Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(DAY-2) LIVE U.S. SENATE "Nuclear" THREAD: for judicial nominations: C-span 2 - 9:30 am EST
http://www.c-span.org ^ | http://www.c-span.org | http://www.c-span.org

Posted on 05/18/2005 10:21:08 PM PDT by davidosborne

Text Credit to Ken5050: DAY-1 THREAD

Welcome, all you Freepers, to the continuing C-span soap operas about judicial nominations. "The Guiding SEARCHLIGHT, " "As the SENATE Turns, "One NOMINATION to Live" "GERIATRIC Hospital" (for all you Byrd and Lautenberg fans out there). Follow along with us, as the Dems raise the level of histrionics, bloviation, pontification, and all around bad acting to new highs, er, lows...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; 8hoursearly; constitutionaloption; democratnukereaction; filibuster; may19th2005; obstructionistdems; reidsnuclearreaction; showdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 3,721-3,738 next last
To: Txsleuth

Kristol has his head so far up McCain's rectum.


701 posted on 05/19/2005 9:23:29 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 690 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

they're=their...


702 posted on 05/19/2005 9:23:42 AM PDT by the anti-liberal (It's time the left - left!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

So the minority RINO's have control over you?


703 posted on 05/19/2005 9:23:51 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: greasepaint

What is so d*mned complicated about voting UP or DOWN? The pathetic dems can voice their disent by voting "NO". Everyone gets a one-word chance to show his approval or disapproval MINUS the endless repetitions of bogus "facts".


704 posted on 05/19/2005 9:23:56 AM PDT by Carolinamom (Dem & RINO senators have "eaten on the insane root that takes the reason prisoner."---.Macbeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

Kristol is often wrong.


He may also have been talking BEFORE he knew the meeting broke up. Let's hope so!!


705 posted on 05/19/2005 9:23:56 AM PDT by Primetimedonna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

This is true. :-)


706 posted on 05/19/2005 9:23:57 AM PDT by Howlin (No Judge "LEFT BEHIND!" - No Deal!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Still haven't responded to mine - so you are saying that the entire committee approval system is unconstitutional?


707 posted on 05/19/2005 9:24:08 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Anything short of an up or down vote on the floor by ALL the senators on all the nominees NOW is not acceptable to me.

I'm sick to death of compromising with this pack of liars.


708 posted on 05/19/2005 9:25:08 AM PDT by Howlin (No Judge "LEFT BEHIND!" - No Deal!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]

To: jackbill

Bill "The Gerbil" Kristol. lol


709 posted on 05/19/2005 9:25:09 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (red, red voter in a blue, blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies]

To: MarcusTulliusCicero

12 absent Senators indicates Senators who did not want to go on the record. They were probably not in favor of Fortas, because if they were in favor of him they would not have stayed away from the Senate floor.


710 posted on 05/19/2005 9:25:22 AM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 689 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
I think we are just agreeing with each other on this point. The president deserves to have his nominees voted on, as a matter of Constitutional principle.

The point is argued, obviously. I also find myself moving into other related aguments and discussion, some of which invlove how the Rules paly, and others that consider how parliamentary procedure plays.

711 posted on 05/19/2005 9:25:30 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Yep. Can't know both at the same time beyond Heisenberg's uncertanity principle...


712 posted on 05/19/2005 9:25:37 AM PDT by Truth Table
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: Truth Table

"Roller coaster news"....Going back and forth between channels in a rythmic fashion.


713 posted on 05/19/2005 9:25:52 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Took the words right "outta" my mouth! This is ridiculous.


714 posted on 05/19/2005 9:25:58 AM PDT by Kylie_04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; jackbill
Kristol is smarmy. He was saying that he himself preferred an end to judicial filibusters, and yet you could clearly see that he was hoping for "a deal." He stopped short of predicting that there would be a deal. In fact, he was wandering all over the place, essentially taking 3 or 4 minutes to say nothing.

I think all Kristol has is wishful thinking, rather than hard info that the compromise talks are still alive.

715 posted on 05/19/2005 9:26:17 AM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (UNC Tar Heels: NCAA Basketball Champions 1957/1982/1993/2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 684 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

whew....just catching up....Kristol needs a muzzle. All mutts do.

I don't like "compromises" I don't even like the word! :(


716 posted on 05/19/2005 9:26:28 AM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 690 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

NO ONE, especially people who can't lead, have control over me. I can't believe the GOP WILL lose this historic opportunity to shape the courts for years to come, but if they DO, I'm gone.


717 posted on 05/19/2005 9:26:59 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

He says the rumor is pretty much the same old deal except change 'extreme' to 'extraordinary' but the couldn't define 'extraordinary' (big surprise there eh?).


718 posted on 05/19/2005 9:27:04 AM PDT by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
I wouldn't be surprised to see the RATS start voting for cloture and allow candidates to be voted-on one-by-one. Each would be subjected to this posturing and bolivating followed by a cloture vote and passage.

They are just delaying and hoping their media butt-wipes will wear down the people.

719 posted on 05/19/2005 9:27:15 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (Don't let Terri's death be in vain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
What is so d*mned complicated about voting UP or DOWN? The pathetic dems can voice their disent by voting "NO".

The dems are having a tantrum by holding their breath till their faces are blue.

They are not being rational.

720 posted on 05/19/2005 9:27:28 AM PDT by the anti-liberal (It's time the left - left!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 3,721-3,738 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson