1 posted on
04/28/2005 7:35:13 AM PDT by
MikeJ75
To: MikeJ75
Sex with animals can be banned? Don't see how based on the recent Supreme Court sodomy case.
2 posted on
04/28/2005 7:37:16 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: MikeJ75
It is time someone put a stop to these people, lickety split.
3 posted on
04/28/2005 7:39:45 AM PDT by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: MikeJ75
But Murphy left intact parts of the crimes against nature law forbidding human sex with animals, solicitation for oral and anal sex, and aggravated crimes against nature aggravated usually meaning nonconsensual sex or sex involving someone who is underaged.
LEGAL didn't object to having those activities declared illegal...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
They just didn't like the legal procedures used and it has nothing to do with an agenda to strike down any law dealing with sexual perversions.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
4 posted on
04/28/2005 7:41:42 AM PDT by
FormerLib
(Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
To: MikeJ75
the Louisiana 5th Circuit Court of Appeal rejected an attempt by LEGAL, the Louisiana Electorate of Gays and Lesbians, to throw out a law that says the state attorney general can investigate homosexual organizations.What are they being investigated for?
6 posted on
04/28/2005 7:44:36 AM PDT by
Protagoras
(Evolution is amazing... I wonder who invented it?)
To: MikeJ75
The categories are all lumped together in the elderly statute. yea, uh huh, "old laws need changed to suit me" (whiiiiiiiine)
7 posted on
04/28/2005 7:45:22 AM PDT by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: MikeJ75
John Rawls, LEGAL's attorney, vowed to press on. "It's like swimming in jello. This is the 14th appelate court we've gone to," he said. "If the judges of this state think they are going to wear out the gay and lesbian community, the judges are mistaken." Shakespeare was ~93% right.
8 posted on
04/28/2005 7:45:52 AM PDT by
tomkat
To: MikeJ75
AH HA! the truth is burried in the end of the article. (no pun intended)
The goal of the homosexuals was to eliminate the statute so it would be legal to have sex acts with non-adults. As usual homosexuals want sexual access to children.
To: MikeJ75
"John Rawls, LEGAL's attorney, vowed to press on. "It's like swimming in jello. This is the 14th appelate court we've gone to," he said. "If the judges of this state think they are going to wear out the gay and lesbian community, the judges are mistaken."
And if the homosexuals think they are going to wear out the normal heterosexuals in America with this kind of s**t, I believe they are in for a fight. Bring it on!
13 posted on
04/28/2005 8:28:15 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Hey Hey Hey! It's looking better every day! Normal Americasn want to have their say!
Yup, crimes against nature are just no good. Back in the closet, please.
Let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.
Note: If sexual deviants of various stripes kept their unsavory proclivities to themselves, in the outhouse where they belong, no one would know, and therefore no one would care.
What we object to is having sexual deviance shoved down our throats, our kids' throats, our grandparents' throats, and our grandchildrens' throats. Leave us be, and we'll leave you be. Got it?
20 posted on
04/28/2005 10:57:12 AM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson