Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Imaverygooddriver

I can't imagine why Bolton wanted it in the first place. Withdraw his nomination and then leave the position empty. That will send a stronger message of how the administration feels towards the UN than Bolton could.


12 posted on 04/24/2005 4:59:23 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Good idea, da**ed good idea!


16 posted on 04/24/2005 5:58:27 AM PDT by Probus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

There's precedent for a major power not having representation at a major Security Council meeting. The Soviets were boycotting the meeting the day the vote was taken to support South Korea following invasion by the North.

Not filling our seat at the UN is an altogether bad idea, although I agree with the sentiment behind the gesture.


18 posted on 04/24/2005 6:37:04 AM PDT by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson