Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bolton Finds U.N. Nomination in Jeopardy
myway.com ^ | 4/25/05 | ANNE GEARAN

Posted on 04/24/2005 3:21:15 AM PDT by Imaverygooddriver

Bolton Finds U.N. Nomination in Jeopardy

By ANNE GEARAN

WASHINGTON (AP) - Withdraw or be pushed out by the White House. Survive the test of his professional life. Suffer a rejection by the Senate. That's about what it comes down to for John R. Bolton, President Bush's besieged nominee to be U.N. ambassador.

Bolton could weather the indignity of further investigation into his personal and professional behavior and win confirmation by the Senate next month. He also could find his nomination scuttled. Or he could pull the plug before a scheduled May 12 vote by a Senate committee.

Only a week ago, Bolton seemed assured of moving on to New York to be the ambassador who works toward Bush's wishes for major changes at the United Nations. His new assignment, however, was thrown into jeopardy last week when moderate Republican senators said new allegations about Bolton gave them cause to reconsider whether he was the right person for the job.

"This nomination is not doomed, but it's on life support and the plug may well be pulled any day," said Allan J. Lichtman, a political history professor at American University.

GOP support for Bolton cracked during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing early last week, so the chairman decided to postpone a vote that Bolton would have lost.

Since then, the White House has defended Bolton daily and blamed Democrats for playing politics with the nomination. Yet each new day has brought fresh allegations that Bolton dressed down subordinates or behaved, as one former colleague claimed, "like a madman," when he was crossed.

The charges come on top of unease over Bolton's past hostility toward the United Nations and allegations that the political appointee tried to pressure career intelligence analysts into twisting the facts for political reasons.

Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., went to the full Senate on Thursday to decry what he called "death by a thousand cuts."

Later that day, word spread that former Secretary of State Colin Powell quietly was telling wavering Republican senators what he knows about Bolton, undersecretary of state for arms control and international security since May 2001. The two did not get along during Bush's first term.

"My sense is that he's going down," said Thomas Mann, an expert on Congress and the presidency at the Brookings Institution in Washington. It is not clear, Mann said, whether Bolton would jump or be pushed by the White House.

Vice President Dick Cheney sounded as resolute as ever about Bolton's nomination when he spoke to Republican campaign lawyers on Friday.

"If being occasionally tough and aggressive and abrasive were a problem," Cheney said, "a lot of members of the United States Senate wouldn't qualify."

Bolton has not commented publicly since he testified before the committee on April 11. Until the committee hearing on Tuesday, he appeared headed to a 10-8 party line approval, which would have sent the nomination to the GOP-controlled Senate.

Now the focus is on one committee member, Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio. Voinovich stunned the chairman, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and his colleagues when he announced during the hearing that he had misgivings about Bolton.

The White House is now lobbying Voinovich and two other GOP senators on the committee to support Bolton, although Bush has not gotten involved personally.

To salvage the nomination, the White House probably will have to offer some "exculpatory information" to counter the daily trickle of new allegations about Bolton's record, Lichtman said. In the end, however, he said it may depend on how badly the White House wants Bolton's confirmation.

"If the White House wants to spend enough political chips they could save it," Lichtman said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bolton; unnations; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last


1 posted on 04/24/2005 3:21:18 AM PDT by Imaverygooddriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Imaverygooddriver
Vice President Dick Cheney sounded as resolute as ever about Bolton's
nomination when he spoke to Republican campaign lawyers on Friday.

Good for him!

The White House is now lobbying Voinovich and two other GOP senators
on the committee to support Bolton, although
Bush has not gotten involved personally.

WHY NOT?!!!
Sometimes Bush makes me sick to my stomach!

2 posted on 04/24/2005 3:33:36 AM PDT by trickyricky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imaverygooddriver

If Bolton is as tough as they portray him, he will get nominated.

Is anyone else as sick as I am of all these endless manhood insults of honorable politicians?

Winning in politics is not about getting your way on the small issues, it's about the big picture.


3 posted on 04/24/2005 3:56:25 AM PDT by tkathy (Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imaverygooddriver
"If the White House wants to spend enough political chips they could save it," Lichtman said.

Precisely. Despite the VP's stated sentence of support, I haven't seen the WH leading any charge of the light brigade to Bolton's defense. They've been pretty meek, if you ask me.

A comment of support here, and another one there.

I think it really is their style to float people and see if anything turns up. Ashcroft, Chavez, Kerik.... examples. I don't mind the style, but it's hard to get worked up over that which hasn't yet gotten the WH in a lather.

4 posted on 04/24/2005 4:00:53 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trickyricky
" ... Sometimes Bush makes me sick to my stomach!"

Quite understandable.


I would feel ill also if I took everything witten, or stated about him to be factual and true, however I was fortunate that at an early time in my life I was advised to ... "consider the sources".

5 posted on 04/24/2005 4:04:55 AM PDT by G.Mason ( Because Free Republic obviously needed another opinionated big mouth ... NRA member since 1964)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins; All
What is the point of voting Republicans into office if they are going to role over and let the Democrats run the show?

Everybody should be writing or calling the RNC and telling them that you will not donate another dime to the party until the take a strong stand on:

Judges
Bolton
Tom Delay

Not a d-i-m-e!
6 posted on 04/24/2005 4:10:28 AM PDT by filly (Better to have tried and failed than to have lived your entire life as a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Imaverygooddriver

Colin Powell needs to STFU and haul his liberal carcass back home. Apparently, President Bush did not boot him hard enough, since he has found his way back to Washington and is now backstabbing Bolton.


7 posted on 04/24/2005 4:19:10 AM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: filly

I'm not sure why the WH pursues a "float and see" position on nominees, but it does. Maybe they just don't have enough folks to investigate their own nominees. I don't know.

Maybe you can investigate criminal stuff, but you can't the personal or political stuff.

Whatever it is, it makes it hard to get in a tizzy about WH nominees.

All except the judiciary....the WH seems to have launched a real offensive to get judges approved. We'll see what Frist and the Senate does with that.


8 posted on 04/24/2005 4:19:20 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins
IMHO, Bolton is a proxy for the judicial nominations. If the GOP doesn't pull together, if the WH doesn't fight aggressively for Bolton, and if there are no consequences for those who desert the GOP while the dems show 100% unity, they are telegraphing weakness to Republicans who are thinking about joining the Democrats to defeat the "nuclear" option.
9 posted on 04/24/2005 4:29:00 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Voinovich is the problem, not Bolton. Voinovich puts politics above party and country. He admitted he was not up to speed on Bolton, he had not gone to the meetings.

Voinovich was a tax and spend Governor in Ohio, not necessarily smart or loyal.

The Nation, not just Ohio has to hold Voinovich responsible for future carnage caused by the UN if Bolton does not get in.

Little George is counting on Republican support and Democratic appreciation and support while he plays both sides of the fence. He was just reelected for six more years. Probably too old and dumb to run again. Challengers for his seat should begin to speak out. They can start by calling for his resignation.
10 posted on 04/24/2005 4:55:45 AM PDT by paguch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
IMHO, Bolton is a proxy for the judicial nominations.

I agree completely. And not only that, but an acid test of whether the buerocracy will be able to sink someone who challenges it. If Bolton is lost over such petty charges, who will be ready to be a hard charger within the system anymore? Nobody with future ambitions.

The idea that the Dems are concerned about his demeanor is such a joke. This is the party that almost nominated Howlin Howdy Dean. I hope that Republicans everwhere will lean hard, push hard, and take this one to the mat. The principles and precedent it sets will be far more important than the position involved.
11 posted on 04/24/2005 4:57:11 AM PDT by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Imaverygooddriver

I can't imagine why Bolton wanted it in the first place. Withdraw his nomination and then leave the position empty. That will send a stronger message of how the administration feels towards the UN than Bolton could.


12 posted on 04/24/2005 4:59:23 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imaverygooddriver

Maybe as a result there'll be a new military airbase in Cleveland now.


13 posted on 04/24/2005 5:00:31 AM PDT by hubbubhubbub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imaverygooddriver

Bolton understands the corruption and mendacity of the UN, and he would announce it loudly.

The Marxist rats who support the UN socialists can't allow that. Being told the truth about the UN would increase the number of Americans calling for the UN's overdue demise. The UN with its criminal, fascist NGOs is one of the power bases for the rat party. The corrupt leftists will fight hard to continue the UN's theft, murder and lies.


14 posted on 04/24/2005 5:32:41 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trickyricky

I have to agree, most of the time his conservative values are at the surface, but when it comes to UN, border control, etc. I too sometimes retch.


15 posted on 04/24/2005 5:56:42 AM PDT by Probus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Good idea, da**ed good idea!


16 posted on 04/24/2005 5:58:27 AM PDT by Probus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Imaverygooddriver

Remember to give to the NRSC this next election cycle. END HEAVY SARCASM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


17 posted on 04/24/2005 6:22:45 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

There's precedent for a major power not having representation at a major Security Council meeting. The Soviets were boycotting the meeting the day the vote was taken to support South Korea following invasion by the North.

Not filling our seat at the UN is an altogether bad idea, although I agree with the sentiment behind the gesture.


18 posted on 04/24/2005 6:37:04 AM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
"IMHO, Bolton is a proxy for the judicial nominations."

I believe you are right. The Democrats are just using this Bolton confirmation to size up their Republican opponents in the Senate in preparation for the upcoming judicial nominee confirmations, and I’m afraid they have just found out that our Republican majority has no backbone.

19 posted on 04/24/2005 6:41:47 AM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Winning in politics is not about getting your way on the small issues, it's about the big picture.

The Bolton nomination is part of a bigger picture. If Bush cannot have a GOP Senate confirm his nominee to the UN, which has always been recognized as a place where the Executive has the most control, then Bush is a lame duck. Bush will be a toothless tiger that no one will fear, and we might as well just focus on 2008.

20 posted on 04/24/2005 10:05:38 AM PDT by Evolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson