Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(DAY-2) LIVE U.S. SENATE "Nuclear" THREAD: for judicial nominations: C-span 2 - 9:30 am EST
http://www.c-span.org ^ | http://www.c-span.org | http://www.c-span.org

Posted on 05/18/2005 10:21:08 PM PDT by davidosborne

Text Credit to Ken5050: DAY-1 THREAD

Welcome, all you Freepers, to the continuing C-span soap operas about judicial nominations. "The Guiding SEARCHLIGHT, " "As the SENATE Turns, "One NOMINATION to Live" "GERIATRIC Hospital" (for all you Byrd and Lautenberg fans out there). Follow along with us, as the Dems raise the level of histrionics, bloviation, pontification, and all around bad acting to new highs, er, lows...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; 8hoursearly; constitutionaloption; democratnukereaction; filibuster; may19th2005; obstructionistdems; reidsnuclearreaction; showdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 3,721-3,738 next last
To: princess leah

You can't reason with crybabys. The dems look like spoiled brats.


901 posted on 05/19/2005 10:17:40 AM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Explain away this:

On June 13, 1787, it was originally proposed that judges be “appointed by the national Legislature,” and that was rejected; Madison objected and made the alternative motion that appointments be made by the Senate, and that was at first approved. Madison specifically proposed that a “supermajority” be required for judicial appointments but this was rejected. On July 18, Nathaniel Ghorum made the alternative motion “that the Judges be appointed by the Executive with the advice & consent of the 2d branch,” (following on the practice in Massachusetts at that time). Finally, on Friday, September 7, 1787, the Convention approved the final Appointments Clause, making the president primary and the Senate (alone) secondary, with a role of “advice and consent.” NOTABLY WITHOUT SUPERMAJORITY LANGUAGE. The Founders understood what plain language meant. The absence of "supermajority" determined that "majority" was meant. Period. Take a look at articles in (link for one is in following post): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1406147/posts?page=37#37

902 posted on 05/19/2005 10:17:59 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Peach; Howlin

Here's something to ponder..after the 2006 election, when the Dems lose more seats in the House and Senate, can the Dems go into the 2008 WH race with Dean, Reid, and Pelosi as the leadership..the face of the party?..Obviously not..so all three get tossed..but who replaced them. You're gonna see a huge intraparty fight...


903 posted on 05/19/2005 10:19:15 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 896 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

Lott is on board with Frist completely here. He is not as spineless as his supercritics lead you to believe.


904 posted on 05/19/2005 10:19:28 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies]

To: All

Go Jeff Go! He is smacking the Dems good now!


905 posted on 05/19/2005 10:19:36 AM PDT by defconw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

LOL!

Fastpitch eh,....sports are good for kids.....


906 posted on 05/19/2005 10:19:36 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
You can't reason with crybabys

Right! THey need indefinite time-outs.

907 posted on 05/19/2005 10:19:54 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (red, red voter in a blue, blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 901 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Forgivew my ignorance, but does this mean that when dems say they will stop all legislative activity, they are really shooting themselves in the foot- if they don't show up, those that do will simply pass legislation without any opposition?
908 posted on 05/19/2005 10:20:17 AM PDT by the anti-liberal (It's time the left - left!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Please help me here. Here is the Clause:

Clause 2: He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

Here is what I am having problems comprehending:

but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

What is meant by "vest the Appointment"?
909 posted on 05/19/2005 10:20:33 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty ("Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." —Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Good grandma...I'm very comfortable now with warming the bottle..


910 posted on 05/19/2005 10:20:47 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

I'm trusting you're correct... I just still have a bad taste from all the shared power after the 2000 election. That was total bs.


911 posted on 05/19/2005 10:21:08 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (red, red voter in a blue, blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 904 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
If he wasn't he would be out there turning the tables on Reid, like the lefties did to him....something like,

"This morning, The minority leader was quoted making a thinly veiled racial epithet at Justice Brown, saying in fact,

"When Americans think of a scary person in a black robe, they should be thinking of Darth Vader, not Republican choices for judges"

"Frankly I was astounded that the man who was just chastised for calling the President a loser, would engage in race baiting unparalleled by a US Senator since Senator Byrd said that he would not fight,"with a Negro by my side. Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds."

912 posted on 05/19/2005 10:21:41 AM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you dont have to...." ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 904 | View Replies]

To: maxter

Sen Bond did us proud!


913 posted on 05/19/2005 10:21:57 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
The best way to look at this is probably by going back to the Congressional record and start actually looking at the counts. Many times they say 2/3 concurring or whatever. But you have to examine it in a special way...There were only the Colonial States at the time, we were a One Party system (which would soon change) and it was difficult to get there. I think I remember votes being taken with just the necessary quorum present and a majority vote (or whatever) of those present as sufficient. But you can see the procedures quite clearly.

If I'm wrong on any of this, mea culpa...It's from memory.

914 posted on 05/19/2005 10:21:59 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
Right! THey need indefinite time-outs.

After a good hard spanking.

915 posted on 05/19/2005 10:22:30 AM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

Is there a running list anywheres of who has already spoken, on both sides?


916 posted on 05/19/2005 10:22:58 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 911 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
I think this retreat Sessions is talking about is the one that took place in Aspen CO.(IIRC)
917 posted on 05/19/2005 10:23:22 AM PDT by OXENinFLA ("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded
What is meant by "vest the Appointment"?

"give control" of or "give authority for" the appointment.

918 posted on 05/19/2005 10:23:44 AM PDT by RobFromGa (Enact Constitutional Option Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 909 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Dunno... I missed 95% of this morning's festivities.
919 posted on 05/19/2005 10:23:45 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (red, red voter in a blue, blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]

To: soloNYer

** Heard a caller on C-Span this morning say "I am a Democrat, always vote Democrat...although I do vote for McCain." **

That's pretty funny. McCain needs some demos to vote for him since Republicans don't want to do it. Maybe McCain won his last election with Demo votes. No wonder a Demo can't beat McCain. hehehehe


920 posted on 05/19/2005 10:23:52 AM PDT by Pepper777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 3,721-3,738 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson