Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plan would close venerable Army hospital - Walter Reed Medical Center
Monterey Herald ^ | 5/13/05 | Robert Burns - AP

Posted on 05/13/2005 6:15:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon wants to close the Army's century-old hospital at Walter Reed Medical Center, the world-renowned facility in the nation's capital that has treated presidents and foreign leaders as well as soldiers and veterans.

The proposal is part of a broad reordering of the military's system for medical education, research and care, which the Pentagon says suffers from a mismatch of needs and resources.

Inpatient services would be curtailed at some military bases, and some facilities would be consolidated. Under the plan, the shuttering of Walter Reed would involve moving some of its staff and services to an expanded health care facility on the campus of the National Naval Medical Center in nearby Bethesda, Md. The new facility would retain the Walter Reed name, officials said.

"It will rival Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins and the other great medical institutions of the world," Lt. Gen. George Taylor, the Air Force surgeon general, told a Pentagon news conference, referring to the new Walter Reed.

The plan is contained in Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's recommendations for base closings and realignments, which he submitted Friday to an independent base closing commission and to Congress. Pentagon officials said they expect some elements of the medical proposals to stir controversy, particularly the closure of Walter Reed, the most famous military hospital.

Dr. William Winkenwerder, the assistant secretary of defense for health affairs, said Rumsfeld wants to use the base consolidation - the military's first since 1995 - as an opportunity to gain efficiencies in the medical care system and better position it for the 21st century.

"It is a plan that allows us to invest in and modernize key flagship facilities," he said in an interview.

After spending an estimated $2.4 billion to make these changes over the coming six years, the Pentagon projects that it would then yield a net savings of $400 million a year thereafter.

Walter Reed hospital first opened in 1909 and has treated presidents, members of Congress and foreign leaders, in addition to members of the armed forces and veterans. Today it admits about 16,000 patients a year. They include hundreds of the more seriously wounded soldiers from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The far larger Navy hospital at Bethesda opened in 1942.

Research at Walter Reed's satellite Forest Glen facility at Silver Spring, Md., will be expanded.

Among other proposed changes:

_ Build a new 165-bed hospital at Fort Belvoir, Va., just south of Washington. Creating the expanded facility in Bethesda - to be renamed the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center at Bethesda - and building the new hospital at Fort Belvoir will cost a combined $1 billion, according to Taylor, who directed a multi-service group that developed the overall plan for changing the medical care delivery system.

Taylor said Thursday that the 450,000 military beneficiaries in the Washington area who currently rely on Walter Reed and Bethesda will see no net decline in health care services. And once the changes are completed, the Pentagon will be able to run the military medical care system in the national capital region for $100 million a year less than it costs today, he said.

_ Similar to the merging of Walter Reed and Bethesda services for the Washington area, the Pentagon would create a single, expanded medical center for the San Antonio area by closing Wilford Hall Medical Center at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, and moving its resources to the 450-bed Brooke Army Medical Center at Fort Sam Houston in northeastern San Antonio.

Brooke also would expand its trauma services. The Pentagon would build a new outpatient, same-day surgical center at Lackland.

_ Fort Sam Houston would get a new medical training center for enlisted personnel from all the services. Currently each service sends its enlisted people to separate sites for this training - Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas; Fort Sam Houston and Navy bases in Virginia, Illinois and California.

_ Fort Sam Houston also will be the home of a new "center of excellence" in battlefield health and trauma, to be staffed by people from all the military services. Similar joint-service centers will be created elsewhere for other specialties like infectious disease research.

Fort Sam Houston overall would gain about 9,000 positions. Lackland would lose a few thousand.

_ Medical centers on nine military bases in eight states will close their inpatient care facilities and become same-day surgical centers. They are at Fort Eustis, Va., Fort Knox, Ky., Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, N.C., the Great Lakes Naval Training Center in Illinois, Andrews Air Force Base, Md., MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., Scott Air Force Base, Ill., Keesler Air Force Base, Miss., and the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colo.

_ The aerospace medicine program at Brooks City-Base - formerly Brooks Air Force Base - in San Antonio would be moved to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. Wright-Patterson also would obtain the Navy's aero-medical research laboratory now located at Pensacola, Fla.

_ All military functions at Brooks City-Base would cease, Taylor said. The Pentagon currently leases the space it has used there from the city of San Antonio. "We're not shutting the doors to the place. We'll simply remove the military structure at Brooks City-Base," Taylor said.

---

Walter Reed Army Medical Center at http://www.wramc.amedd.army.mil/

National Naval Medical Center at Bethesda at http://www.bethesda.med.navy.mil/


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: armyhospital; brac; close; healthcare; medicalcenter; va; veterans; walterreed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: PhiKapMom

and he is (W)right :)


I work at NASIC now...


21 posted on 05/13/2005 6:59:09 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (I joined the EEEVVIILLLL Sam's Club on Friday, April 22nd, 2005.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Raffus

Wright-Patterson is home to Air Force Materiel Command Headqarters which consolidated AF Logistics and AF Systems Commands together.

They also have Air Force Information Technology which is like a college along with some of the best research labs in the Country. Also home to The National Air and Space Intelligence Center and a host of other things.

AF Museum is a small part of Wright-Patterson but if you are in the area, you have to visit the Museum -- they have done an outstanding job with the Museum.


22 posted on 05/13/2005 7:12:44 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for Oklahoma Governor -- Run J.C. Run; Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Did they consolidate FTD into where you work now? FTD used to give daily updates to the AFLC Commander when I worked in the HQ Command Section.


