Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Even Deep Discounts Can't Move SUVs
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | May 8, 2005 | Michael Taylor

Posted on 05/09/2005 6:52:14 AM PDT by MississippiMasterpiece

It's a Saturday morning on San Leandro's Marina Boulevard auto row, and the big SUVs have been sitting on the lots, waiting for someone to come in and start that dealer dollar dance that ends up with the customer slightly bewildered but paying a lot less for that vehicle than he thought he was going to.

Once in a while, there are takers, although the dealer has to discount the SUV heavily just to get it moving.

Salvador Sotello, for example, recently paid F.H. Dailey Chevrolet in San Leandro $41,000 for a new Chevy Tahoe LT (yes, with leather) SUV that had a sticker price of $58,000. The sale was an anomaly in what is otherwise a pretty dismal selling season. "It's been pretty quiet," saleswoman Crystal Gonzalez said the other day. "Been pretty slow."

At Broadway Ford in Oakland, the grilles of the Mustangs, SUVs and the lone Thunderbird smile at the passing traffic, but the showroom is empty, it appears, of customers; several salesmen are in sight. Up at Albany Ford-Subaru, salesman Myers Howard, sitting a few feet away from a big Ford pickup truck, says things on the Ford side of the showroom "are slow." That might be the understatement of the day.

Just this past week, General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. underwent the humiliation of seeing their credit ratings reduced by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services to the status of junk. The reasons are becoming clear -- the two big companies can't sell much of what they produce.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: autosales; suv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-430 next last
To: brownsfan

What makes you think there is any abuse regarding driving an SUV and the right to drive an SUV could be removed?


101 posted on 05/09/2005 8:05:55 AM PDT by ctlpdad (There can be no triumph without loss, no victory without suffering and no freedom without sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

I didn't know that. I would never buy one, so I've never investigated. Thanks for the correction.


102 posted on 05/09/2005 8:06:14 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

You make a good point, regarding child seats. They are easier to deal with in a higher vehicle.


103 posted on 05/09/2005 8:06:19 AM PDT by B Knotts (Viva il Papa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Why? Intimidated?


104 posted on 05/09/2005 8:06:22 AM PDT by petca-tim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: umgud
My daughter has a Honda Element SUV, it's ugly but gets 25mpg.

What element is that Honda made of? Butt-uglium?

105 posted on 05/09/2005 8:08:09 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wmichgrad
So would it be OK to own an SUV here in MI where we get snow in the winter? Or how about to tow a trailer? Can I use it to cart around my family of 4 plus two dogs and all of our stuff? Can I just drive around by myself on a nice sunny day? Please let me know soon, because I have some errands to run and need to get going. Thanks!

Har! They probably drive Yugos. I'm series.

106 posted on 05/09/2005 8:08:39 AM PDT by MJemison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Forced to drive in the right lane, no passing. Hey, Junior. Why do I get the feeling that you are a single male who has to deal with no one but himself in his little car. No carseats for you, guy. Guys never drive the kiddies around. I would drive a small car if car seats weren't required and I could put my oldest son in the front seat with me where we could talk and bond. Saftey Nazis insist on air bags that require you to put your crying infant child on another row away from the mother and facing backwards, to boot, so you can't even check on him at a stop light. Spend the 20 or so minutes that it takes to properly install a baby in the middle back car seat in a low to the ground car and your back will be screaming for you to work with something higher up.
107 posted on 05/09/2005 8:08:40 AM PDT by sportutegrl (Huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
I can fit 4 adult males with 4 sets of golf clubs in the trunk.

Wouldn't the 4 adult males be more comfortable if they were sitting in the front and rear seats? I mean, you've got a heck of a lotta trunk space, but you have to draw the line somewhere... :)

108 posted on 05/09/2005 8:08:47 AM PDT by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Good post. Isn't it ironic that the cars being pushed as being most "environmentally friendly," are, in fact, designed to be disposable?

Diesels, on the other hand, keep going and going.

109 posted on 05/09/2005 8:09:06 AM PDT by B Knotts (Viva il Papa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

All-important cup holder
He opens the driver's door and points out the cup holder, which sits in front of the floor-mounted gearshift. In "Park," the gearshift obscures the cup holder.

"You come out of Starbucks with your big cup, and you can't put it in the cup holder," he says. "It's the small things that add up. A cup holder becomes a major thing to a customer. If he can't get to it, what good is it?"



WTF is this obscession with the cup holder? Is it the MOST IMPORTANT part of a car? What a priority...
Why not to design a PERFECT cup holder and bolt to it some engine, body and wheels... :o)

Is it what the customer demands ??


110 posted on 05/09/2005 8:09:19 AM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Fer cryin out loud! When the station wagon, the most common American family car was phased out of production, something had to replace it! The Chrysler mini-van and then an entire hoard of me-too's did so from the other manufacturers. The Caprice wagons, Country Seadans, Cutlass wagons, and even Fairmont wagons were scrapped for the minivan craze. The minivan craze then became the SUV thru evolution and default. People found out you couldn't tow anything with a front wheel drive minivan, so they turned to the next thing up, trucks and truck style wagons. If the auto makers would respond by giving us the American rear wheel drive station wagon back(like Chrysler has begun to do), the SUV craze would wither on the vine.


111 posted on 05/09/2005 8:09:20 AM PDT by blackdog (British cars, airplanes, furniture, and women.......Only the classics will do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

"...but are being used as in-town transportation by a single, solitary 5' 3" female yakking on a cell phone who can barely see over the dashboard."

Your experience agress with mine.


112 posted on 05/09/2005 8:12:03 AM PDT by brownsfan (Post No Bills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

Nope. I've already pointed out that I have no problem with the mid-sized vehicles. I simply cannot stand those LOS-blocking behemoths. My gripe is specifically with vehicles like the Suburban and the Navigator. Like I said, if I can't see around your vehicle to the road ahead (and I drive a Ford Ranger), don't ever expect me to allow you to merge in front of me. If you have a Jimmy or something similar, and you don't have 90 percent tint on your windows, I really don't have a problem with you.


113 posted on 05/09/2005 8:12:52 AM PDT by Junior (“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Junior
A minivan does not block the line of sight in the manner the largest SUVs and regular vans do.

What are you suggesting, a least-common denominator when it comes to vehichle design? Is everyone expected to drive around in a Geo Metro?

You reference line-of-site as a contributor to fatal accidents, but why is that only an SUV problem? Why isn't LOS affected by buses, construction vehicles, or for other reasons (such as the following vehicle was traveling too darn closely to the SUV in front of them?) By the way, that was a rhetorical question: LOS is affected by many things, and it's not exclusively an SUV problem.

114 posted on 05/09/2005 8:13:22 AM PDT by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

They are hiddeous, aren't they? They look like something the old Soviet Union would have built.


115 posted on 05/09/2005 8:15:42 AM PDT by Junior (“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

How is that idea a problem for you?

Why do you wash your hands? When others don't?

Why do you wear a seat belt? When others don't?

Why do you see a doctor and get imunizations ??

You see, You have the same attitude as those people you just dont realize it. Because if you didnt, you would chose not to immunize yourself, or choose not to wash your hands, or wear a seatbelt.


116 posted on 05/09/2005 8:16:41 AM PDT by Walkingfeather (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Suckers are born every minute.

On a more positive note however, DC is uping production of the Diesel Liberty, and will be looking into expanding their oil-burner offerings in N.America.

So, at least common sense still exists, if not common.


117 posted on 05/09/2005 8:17:05 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Why are 6 or 7 SUV's in a row any more ridiculous than 6 or 7 minivans? or 6 or 7 station wagons?


118 posted on 05/09/2005 8:19:03 AM PDT by bert (Rename Times Square......... Rudy Square.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I would be willing to pay $6/gallon just to get rid of all the SUVs on the road.

Okay, then. I'll give you the chance to put your money where your mouth is. You pay your $2.50, or whatever, a gallon, send the extra $3.50 a gallon to me, and I promise not to buy an SUV.

(My Wrangler doesn't count, right? It's not really an SUV)

119 posted on 05/09/2005 8:19:07 AM PDT by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Shawnlaw

"What a moron liberal suckup you are."

I'm glad to see you can keep this to an intellectual debate. Or, perhaps, that's as intellectual as you are capable of being?


120 posted on 05/09/2005 8:19:24 AM PDT by brownsfan (Post No Bills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-430 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson