Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pat Robertson:No Muslim judges
World Net Daily ^ | May 3, 2005 | World Net Daily

Posted on 05/03/2005 2:33:03 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie

Islamic leaders demand apology for 'hate-filled remarks'

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

Evangelist Pat Robertson is in trouble with U.S. Islamic organizations for saying Muslims should not serve in the president's Cabinet or as judges.

Pat Robertson

In an appearance on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" Sunday, Robertson, who ran for president in 1988, said if were elected he would not appoint Muslims to his Cabinet and that he was not in favor of Muslims serving as judges.

"They have said in the Quran there's a war against all the infidels," Robertson said. "Do you want somebody like that sitting as a judge? I wouldn't."

The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations yesterday called on "mainstream political and religious leaders" to repudiate the "hate-filled remarks."

"This type of hate-filled rhetoric deserves repudiation from all who respect America's long-standing tradition of pluralism," said Rabiah Ahmed, CAIR's communication coordinator.

Ahmed said many Muslims already serve with distinction in many levels of government, including judgeships at the state and local level.

Arsalan Iftikhar, CAIR's national legal director, said Robertson "has taken his far-right-wing rhetoric to absurd levels."

"He is trying to perpetuate this notion that Islam is a monolithic entity inherently at odds with modernity and democracy," Iftikhar said. "That is absolutely false. ... American Muslims have long been contributing members of American society.

Iftikhar added: "And I guarantee to Mr. Robertson that Muslims will one day become part of the federal bench -- whether or not he likes it."

Muslims were particularly outraged by a 2002 appearance on Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes" program in which Robertson said about Islam's prophet, Muhammad: "This man was an absolute wild-eyed fanatic. He was a robber and a brigand. And to say that these terrorists distort Islam, they're carrying out Islam. ... I mean, this man (Muhammad) was a killer. And to think that this is a peaceful religion is fraudulent."

Robertson also called Islam "a monumental scam" and claimed the Quran "is strictly a theft of Jewish theology."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: courts; judges; judiciary; muslim; patrobertson; sharialaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 421-422 next last
To: 26lemoncharlie

Just went too "askjeeves.com" searched for "Islamic humor", reply was.......Your search for islamic humor did not match with any Picture results.


81 posted on 05/03/2005 4:00:03 PM PDT by MississippyMuddy (No peace, without FREEDOM!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #82 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda

From askimam.com


I have heared people say that the Jihad in Chechnya an Palestine are land issues as they have started out as land Issues.2. Is it permissable for Chechens to attack Russia to make the people feel what they are going through ? 3. Please explain this ayat "wa qaatilul mushrikeena khaaffatan kama yuQatillunakum Kaaffa"

Answer 7104 2002-12-03

1. The two Jihaads are legitimate Jihaads.

2. The Mujahideen of Chechnya have proven that their aim is to establish Islam, not simply to acquire land. In Palestine, there are many groups. Those fighting to establish Islam are undertaking a correct Shar’ee Jihaad. Those who do not have Islam as their aim are Munafiqeen. Their harm to Islam is even greater than that of Israel.

3. The Aayaat means that when the Kuffaar are hostile to you than fight them completely, just as they fight your completely. You should not hold back anything and put all your resources behind the Jihaad.

and Allah Ta'ala Knows Best

Moulana Imraan Vawda
FATWA DEPT.


83 posted on 05/03/2005 4:02:21 PM PDT by MississippyMuddy (No peace, without FREEDOM!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

Knowledge is power :)

Jeff


84 posted on 05/03/2005 4:03:42 PM PDT by MississippyMuddy (No peace, without FREEDOM!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: dannyboy72
Our Constitution is consistent with the Bible. Any person that thinks there is a conflict either doesn't understand the Bible or the Constitution, or both. The Bible is the basis for the Constitution and the Bible is always the final authority. The Constitution is just an application of Biblical values.
85 posted on 05/03/2005 4:04:05 PM PDT by usa1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
American Muslims have long been contributing members of American society.

What and when was the first positive significant contribution made to American society by an American Muslim? What and when was the latest?

86 posted on 05/03/2005 4:07:28 PM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Re-elect Dino Rossi in 2005!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
And another thing I'm tired of hearing is people whining about "hate". This is a free society and people can "hate" if they want. Of course, Pat's comments are not hate, they are standing up for American values. However, these muslims show (along with many Americans) how little they understand about liberty when they want to enforce on another what that person can like or hate. Pat doesn't need to apologize for exercising his right to free speech. As an American, I'm offended that somebody would expect him or anyone else to.
87 posted on 05/03/2005 4:10:34 PM PDT by usa1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Way to go, Pat! Thanks for underlining Christian outrage about Democratic religious tests for public office with a completely unnecessary comment. I don't think one should have a religious test outlawing Moslems per se. If they advocate beliefs that harm the written Constitution, then they should be excluded, but they should not be presumed to do so. I think Pat does our side more harm than good, and frankly is dumber than a pile of bricks. We need smart, effective advocates to go up against the liberal and MSM slicksters.


88 posted on 05/03/2005 4:13:15 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

,,, appoint Christians to equivalent positions in Saudi Arabia and see how popular that thought is.


89 posted on 05/03/2005 4:15:21 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Nothing would piss me off more than if Bush nominated a Muslim for any governmental office.


90 posted on 05/03/2005 4:15:23 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Recall Barbara Boxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
"He (Robertson) is trying to perpetuate this notion that Islam is a monolithic entity inherently at odds with modernity and democracy," Iftikhar said.

Whaaaa?

Ya mean it ain't?

91 posted on 05/03/2005 4:15:33 PM PDT by OldSmaj (Jihad this, Islam! Your religion is false and your god is non-existent! Come get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #92 Removed by Moderator

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: 26lemoncharlie

If they are fighting back like this it means you scored a direct hit.

Pat don't back down man call it like it is.


95 posted on 05/03/2005 4:28:40 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatguy
"What is a moderate Muslim?"

Like the Italian lady said: "the difference between a moderate Muslim and an extremest Muslim is the length of their beards."
96 posted on 05/03/2005 4:40:55 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

I don't want to live amongst people who might wake up one morning and decide that is the day they want to go to paradise and collect their 72 virgins and 28 boys.


97 posted on 05/03/2005 4:45:43 PM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: jrestrepo
"What Mohammad Atta would not have made a good supreme court justice"

To suggest that all Muslims are Atta's is a blatantly ignorant statement. Its some what akin to saying all Christians are Crusaders or Jim Jones. And if you want to select a few verses of the Koran to prove the violent nature of their religion, why don't we just post a few verses from the book of Joshua to prove the violence of Christianity? My point is simply this, religions are composed of men, it is the character and integrity of the MAN being selected for the judicial spot that should be reviewed, not his religious affiliation.
98 posted on 05/03/2005 4:48:45 PM PDT by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MississippyMuddy
Unless Omar M. Ahmad was running for a judicial spot, then what he says is irrelevant to the selection of another judicial candidate, even if they follow the same religion. You cannot condemn an entire group of people based on the antics of a few, it is unconstitutional for a reason. Because it is based on irrational fear and blind prejudice.
99 posted on 05/03/2005 4:52:35 PM PDT by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: liberty2004
"Islam is NOT a religion but at it's core a violent political movement that seeks to totally submit the individual to the collective."

No it isn't, thats fundamentalist Islam. I know many peaceful Muslims who want nothing more than to worship their god, raise their kids, and live peaceful prosperous lives.

Also the fact that they worship a deity qualifies them as a religion because religion is defined as "Belief in and reverence for a supernatural power or powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe"
100 posted on 05/03/2005 4:56:05 PM PDT by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 421-422 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson