Skip to comments.
Runaway bride should be charged
CFP ^
| May 3, 2005
| Arthur Weinreb
Posted on 05/03/2005 9:35:59 AM PDT by MikeEdwards
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: MikeEdwards
She has endangered the life of people who are truly kidnapped. People will hesitate to go search, fearing another hoax, meanwhile the victim will be killed and the kidnapper will get away.
As far as I can tell, the only law she broke was in the phone call falsely reporting that she had been kidnapped. Leaving the state without telling anyone what she was doing was not a crime, but a moral outrage. She should be charged with filing a false report, and then hauled in front of the judge and placed on probation.
2
posted on
05/03/2005 9:40:23 AM PDT
by
Defiant
(Amend the Constitution to nullify all decisions not founded on original intent.)
To: MikeEdwards
hmmm. I don't think she should be charged for the X amount of days before she called in 911 and filed a false report. From then on i say it's fair game.
If we just implanted that GPS tracking device into everyone at birth, this wouldn't be a problem.
3
posted on
05/03/2005 9:40:28 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: MikeEdwards
I just heard she has pulled similar "stunts" on 2 other occasions. She is a rich bit** head case.
4
posted on
05/03/2005 9:41:55 AM PDT
by
lawdude
(Liberalism is a mental disease.)
To: Defiant
"She has endangered the life of people who are truly kidnapped. People will hesitate to go search, fearing another hoax, meanwhile the victim will be killed and the kidnapper will get away"
HIGHLY doubtful. I'd say off into the realm of not going to happen. Now if she herself actually gets kidnapped, then your statement might have some merit. If people doubted every false report we would have stopped chasing crime a 1000 years ago
5
posted on
05/03/2005 9:42:24 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: tfecw
" If we just implanted that GPS tracking device into everyone at birth, this wouldn't be a problem."
Don't ever run for political office!
6
posted on
05/03/2005 9:42:56 AM PDT
by
lawdude
(Liberalism is a mental disease.)
To: lawdude
Naw i could probably win with the soccer mom's and crazy libs. The Tracking devices are for the children, don't you see!
7
posted on
05/03/2005 9:43:56 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: MikeEdwards
Her fiance should thank his lucky stars she left. Saved him just in the nick of time, I'd say.
To: tfecw
If we just implanted that GPS tracking device into everyone at birth, this wouldn't be a problem.
Yeah, that would have helped police find the Hispanic man and white woman in their 40s who kidnapped her.
To: Defiant
Basically she should have her butt kicked. She indeed did damage to the system. She also did not think for one minute about the individuals whom she was harming with this little exercise in stupidity. The man was suspected to have caused her harm and had to deal with that, along with knowing that he did nothing wrong and wondering what happened to her.
This equates to these people who do dangerous activities, in the outback, mountains, etc, getting stranded, causing thousands of dollars and man power hours to be expended in their rescues when they get into trouble. They should have to pay that back. And, she should have to pay for it also. False reports, and the expended monies in trying to determine what happened to her because of her false report and little disappearing act.
10
posted on
05/03/2005 9:45:20 AM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(IF YOU HATE DEMOCRATS - CLAP YOUR HANDS!!! clap clap clap)
To: Old Grumpy
Saved him just in the nick of time Not really, he wants her back.
11
posted on
05/03/2005 9:45:53 AM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: RetiredArmy
Hmm once she filed the report i agree, but just for running away i disagree.
What if my mother would call the cops every time I didn't call home for more then 3 days? Should I pay for that for "disappearing"? granted I'm taking this to the extreme a little. A better one would be if I decided to run off and not tell my roommate. Am i liable when I don't give him a call and he ends up calling the cops after I'm MIA for 2 weeks?
12
posted on
05/03/2005 9:49:04 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: Defiant
Isn't there a pro-Mexican group that could possibly charge her with a civil crime or whatever? Didn't she sort of commit a hate crime, or something?
13
posted on
05/03/2005 9:49:06 AM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: Defiant
That's what makes me upset and angry - whenever people like this do selfish "crying wolf" things, it always, always makes it worse for the legitimate victims. Her dad was on the the Today Show this morning saying that people in Duluth don't want her charged and that only people outside think so. I wonder. Just because his friends and family are supportive doesn't mean others feel similarly.
She's 32 years old for crying out loud! If she was 19 I could see it. I figure if you're this unstable at 32 (not sure if you want to marry or not), then it "aint never gonna happen."
To: MikeEdwards
If she is convicted, hopefully she will be required to make restitution for the thousands of dollars that was spent investigating her disappearance. With all the royalties coming in from books and made-for-TV movies, that shouldnt be much of a problem. One thing she will won't be able to repay is the emotional toll she must've placed on her family and friends.
Especially after cases like the [Laci] Peterson's and [Lori] Hacking's, to hear that a female has "gone missing" has to place a heavy weight on those close to her. One one hand, I'm sure their first feeling was, "thank God she's safe." But a close second must also be, "what the hell was she thinking, causing so much grief to closest to her?"
15
posted on
05/03/2005 9:49:35 AM PDT
by
Lou L
To: MikeEdwards
Running away isn't a crime, but she went further and told them a false story. THAT'S a crime.
To: tfecw
I totally agree. It was almost a full week before she made a call (someone please correct me if I am wrong), and by then Rita Cosby and FNC had done wall to wall coverage with it. Its a free country.
17
posted on
05/03/2005 9:54:46 AM PDT
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: MikeEdwards
Oh, no. This poor, innocent girl should not be charged. She should be celebrated for raising America's awareness of Pre-Bridal Anxiety Disorder. After therapy I hope she will lead the campaign to identify and treat this terrible and often misunderstood malady.-American Society of Psychobabbology
To: softwarecreator
"Not really, he wants her back."
He must be a glutton for punishment.
To: MikeEdwards
Treat her just like Tawana Brawley.
20
posted on
05/03/2005 10:00:32 AM PDT
by
George Smiley
(This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson