past -- and any alternative view of the future must be nipped in the bud. That is why prominent minority figures who stray from the liberal plantation must be discredited, debased and, above all, kept from becoming federal judges.
A thoughtful and highly intelligent member of the California supreme court like Justice Janice Rogers Brown must be smeared as a right-wing extremist, even though she received 76 percent of the vote in California, hardly a right-wing extremist state. But desperate politicians cannot let facts stand in their way.
Least of all can they afford to let Janice Rogers Brown become a national figure on the federal bench. The things she says and does could lead other blacks to begin to think independently -- and that in turn threatens the whole liberal house of cards. If a smear is what it takes to stop her, that is what liberal politicians and the liberal media will use.
It's "not personal" as they say when they smear someone. It doesn't matter how outstanding or upstanding Justice Brown is. She is a threat to the power that means everything to liberal politicians. The Democrats' dependence on blacks for votes means that they must keep blacks dependent on them.
Black self-reliance would be almost as bad as blacks becoming Republicans, as far as liberal Democrats are concerned. All black progress in the past must be depicted as the result of liberal government programs and all hope of future progress must be depicted as dependent on the same liberalism.
In reality, reductions in poverty among blacks and the rise of blacks into higher level occupations were both more pronounced in the years leading up to the civil rights legislation and welfare state policies of the 1960s than in the years that followed.
Moreover, contrary to political myth, a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But facts have never stopped politicians or ideologues before and show no signs of stopping them now.
What blacks have achieved for themselves, without the help of liberals, is of no interest to liberals. Nothing illustrates this better than political reactions to academically successful black schools.
Despite widespread concerns expressed about the abysmal educational performances of most black schools, there is remarkably little interest in those relatively few black schools which have met or exceeded national standards.
Anyone who is serious about the advancement of blacks would want to know what is going on in those ghetto schools whose students have reading and math scores above the national average, when so many other ghetto schools are miles behind in both subjects. But virtually all the studies of such schools have been done by conservatives, while liberals have been strangely silent.
Achievement is not what liberalism is about. Victimhood and dependency are.
Black educational achievements are a special inconvenience for liberals because those achievements have usually been a result of methods and practices that go directly counter to prevailing theories in liberal educational circles and are anathema to the teachers' unions that are key supporters of the Democratic Party.
Many things that would advance blacks would not advance the liberal agenda. That is why the time is long overdue for the two to come to a parting of the ways.
Chris Matthews asked Ben Nelson a few nights ago if Scalia met "exceptional circumstances" or something like that. Nelson said he needed time to "vet him." WHAT?
this guy has been on the court what 20 years. Everyone knows what he stands for. This deal isn't worth the paper it's written on. Of course any conservative is an "exceptional circumstance"!
I hope you're right. I hope they've hurt the base.
* I think he went into this with his eyes wide open. *
I agree! I think McCain was the LEADER of the pack of fools. Bryd spends his time in the 17th and 18th century. How could he have played McCain? lol
And he realizes it too, right?
Well good for Frist, I guess. Still think it's poor practice to put off dealing with problems....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.