Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(DAY-2) LIVE U.S. SENATE "Nuclear" THREAD: for judicial nominations: C-span 2 - 9:30 am EST
http://www.c-span.org ^ | http://www.c-span.org | http://www.c-span.org

Posted on 05/18/2005 10:21:08 PM PDT by davidosborne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 3,721-3,738 next last
To: Mo1; Peach

Keep good notes for me....I've got to pick up my dogs at the groomers. Back ASAP.


921 posted on 05/19/2005 10:24:18 AM PDT by Carolinamom (Dem & RINO senators have "eaten on the insane root that takes the reason prisoner."---.Macbeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 896 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

It means the president alone has the authority. No consent or vote required.


922 posted on 05/19/2005 10:24:21 AM PDT by Fledermaus (Rats theme song: "Whatever it is...I'm AGAINST it ! - Groucho Marx")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Look at the Congressional records from the beginning. The actual votes and conclusion (passed or not passed) are all there.


923 posted on 05/19/2005 10:24:41 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Pay no mind to these sanctimonious 12 Senators. They have no power if Frist stands firm.

Frist simply says to McPain and the 5 other traitors, vote against the nuclear option- if you dare.

The justification that a filibuster will thwart extreme candidates, is a false issue. A TRULY extreme candidate (NAZI) won't not be nominated; and if so, not confirmed.

The sanctimonious 12 are just trying to be power brokers, and straddle the fence as is their modus operandi. Frist should call the bluff of the Sick "GOP" 6, and thereby, get them on the record. We can take it from there.
924 posted on 05/19/2005 10:24:50 AM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Where is the HildaBeast throughout all this?


925 posted on 05/19/2005 10:25:24 AM PDT by corbe (mystified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]

To: All
Sessions is calling Boxer as being inconsistent with her statements when Clinton was President
926 posted on 05/19/2005 10:25:45 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Article One, Section Five, Clause Two.

"Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings"

927 posted on 05/19/2005 10:25:53 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: MarcusTulliusCicero
I agree with the point about changing the rule. If the filibuster (constitutional or not) is a measure of the intensity of passion within the minority, then the desire to change the rules is the measure of intensity within the majority to support their position.

-PJ

928 posted on 05/19/2005 10:26:06 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 830 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
This is EXACTLY what needs to be drummed in at the senate - Democrats PUT OUT MEMOS last year on how they would obstruct any and all President Bush's nominees, ideas, bills, etc...

And that is emphasized in this RNC add (Party of NO)...

929 posted on 05/19/2005 10:26:09 AM PDT by easonc52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Yeah, they're busting out the dems past quotes now......


930 posted on 05/19/2005 10:27:09 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 926 | View Replies]

To: All

Sen hatch from Utah is up next!


931 posted on 05/19/2005 10:27:32 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 926 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...

HATCH on the floor............for 30 mins


932 posted on 05/19/2005 10:27:44 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 930 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom

Orrin Hatch up.

I'm going to have to log off soon...thunderstorms moving in.


933 posted on 05/19/2005 10:27:59 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 921 | View Replies]

To: corbe

Raising money..


934 posted on 05/19/2005 10:28:00 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Sen Bond did us proud!"

Absolutely!!

935 posted on 05/19/2005 10:28:07 AM PDT by maxter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I called DeWiner's office. The gal that answered the phone was very nice and she was being bombarded with calls.


936 posted on 05/19/2005 10:28:16 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (this tagline is currently being filibustered by Democrats, NUKULAR option coming soon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Well Frist, Specter, Lott, Sessions, Bond, Smith, McConnell, Hutchinson. I think that's all the Republicans.
Dems: Stabenow, Reid, Schumer,

Anyone else gang?


937 posted on 05/19/2005 10:28:21 AM PDT by defconw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Hatch commenting about the fact that Sessions had previously been denied a judgeship by the DemonicRats and now he is a member of the Judiciary Committee.....
938 posted on 05/19/2005 10:29:03 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 930 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

It means that Congress could "vest" (delegate) appointment power of lower appealant court judges (exclusive of the supreme Court) in the President alone by writing such a law.

Don't look for Congress to approve a law which takes that much power away from the Senate, but it could be done. Likewise, in the subsiquent congress, such a law could be repealed as any law can be repealed.


939 posted on 05/19/2005 10:29:22 AM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Good!


940 posted on 05/19/2005 10:30:10 AM PDT by Howlin (No Judge "LEFT BEHIND!" - No Deal!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 936 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 3,721-3,738 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson