Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to prosecute the Free Republic vandal outright. (Vanity)
today | By Lazamataz

Posted on 05/09/2005 5:54:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz

There is an internet vandal who defaces Free Republic with very gross pictures (homosexual sex and stuff from rotton.com) as well as posting "ALL YOU F***** N*****S & JEWS SHOULD BE LYNCHED".

He pings a variety of people to his post, ensuring that the trash is still in their My Posts lists.

To me, this isn't the milder form of harassment that Eschoir engaged in so many years ago. The very worst he would do is ask if you ever committed sodomy, and he once used the screen name "Paula Jones Tw*t". This is mild.

What this sick piece of work is doing is much more egregious. I believe it crosses the line into criminal defacement and restraint of trade. Are there any Free Republic lawyers (especially prosecutors) who can address this issue, and are there any private detectives with internet savvy that will help track the identity of this person down?


TOPICS: Free Republic; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: criminal; democratsarescum; dontbelieveit; eris; getahobby; gypsum; james54; lawyer; lawyers; lazisbored; lazlookingforwork; potmeetkettle; profanity; prosecution; prosecutors; troll; vandal; vandalism; waaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,401-1,415 next last
To: Owl_Eagle

Heh. I was wondering if that was you.


521 posted on 05/09/2005 8:57:37 AM PDT by Sam's Army (Fight them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: Hand em their arse
personally, I'd rather see you beat the shit out of him, laz.... but that's just me?

. . . why should he get to hog all the fun ?

522 posted on 05/09/2005 8:57:55 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I didn't notice the day. Were you getting it before that?


523 posted on 05/09/2005 8:58:09 AM PDT by Bella_Bru (www.JewsforJudaism.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Dear SJackson,

I note that your links indicate that it is a difficult area in which to prosecute. I note as well, from the ADL site, this:

"Blanket statements expressing hatred of an ethnic, racial or religious nature are protected by the First Amendment, even if those statements mention individual people and even if they cause distress in those individuals."

I think that unless specific threats were made pretty specifically, and with a high degree of credibility (two factors cited by the ADL link), the disruptor would likely skate.

I also noted that many of the forms of redress are civil in nature, few of them are criminal. As I said, I think a civil suit is probably not that tough to make out.

But I'm skeptical that any prosecutor will take the case.


sitetest


524 posted on 05/09/2005 8:58:31 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I must be lucky Laz. I haven't seen this guy nor threads/posts (I don't think anyway). Color me lucky.

Nam Vet

525 posted on 05/09/2005 8:59:08 AM PDT by Nam Vet (MSM reporters think the MOIST dream they had the night before is a "reliable source".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul_fromatlanta
Portuguese is definately the offical language of Brazil (and the only official language - I just checked the CIA site).

Don't tell anyone, but the CIA gets their info from FreeRepublic. ;)

526 posted on 05/09/2005 8:59:15 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Holding out for a Slim-centric Universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
they speak portugese in Brazil

Spot on! You are correct, sir!

527 posted on 05/09/2005 8:59:17 AM PDT by theophilusscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: paul_fromatlanta; All

Whoever is the resident detective here please freepmail me, I may have some important info on what may be an undercover troll who visits and has posted from rotten.com and has trolled for young boys on the net.


528 posted on 05/09/2005 9:00:12 AM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Nam Vet
"I must be lucky Laz. I haven't seen this guy nor threads/posts (I don't think anyway). Color me lucky."

It's a first for me, too.

529 posted on 05/09/2005 9:00:19 AM PDT by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: tame
This is NOT to say there aren't certain legal, ethical. legit grounds to go after this clown. But i don't think "hate crimes" is the best way.

In general I don't like them either. I do think there's a place for prosecuting incitement to violence, which he approaches but probably doesn't cross yet, though that exists outside "hate crime" legislation, though with more difficulty.

My comment on the irony is rest's on the fact that it's not the incitement that disturbs most posters, rather disruption of the site, certainly a legitimate civil issue, and the posting of pornography in a racially charged format. Disgusting, but likely only prosecutable as a "hate crime".

530 posted on 05/09/2005 9:00:35 AM PDT by SJackson (The first duty of a leader is to make himself be loved without courting love, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

bttt!!!


531 posted on 05/09/2005 9:01:22 AM PDT by lutz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

You didn't ask me but I'll bump it for ya.

You sure he ain't just comming on to you?


532 posted on 05/09/2005 9:02:40 AM PDT by Rightly Biased (Salvation is not a prayer and an experience its a life changing event <><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
I did not see the pics but supposedly very sick stuff.
533 posted on 05/09/2005 9:03:03 AM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
But I'm skeptical that any prosecutor will take the case. sitetest

I'd say the probability approaches zero. There's nothing here, barring more specificity, kill SJackson rather than kill the Jews, which I doubt would even be enough, or direct action.

I won't even touch the liklihood of most prosecutors taking a difficult to prove case essentially in defense of the "vast right wing conspiracy".

534 posted on 05/09/2005 9:03:34 AM PDT by SJackson (The first duty of a leader is to make himself be loved without courting love, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru

Yes, for awhile. I remember him adding a couple people after that thread. I'd go back and look, but I don't think the recipients names are visible anymore.


535 posted on 05/09/2005 9:04:36 AM PDT by SJackson (The first duty of a leader is to make himself be loved without courting love, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Wow!
How awful...

I've never saw him, but I agree that someone needs to have a come to Jesus meeting with him.


536 posted on 05/09/2005 9:05:18 AM PDT by najida (Living in my house with just a power cord, a garden hose & a bucket; what else does a girl need ; ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

>>Whoever is the resident detective here please freepmail me, I may have some important info on what may be an undercover troll who visits and has posted from rotten.com and has trolled for young boys on the net.<<

That would be another possible solution - if you could trace him to something more prosecutble. Besides if he is trying to pick up little boys he needs to go to jail or worse anyway.

But I'm new here and not the right person to address that to.

Good luck.


537 posted on 05/09/2005 9:06:09 AM PDT by paul_fromatlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Makes me not want to check my pings anymore. :-(


538 posted on 05/09/2005 9:06:13 AM PDT by Bella_Bru (www.JewsforJudaism.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Jim Robinson
Perhaps some additional hurdle for members to gain permission to link pictures?
539 posted on 05/09/2005 9:07:48 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://c-pol.blogspot.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
Makes me not want to check my pings anymore. :-(

The idea is to cause you not to post on certain topics anymore, but not checking your pings works for him too.

540 posted on 05/09/2005 9:08:12 AM PDT by SJackson (The first duty of a leader is to make himself be loved without courting love, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,401-1,415 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson