Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky

The biggest problem was that Gibbs (the Schindlers' attorney) refused to file this as a de novo case.

In short, he f***ed up his one opportunity to undo his previous f***-ups.


41 posted on 03/31/2005 3:26:23 PM PST by Poohbah (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
The biggest problem was that Gibbs (the Schindlers' attorney) refused to file this as a de novo case.

Dear Lord, friend, you are so right. I was listening to Hannity's show on the drive home tonight....the legal proceedings in this case border on the criminal.

I wish I could understand why Gibbs didn't throw himself on the de novo right handed to him by Congress and the President.

I'll just never understand it.

53 posted on 03/31/2005 3:31:28 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah

David Gibbs, the Schindler's lawyer, only filed for a temporary restraining order, not for a de novo hearing. What the congresscritters appear to be angry about is that the judge failed to give the Schindlers something they didn't ask for in the first place. It's posturing.


55 posted on 03/31/2005 3:31:47 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
"The biggest problem was that Gibbs (the Schindlers' attorney) refused to file this as a de novo case."

I don't understand all the legalize, but why would he have had to do this? Didn't the congress file it with the courts asking to do a de novo?

73 posted on 03/31/2005 3:41:52 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson