Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
"The biggest problem was that Gibbs (the Schindlers' attorney) refused to file this as a de novo case."

I don't understand all the legalize, but why would he have had to do this? Didn't the congress file it with the courts asking to do a de novo?

73 posted on 03/31/2005 3:41:52 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Spunky
I don't understand all the legalize, but why would he have had to do this?

Because the courts aren't supposed to reach beyond the evidence presented to them. The burden, once that law was passed, was squarely on Gibbs. We get snarky when Justice Kennedy starts citing foreign law. In this case, the courts stayed within the boundaries of the law, and now we're PO'd at them because they didn't take an activist posture.

Didn't the congress file it with the courts asking to do a de novo?

Congress filed no case. They merely passed a law.

88 posted on 03/31/2005 3:54:32 PM PST by Poohbah (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson