Skip to comments.
(DAY-2) LIVE U.S. SENATE "Nuclear" THREAD: for judicial nominations: C-span 2 - 9:30 am EST
http://www.c-span.org ^
| http://www.c-span.org
| http://www.c-span.org
Posted on 05/18/2005 10:21:08 PM PDT by davidosborne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920, 921-940, 941-960 ... 3,721-3,738 next last
To: Mo1; Peach
Keep good notes for me....I've got to pick up my dogs at the groomers. Back ASAP.
921
posted on
05/19/2005 10:24:18 AM PDT
by
Carolinamom
(Dem & RINO senators have "eaten on the insane root that takes the reason prisoner."---.Macbeth)
To: Kerretarded
It means the president alone has the authority. No consent or vote required.
922
posted on
05/19/2005 10:24:21 AM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Rats theme song: "Whatever it is...I'm AGAINST it ! - Groucho Marx")
To: CharlesWayneCT
Look at the Congressional records from the beginning. The actual votes and conclusion (passed or not passed) are all there.
923
posted on
05/19/2005 10:24:41 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Howlin
Pay no mind to these sanctimonious 12 Senators. They have no power if Frist stands firm.
Frist simply says to McPain and the 5 other traitors, vote against the nuclear option- if you dare.
The justification that a filibuster will thwart extreme candidates, is a false issue. A TRULY extreme candidate (NAZI) won't not be nominated; and if so, not confirmed.
The sanctimonious 12 are just trying to be power brokers, and straddle the fence as is their modus operandi. Frist should call the bluff of the Sick "GOP" 6, and thereby, get them on the record. We can take it from there.
924
posted on
05/19/2005 10:24:50 AM PDT
by
sirthomasthemore
(I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
To: ken5050
Where is the HildaBeast throughout all this?
925
posted on
05/19/2005 10:25:24 AM PDT
by
corbe
(mystified)
To: All
Sessions is calling Boxer as being inconsistent with her statements when Clinton was President
926
posted on
05/19/2005 10:25:45 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
To: AFPhys
Article One, Section Five, Clause Two.
"Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings"
927
posted on
05/19/2005 10:25:53 AM PDT
by
lugsoul
To: MarcusTulliusCicero
I agree with the point about changing the rule. If the filibuster (constitutional or not) is a measure of the intensity of passion within the minority, then the desire to change the rules is the measure of intensity within the majority to support their position.
-PJ
To: princess leah
This is EXACTLY what needs to be drummed in at the senate - Democrats PUT OUT MEMOS last year on how they would obstruct any and all President Bush's nominees, ideas, bills, etc...And that is emphasized in this RNC add (Party of NO)...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Yeah, they're busting out the dems past quotes now......
930
posted on
05/19/2005 10:27:09 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
To: All
Sen hatch from Utah is up next!
931
posted on
05/19/2005 10:27:32 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
To: Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
HATCH on the floor............for 30 mins
932
posted on
05/19/2005 10:27:44 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
To: Carolinamom
Orrin Hatch up.
I'm going to have to log off soon...thunderstorms moving in.
933
posted on
05/19/2005 10:27:59 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: corbe
934
posted on
05/19/2005 10:28:00 AM PDT
by
ken5050
(Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"
Sen Bond did us proud!" Absolutely!!
935
posted on
05/19/2005 10:28:07 AM PDT
by
maxter
To: Howlin
I called DeWiner's office. The gal that answered the phone was very nice and she was being bombarded with calls.
936
posted on
05/19/2005 10:28:16 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(this tagline is currently being filibustered by Democrats, NUKULAR option coming soon)
To: ken5050
Well Frist, Specter, Lott, Sessions, Bond, Smith, McConnell, Hutchinson. I think that's all the Republicans.
Dems: Stabenow, Reid, Schumer,
Anyone else gang?
937
posted on
05/19/2005 10:28:21 AM PDT
by
defconw
To: OXENinFLA
Hatch commenting about the fact that Sessions had previously been denied a judgeship by the DemonicRats and now he is a member of the Judiciary Committee.....
938
posted on
05/19/2005 10:29:03 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
To: Kerretarded
It means that Congress could "vest" (delegate) appointment power of lower appealant court judges (exclusive of the supreme Court) in the President alone by writing such a law.
Don't look for Congress to approve a law which takes that much power away from the Senate, but it could be done. Likewise, in the subsiquent congress, such a law could be repealed as any law can be repealed.
939
posted on
05/19/2005 10:29:22 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
To: dubyaismypresident
940
posted on
05/19/2005 10:30:10 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(No Judge "LEFT BEHIND!" - No Deal!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920, 921-940, 941-960 ... 3,721-3,738 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson