Having a vested interest in finding a solution can also make you more likely to jump to conclusions.
Where did I say I only recognized the pharms and AMA as reputable? I only accept peer reviewed and willing to give the full set of data rather than just the conclussions as reputable, don't care where it comes from I want to see how open they are with the data. the fact that you're jumping to conclussions tells me everything I know about your willingness to analyze the data on its own merits.
Where did I say all of nothing? Once again you're jumping to conclussions and inserting positions I haven't taken. We won't be covered by herd immunity if too many people stop getting the vaccines, herd immunity is only as good as the immunity of the herd. No reputable study has found anything wrong with the vaccines, there's nothing to fix.
True, that is a danger. Not having a vested interest is likely to cause you not to form any conclusions at all, or go looking for any to start with.
I only accept peer reviewed and willing to give the full set of data rather than just the conclussions as reputable, don't care where it comes from I want to see how open they are with the data. the fact that you're jumping to conclussions tells me everything I know about your willingness to analyze the data on its own merits.
And you've done this? Why would you? You have no interest in the subject, one way or the other.
Data doesn't have merits. Data relating to other data has merits. I've seen nothing from the "reputable" studies on either side that leads me to a conclusion. On the other hand, I've seen plenty of anecdotal evidence that points to a problem with vaccines that needs to be looked at.
The "earth is flat, dammit" society that you seem to be a member of refuses to partake in any study that isn't designed to clear itself.
No reputable study has found anything wrong with the vaccines, there's nothing to fix.
Well, there you go. Sleep soundly tonight then.