Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: UK Election Results (Update - Early Exit Polls Show Tory Upset)
BBC ^ | May 5, 2005 | anonymous

Posted on 05/05/2005 7:59:15 AM PDT by tellw

The Vote is under way!


TOPICS: Breaking News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: blair; exitpolls; ukelection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,7601,761-1,7801,781-1,800 ... 2,421-2,425 next last
To: mabelkitty

"Joe Trippi was helping Blair's re-election (but I'm sure that everyone already knows that by now)."

... well, that's a reason for his setbacks right there!


1,761 posted on 05/05/2005 6:50:51 PM PDT by WOSG (Liberating Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1721 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
DUers having a meltdown

That alone makes my night. : )

1,762 posted on 05/05/2005 6:50:55 PM PDT by TheBigB (Can we shave some fuzz off these woofers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1721 | View Replies]

To: GiveEmDubya

-16 and counting. The second half of the races are more titled to the conservatives than the first half. I don't think it is going to get to the hung area, but I'm no longer as sure of that as I was earlier.


1,763 posted on 05/05/2005 6:51:42 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1757 | View Replies]

To: GiveEmDubya

That was me! LOL!


1,764 posted on 05/05/2005 6:51:43 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for Oklahoma Governor -- Run J.C. Run; Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1757 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

keys whooping him. War illegal. Kid blown away


1,765 posted on 05/05/2005 6:51:50 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1759 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

I've seen part of his shtick...really didn't care for it. ; )


1,766 posted on 05/05/2005 6:51:52 PM PDT by TheBigB (Can we shave some fuzz off these woofers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1695 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Who would the DUers be supporting?


1,767 posted on 05/05/2005 6:51:58 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1762 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

Blair is looking very subdued -- tells me that Labour is not doing well at all and makes my night.


1,768 posted on 05/05/2005 6:52:39 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for Oklahoma Governor -- Run J.C. Run; Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1759 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
To the right of Blair, her hat says LIAR.......


1,769 posted on 05/05/2005 6:52:41 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1758 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

Probably mostly the LibDems, maybe some Labour, definitely not Tory.


1,770 posted on 05/05/2005 6:52:46 PM PDT by TheBigB (Can we shave some fuzz off these woofers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1767 | View Replies]

To: DM1

Lib Dems are a combination of the old Liberal party (Lloyd George etc) and a Labour breakaway group from the 80s (IIRC).
Now they've swung left while Labour has moderated their socialist ways - moderated, not abandoned.


1,771 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:03 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1741 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

John Redwood (C), one of the leading eursceptics returned with increased majority.


1,772 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:13 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1762 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

Liberal dem.


Labor = commie

LDP= pinko commie


1,773 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:26 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1767 | View Replies]

To: Dales

Shrewsbury and Atcham was DEFINITELY because of the Lib Dems...Conservatives barely moved while the Labour/Lib Dem transfer was almost completely clean.


1,774 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:27 PM PDT by GiveEmDubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1763 | View Replies]

To: GiveEmDubya

I love these rosettes they wear to tell the party they are from.


1,775 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:30 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for Oklahoma Governor -- Run J.C. Run; Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1760 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Labour 246 (-16), Conservative 56 (+8), LibDems 29 (+6), Scottish National 6 (+2), Plaid Cymru 2 (-1), Independent 1 (+1) (340/646)


1,776 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:32 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1766 | View Replies]

To: DM1

"Lib Dem" has only existed since 1987, I think. The Liberals were a historically significant party that lost their place to Labour in the 1920s and survived as a tenuous fringe party carried on by a few bright intellectual lights and very few seats in Parliament. Rural, suburban, and Celtic, but rarely very liberal, and too elitist to be socialist.

In 1983, moderate left-wingers split off from Labour (then hardcore Socialist) to found a Social Democratic party on the European model. They joined forces with Labour in that election to present a moderate alternative to both Thatcher and Michael Foot. Well the leftist vote was split and with the Falklands effect Thatcher won huge despite a rough economy.

The Liberals and Social Democrats (again, small parties dominated by bright personalities) merged in time for the 1987 election and have been Lib Dem ever since. They used to campaign on constitutional issues, like proportional representation, but recently decided that a better niche would be to be far-left social democrats who raise taxes and improve public services and oppose war.

So they're winning lots of seats in the cities from Labour this time, however they are consequently losing their historic seats in the rural areas to Conservatives because the voters liked Liberals and Lib Dems well enough, and would never vote Labour, but have now woken up to the party's new direction and are reconsidering their options.


1,777 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:43 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1741 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83
Who would the DUers be supporting?

Great question.

1,778 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:50 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1767 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83
Who would the DUers be supporting?

saddam's puppet galloway.

1,779 posted on 05/05/2005 6:53:57 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1767 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Really?

I thought you'd enjoy it. The whole idea of a jewish boy taking the piss out of urban hoods appeals to me. Funny boy.


1,780 posted on 05/05/2005 6:54:13 PM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1766 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,7601,761-1,7801,781-1,800 ... 2,421-2,425 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson