Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Soul Seeker
I am telling you, regardless of what we do with the judges, if the democrats get back control of the Senate, they will immediately change the rules to totally abolish the filibuster. Kennedy just telegraphed it, saying we would use this option to pass legislation the democrats would filibuster.

Mark my words, they will do it immediately should they get the majority. And it will be done even if we backed away from this fight and let them keep it.

1,745 posted on 05/18/2005 12:30:47 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1730 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple

Changing the filibuster for legislation is unconstitutional. Let them try.


1,751 posted on 05/18/2005 12:32:33 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Rats theme song: "Whatever it is...I'm AGAINST it!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
Democrats are going to have a hard time taking back the Senate. They are almost done in the South.
1,758 posted on 05/18/2005 12:33:30 PM PDT by badgerbengal (close the border and open fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

Of course it would. The Democrats don't play by the rules. that's why this objection we should reserve the filibuster for our use is absurd, on more than one level. We know what this group of Democrats would do and that is why they must be crushed.

I'm of the opinion they need to wander the wildness for 40 years till they die and an uncorrupted generation assumes control of the party.


1,761 posted on 05/18/2005 12:33:57 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple
Mark my words, they will do it immediately should they get the majority. And it will be done even if we backed away from this fight and let them keep it.

This is absolutely true and cannot be repeated often enough.

The Democrats have shown remarkable party discipline in the minority--no reason to believe they'd behave differently as the majority. The filibuster will end--the only question is whether it happens now, while we are in the majority, or later, when we are not.

1,768 posted on 05/18/2005 12:34:59 PM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

Of course you are right. I don't have the TV on right now, but even without Kennedy's or anybody else's words it's apparent this is what they'd do.

And not blink an eye.


1,772 posted on 05/18/2005 12:35:29 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democrat Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

when I look back to see that ruth bader ginsburg was approved 96-3, I don't worry that a future republican minority is going to lose the ability to fillibuster judges - they wouldn't use it anyway.


1,785 posted on 05/18/2005 12:38:33 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

To me, that is the heart of this matter: they WOULD do it, so we HAVE to do it while we can have some sort of influence on the courts, etc.


1,965 posted on 05/18/2005 1:48:35 PM PDT by Howlin (North Carolina, where beer kegs are registered and illegal aliens run free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson