Post 336 is an article and the last sentence addresses the issue of the ME's power to have the DCF reports even if they are sealed by the Judge.
I posted the link but somehow it didn't come as a link, my html is very primitive!
"Post 336 is an article and the last sentence addresses the issue of the ME's power to have the DCF reports even if they are sealed by the Judge."
Found it! Thanks.
I think there's a bit of confusion about just what it is they're referring to though.
The Schindlers' in an attempt to postpone the feeding tube removal etc. filed a motion (in early March of this year)to have the DFC intervene based on abuse. (The abuse being the care she was receiving...there was also some thought to Bush ordering the DFC to intervene.) This is summed up in Greer's response here
Judge Greer denies Department of Children and Families request to intervene
He makes note that the DFC made previous inquiries and DFC DID NOT find the alleged abuses in previous investigations.
The sense among those discussing the sealed records is that there is previous allegations of Michael abusing her, such as wife battering?, that the DFC investigated these charges and the judge sealed these types of records.
From my reading, this latter thought doesn't appear to be the case? I'll stand corrected if someone has other info.