23 posted on 05/13/2005 7:14:29 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for Oklahoma Governor -- Run J.C. Run; Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
Mike - I'm not sure what CACI is (?) I wanted to go into the military as a young (skinny by birth) small women (in 1984 would have been laughable). I work vigilantly for GD for my programs because I love our military men and women.
24 posted on 05/13/2005 7:16:57 PM PDT by Raffus (Thanks to all Veterans for their service to the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Yes, I'd LOVE to visit tha great base of our great country. Thanks for the info. WP - I do not deal with them on a day-to-day transaction basis. We deal with Warner Robins AFB mostly and I'm just damn saddened by the base closings in general.


25 posted on 05/13/2005 7:26:10 PM PDT by Raffus (Thanks to all Veterans for their service to the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Guess I am a little confused. Walter Reed was completely and I do mean completely updated and remodeled in the late 1970s. Basically gutted and tore down and rebuilt all except the central front facade. I know I was there.


26 posted on 05/13/2005 7:30:00 PM PDT by waRNmother.armyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: waRNmother.armyboots

Just for your info the 70's was 30 years ago.


27 posted on 05/13/2005 7:40:38 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Gamecock

It's been a number of years since I've been there, but I remember WRAMC being a bit of a dump in a run-down, poorly accessible area.

The bottom line is that it's just a campus with old buildings.


28 posted on 05/13/2005 7:45:12 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

I do realize it was 30 years ago, but that is not an 100 year old falling down facility. How many community hospitals are tore down because they are over 30 years old. Answer...none. They are updated, not tore down. Too expensive to rebuild from ground up. By the way, I am a nurse with over 30 years experience both in the military and civilian world. If we are going to start tearing down hospitals because they are over thirty years old our country is in a lot of trouble.


29 posted on 05/13/2005 7:46:12 PM PDT by waRNmother.armyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I do not know when you were there. I was there in the mid 70s when it was being remodeled. It is in a poor part of town. It was not a dump with crumbling buildings when I was there, but I can not account for what the Carter years or Clinton years may have done to the facility.


30 posted on 05/13/2005 7:48:32 PM PDT by waRNmother.armyboots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: waRNmother.armyboots

I guess my point is that it's not like the buildings are sacred or anything. They're just brick and mortar.

More important is that it's in an extremely high cost area, and that a better facility elsewhere will cost far less. In many ways, those who are assigned to those locations are the ones who take it in the chin with the cost of living issues. The same for the New Jersey bases....especially Monmouth. The same for Atlanta's Ft MacPherson.

Just buildings.


31 posted on 05/13/2005 7:52:57 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I think it comes from a person who is worried about the welfare of our nation. If you tell me where you got your copy of anarchist/communist propaganda I would be willing to take a look at it.
Whatever you do though, don't question anything that is currently happening in our nation because it might hinder H.Clinton from taking the White House in 08 and the liberals regaining the Senate and House.


32 posted on 05/13/2005 8:58:39 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Is NOTHING!!! different than nothing?


33 posted on 05/13/2005 9:00:01 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Raffus

Have to admit I am a very happy person tonight. We were at Norton AFB, CA, and it closed, McClellan AFB, CA, and it closed, and Kelly AFB, TX, and it closed. Tonight Tinker AFB stays open and gains -- after going through the last two base closures sitting in front of the TV wondering where the family would end up next, this was a great day here in OK with this round of base closings.

We had just built a new house in Texas and had lived in it less than a year when the last BRAC was announced and shortly thereafter we came to Tinker AFB as part of the first group up here. Figured Tinker, Robins, and Hill were safe this time around because the AF cannot afford to lose anymore depot capacity.


34 posted on 05/13/2005 9:56:24 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for Oklahoma Governor -- Run J.C. Run; Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
When I was a kid, my absolute favorite cousin was in Walter Reed being treated for cancer that was discovered when he was in the Army. The prognosis was not good. His Mom, (also my favorite Aunt) was there to visit him, and one day she was leaving his room and literally "bumped into" President Eisenhower in the hallway. My aunt had tears in her eyes and Ike asked her who she was visiting. She told him the story and he took her back to her son's room and spent time with both of them.

Needless to say, in 1960, my cousin did not make it, but Ike's warmth and compassion for my aunt and her soldier son, did make a difference for her.

35 posted on 05/13/2005 10:07:44 PM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

My youngest son was born at Walter Reed but time marches on. A newer facility would be more cost effective and could provide a better environment for the newest equipment, etc.


36 posted on 05/13/2005 11:30:17 PM PDT by zip (.Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 48% of Americans (NRA)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It's a dump.

On the other side of the coin they are converting Wilford Hall (San Antonio) into a clinic and shifting ops to Brooke Army Medical Center.

That will leave San Antonio with 2 level one trauma centers. Many here will say so what, the military shouldn't be providing civilian trauma care. I see it from a different perspective: Military docs, nurses, and medics in training need that experience in trauma care before they go down range.
37 posted on 05/14/2005 1:33:25 AM PDT by Gamecock (We are not saved by faith, but by the object of our faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
having just been here at Wright Pat for nearly 5 months now

How long do you have to be there before they let you see the alien corpses? :)
38 posted on 05/14/2005 3:49:42 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Walter Reed also has a great albiet strange Pathology Museum. I hope they save that for elsewhere. It has the bullet that killed Lincoln, the leg of some famous General from the Civil War, jars of strange deformaties like 2 headed babies, etc. A whole collection of weird things they've collected over the years to study Pathology.


39 posted on 05/14/2005 4:04:12 AM PDT by KillTime (Western Civilization herself breathes a sigh of relief as President Bush wins 4 more years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waRNmother.armyboots

I was also at WRAMC in the late 70's-early 80's. What department were you in? Perhaps our paths crossed. I was chief of radiation oncology at the time.


40 posted on 05/14/2005 4:20:41 AM PDT by SC DOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson