Posted on 04/28/2005 10:13:37 AM PDT by Columbus Dawg
MASON, Ohio -- A lesbian couple says a community recreation center's refusal to sell them a family pass because they aren't married is discriminatory.
Heather Scott, 33, and Carrie Scott, 40, applied for the family pass for themselves and Heather Scott's three children who live with them and were told they don't meet the city's definition of a married couple.
"We're no different than anyone else," said Carrie Scott, Heather's partner and the children's stepmother since the women's civil union ceremony in Vermont in 2002. "Our family is the same as the one across the street. It's a little different makeup, but we deserve the same as everyone else."
City Law Director Ken Schneider said the taxpayer-financed Mason Community Center's policy is not discriminatory.
The center offers family memberships to married couples or single adults and any children residing in the same household and claimed on their most recent federal income tax return.
Mason officials say the policy, in place since the center opened in 2003, isn't intended to ban same-sex partners. They say they just wanted to find a definition of family and decided the federal standard was the best.
"We were just trying to put our arms around it," said Michael Hecker, director of the parks and recreation department in this city 20 miles northeast of Cincinnati. "We just didn't want to be taken advantage of by 10 people who don't live together."
Mason officials say the Scotts can still be members of the center, but they must get an individual membership for Carrie. Annual family passes cost $525 a year for residents. A separate membership for Carrie would cost an extra $335.
I can't wait till some necro shows up with his stiff wanting the same pass ....
I wish science would hurry up and figure out if homosexuality is a choice or not. I can't make a decision until then.
It's a little different makeup
Please make up your mind.
If this was an audio clip, Laura Ingraham would have the Lie of The Day right here!
Oh, I beg to differ hon.
"We're no different than anyone else," said Carrie Scott, Heather's partner and the children's stepmother since the women's civil union ceremony in Vermont in 2002."
No - you are very different. You are sexually perverted and should not be allowed to parent children. And you certainly should not be rewarded for your perversion by receiving "family" benefits.
Correct, you're not and as such like anybody else if you marry a member of the opposite sex you win the family pass lotto. Until then, no special rights for you.
Sorry, but you are.
http://www.therightoutlook.com/blogs/levi/2005/01/22/homosexual_behavior
Read this, i found it insightfull.
There are also more homosexual arguments on this guy's site as well.
The center offers family memberships to married couples or single adults and any children residing in the same household and claimed on their most recent federal income tax return.
Ummmm.... It seems that the community recreation center won't sell them a family pass because they are not a family.
"refusal to sell them a family pass"
They should just show them their "licker license"
If I show up with my 35 wives, can I get the discount?
Not quite Carrie!!!!
The point I like best is about how if homosexuality is genetic, then identical twins with identical dna would always be either both straight or both gay. Since they aren't, it isn't hardwired into the genes. Makes sense to me.
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Boo Hoo. So sad, two psychologically imbalanced sexual deviants posing as a "family" suffer a defeat. May this be the harbinger of the future.
Back in the Closet!
Let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
Vermont must be a pathetic place to live. It was once known for it's precision machine tool and firearms industries. Now its known only for its lesbian couples and liberals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.