Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to prosecute the Free Republic vandal outright. (Vanity)
today | By Lazamataz

Posted on 05/09/2005 5:54:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz

There is an internet vandal who defaces Free Republic with very gross pictures (homosexual sex and stuff from rotton.com) as well as posting "ALL YOU F***** N*****S & JEWS SHOULD BE LYNCHED".

He pings a variety of people to his post, ensuring that the trash is still in their My Posts lists.

To me, this isn't the milder form of harassment that Eschoir engaged in so many years ago. The very worst he would do is ask if you ever committed sodomy, and he once used the screen name "Paula Jones Tw*t". This is mild.

What this sick piece of work is doing is much more egregious. I believe it crosses the line into criminal defacement and restraint of trade. Are there any Free Republic lawyers (especially prosecutors) who can address this issue, and are there any private detectives with internet savvy that will help track the identity of this person down?


TOPICS: Free Republic; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: criminal; democratsarescum; dontbelieveit; eris; getahobby; gypsum; james54; lawyer; lawyers; lazisbored; lazlookingforwork; potmeetkettle; profanity; prosecution; prosecutors; troll; vandal; vandalism; waaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,401-1,415 next last
To: MadIvan
Most anti-hacking statutes should cover this - defacement of websites, as the "script kiddies" do is illegal.

Usually that's an unuathorized use, by cracking or stealing passwords. No such thing occured here. He jumped through the right hoops to become, if briefly, an authorized user. Our recourse is to delete his posts and remove his account, and ban his IP address.

101 posted on 05/09/2005 6:10:26 AM PDT by jude24 ("Stupid" isn't illegal - but it should be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: mhking

Since you and the others have been targeted, wouldn't that constitute as harrassment OR stalking????


102 posted on 05/09/2005 6:10:32 AM PDT by mommadooo3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush
Neither have I.

I guess Im not one of the FR elite either.

/pfffft

103 posted on 05/09/2005 6:10:37 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ex-Dem; Lazamataz

He's lurked long enough to know who's who. What a scum. Wish I was young again so... You know.


104 posted on 05/09/2005 6:10:45 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

thank you thank you
here all week ;)


105 posted on 05/09/2005 6:10:55 AM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Valin

Valin, TMP02 is a respected freeper who was trying to get the mods' attention since the offending post was not deleted quickly after hitting abuse.


106 posted on 05/09/2005 6:11:01 AM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

"Who's to say that this person has been banned before? He could be a FReeper in good standing, having been here for quite a while, and is now laughing. How hard is it to simply create another username? "

I suppose that's possible, too. I'd hate to think that any Freeper would stoop to such stuff, though.


107 posted on 05/09/2005 6:11:35 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile; Dog Gone

Lawyer advice needed ping!


108 posted on 05/09/2005 6:11:57 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I am at Dr. Venture's lab to right that which is wrong and to repair the torn curtain of time itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative
I suspect the cretin that posts this cr*p is probably reading this thread and getting his jollies.

I hope so, because I am 100% serious and I will not let go of this, until he's identified and prosecuted. I'm going to see if I can huddle with the moderators and formulate a plan of action. I'm pretty good with computers, you know.

Let's see him smirk when he's in court.

109 posted on 05/09/2005 6:12:16 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; John Robinson

Any chance of adding a feature so that when you check your "pings", you can delete specific ones without deleting the comment from the thread it exists on? It would almost be akin to a filter or block of some sort when you look at your own comments. Just an idea.


110 posted on 05/09/2005 6:12:37 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Free Republic just needs an /ignore feature so you whiners can just filter him out.


111 posted on 05/09/2005 6:12:41 AM PDT by xrp (Executing assigned posting duties flawlessly -- ZERO mistakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Incoming FReepmail


112 posted on 05/09/2005 6:12:55 AM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: mommadooo3
Since you and the others have been targeted, wouldn't that constitute as harrassment OR stalking????

I would think so. But once he's found, sending someone to break his kneecaps (and his computer) with a Louisville Slugger is probably cheaper than suing him into oblivion.

113 posted on 05/09/2005 6:13:03 AM PDT by mhking ("Today, we're gonna do things the RIGHT way...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I would delete his posts but not nuke him; not until his IP is tracked. Just my 2 cents.

So do this mean you support the nuclear option?

114 posted on 05/09/2005 6:13:15 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger
We're talking about criminal prosecutions, which is a government action.

He didn't "break in," he was an authorized user, so we can't get him for hacking.

It was political speech, so I don't think we can get him on obscenity.

JimRob has every right to kick him out - you're right. Freedom of speech guarantees no one a forum. But that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about a criminal prosecution. I see that as tricky.

115 posted on 05/09/2005 6:13:31 AM PDT by jude24 ("Stupid" isn't illegal - but it should be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Usually that's an unuathorized use, by cracking or stealing passwords.

This is authorized use?

Unless you are a lawyer, I will wait for their opinions. I especially want to hear from prosecutors.

116 posted on 05/09/2005 6:13:38 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

Nuculer.


117 posted on 05/09/2005 6:13:40 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Sadly, I do understand that is the point. I do enjoy FR too much to quit coming, but have we really gotten to the point where there is nothing that can be done to stop innocent people from being forced to view such stuff? Is this what freedom of speech is all about?

So are we finally helpless to keep this stuff out of our homes? Surely, this must be what Soddom & Gomorrah was like in it's last days.


118 posted on 05/09/2005 6:13:46 AM PDT by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: xrp

"Free Republic just needs an /ignore feature so you whiners can just filter him out."

Whiners? Did you see the posts in question? Nobody's whining here. We're really ticked off at this person, and for legitimate reasons.


119 posted on 05/09/2005 6:13:53 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I have it you all, since minors are allowed on this site couldn't he be charged with providing pornography to minors, just a thought.


120 posted on 05/09/2005 6:14:03 AM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,401-1,415 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson