Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US senators will get 'good hiding' pledges Galloway
Telegraph ^ | 05/13/05 | Ben Russell and Andrew Buncombe

Posted on 05/13/2005 6:26:07 AM PDT by Pikamax

US senators will get 'good hiding' pledges Galloway

By Ben Russell and Andrew Buncombe in Washington

13 May 2005 George Galloway pledged that he would give a "bloody good hiding" to a US Senate committee over accusations that he was granted allocations for millions of barrels of oil from Saddam Hussein's regime.

Mr Galloway said he would fly to Washington next week to defend himself in person against allegations about the UN's oil-for-food programme published by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

The anti-war Respect MP for Bethnal Green and Bow denied claims in the committee's report that Iraqi documents and interviews with senior figures in Saddam's regime showed he was granted allocations of oil under the programme.

He denounced the committee for publishing the claims without giving him the opportunity to answer the allegations. He said: "Even in Kafka there was a trial of sorts."

Mr Galloway will face the committee next week after its Republican chairman, Norm Coleman, issued an invitation for him to appear on Tuesday. The firebrand left-winger will clash with Mr Coleman, the ambitious freshman senator for Minnesota whose website says that "full-throated debate on the issues of the day" were always on the menu at his childhood kitchen table.

A spokesman for Senator Coleman said Mr Galloway would be invited to appear at a meeting entitled "Oil For Influence: How Saddam Used Oil to Reward Politicians and Terrorist Entities Under the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme." He said: "The hearing will begin promptly at 9.30am and there will be a witness chair and microphone available for Mr Galloway's use."

Mr Galloway said he would accuse the committee of producing a "travesty" of natural justice.

He said: "I'm going to call them a bunch of liars.

"I'll be there to give them both barrels - verbal guns, of course, not oil - assuming we get the visas. I welcome the opportunity to clear my name. My first words will be 'Senator, it's a pity that we are having this interview after you have found me guilty.'

"This is a right-wing committee with an agenda that reached its conclusion before even considering the facts. Joseph McCarthy must be smiling admiringly in Hades."

The committee's report said Mr Galloway was named in documents from Iraq's ministry of oil.

A spokesman for the committee confirmed it had no evidence Mr Galloway benefited financially from the alleged allocation of 20 million barrels of oil.

"We have presented the evidence that the allocations were granted," Tom Steward, a spokesman for Senator Coleman, told The Independent.

"That was confirmed by the senior Iraqi government officials we spoke to. They knew he was being rewarded for his support for the regime. [But] we don't have the paperwork to confirm the final element of the transaction."

Mr Galloway said: "I have no problem with anybody investigating the oil-for-food programme because I had nothing to do with the oil-for-food programme in any shape or form.

"I have never traded in anything with Iraq and neither has anybody on my behalf. I have never profited a single penny piece from my work in Iraq."

He added: "The point is, who knows who wrote my name on that piece of paper and when they wrote it."

Mr Galloway said he contacted the US Senate to put his point of view, but had not been contacted by the committee to give evidence. But a spokesman claimed that "at no time did Mr Galloway contact the [committee] by any means, including but not limited to telephone, fax, e-mail, letter, Morse code or carrier pigeon."

The committee said it had sought to inform Mr Galloway of the allegations.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: galloway; georgegalloway; gorgeousgeorge; oilforfood; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Coleman better have a good grasp on this hearing because Galloway is looking to grandstand and preen worse than Boxer and Biden combined.
1 posted on 05/13/2005 6:26:07 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

When I read the headline I thought it meant that Galloway will give the Democrats good tips on hiding illegal money. LOL

Coleman will be in top form, hopefully.


2 posted on 05/13/2005 6:27:15 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Hey Gallaway, bring it on you preening little sissyboy. You want to give a good bloody hiding? Well, our Lady Senator from Texas can kick your metrosexual arse back across the pond.


3 posted on 05/13/2005 6:28:08 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Anyone care to speculate on the over/under for the number of apologies issued/implied to Galloway by the Democratic members of the Commitee?


4 posted on 05/13/2005 6:29:57 AM PDT by DamascusRoad (Bay Area National Geological Preserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Joseph McCarthy must be smiling admiringly in Hades

There's nothing wrong with George Galloway that a good old-fashioned American Louisville Slugger couldn't straighten out in five minutes.

5 posted on 05/13/2005 6:31:13 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Joe McCarthy wasn't all that wrong..IMHO


6 posted on 05/13/2005 6:31:26 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"Joseph McCarthy must be smiling admiringly in Hades."

Ignore the facts McCarthy was right.

7 posted on 05/13/2005 6:40:15 AM PDT by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Just watch the Democrats on the committee circle the wagons around their fellow socialist/traitor from across the sea.


8 posted on 05/13/2005 6:42:45 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I'll bet Galloway never shows up.


9 posted on 05/13/2005 6:43:23 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Typical fargin' liberal bastage.

Rather than say "I welcome the opportunity to clear my name" or something similarly civilised, he runs right away to paint himself as a victim and to try to paint Republicans as evil, bigoted and conniving.

Stalin is probably smiling about his European legacy somewhere down in Hades.


10 posted on 05/13/2005 6:43:30 AM PDT by HowardDeanScream08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
There's nothing wrong with George Galloway that a good old-fashioned American Louisville Slugger couldn't straighten out in five minutes.

Please feel free. I certainly don't want him back here polluting our House of Commons. If you have a strong stomach and want to see what he stands for -

Galloway's Party

Regards, Ivan

11 posted on 05/13/2005 6:44:46 AM PDT by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
I'll repeat what I stated yesterday on http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1402126/posts?page=10#10


I'd wager the British lunatic Galloway ...


12 posted on 05/13/2005 6:45:12 AM PDT by G.Mason ( Save the Republic from the shallow, demagogic sectarians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HowardDeanScream08

Galloway tried to blame his extramarital affairs, or rather, news of them reaching his wife's ears, on the Prime Minister and President Bush.

He's a sick, twisted individual.

Regards, Ivan


13 posted on 05/13/2005 6:45:42 AM PDT by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

To borrow a phrase, I think he's a classic "Girly-Man."


14 posted on 05/13/2005 6:48:32 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

The John Batchelor Show last night claimed that The Coleman Committee has a paper trail on Calloway and will shred him.


15 posted on 05/13/2005 7:29:51 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I really hope you guys kick his butt.


16 posted on 05/13/2005 7:30:50 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

"I'll bet Galloway never shows up."

My first reaction as well. If he were intending to show up, he wouldn't have threatened the committee. On the other hand, he might use the opportunity, in collusion with the Rats, to carry on about our faulty intelligence on WMD and then launch generally into a condemnation of the war. He might even go so far as to get himself thrown out of the hearing. The alphabet MSM will lead off their evening coverage with the leftist propaganda show.


17 posted on 05/13/2005 7:36:48 AM PDT by laishly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Ivan,

What in hell is going on in Bethnal Green and Bow, where this waste of protoplasm was elected? And is that Salma Yaqoob someone to watch?

How did he get back into Parliament? (I know, I know, we bear the shame of the likes of Ted Kennedy, "Sheets" Byrd, "Depends" Leahy, Bill and Hillary Clinton, etc. etc.!!)


18 posted on 05/13/2005 8:49:39 AM PDT by SpinyNorman (Moral relativism is, by definition, the polar opposite of having values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SpinyNorman

To be honest with you, I'm at a loss to explain the collective loss of cognitive function in Bethnal Green & Bow. One of the things I cannot explain is how the Lib Dem candidate fared so badly - not only was he anti-war, he actually was from the area. I would much rather have had him elected than give Galloway a seat in the Commons - it would be the difference between having someone who is merely wrong and someone who is wrong and a criminal. I can only suggest that the locals were not discerning and went for name recognition. They actually believed Galloway when he said he was there to help them and didn't mind he had no connection to the area. In short, George Galloway is the Hillary Clinton of British politics - the only difference being is that he has no help from Labour, and he's too tainted to be very dangerous.

I'm not worried about Salma Yaqoob. At least not yet.

Regards, Ivan



19 posted on 05/13/2005 8:54:32 AM PDT by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

If he comes to our country, seize him for trial.


20 posted on 05/13/2005 8:55:43 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson