Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Schiavo Files Request With the SCOTUS, USSC Refuses to Take Schiavo Case

Posted on 03/24/2005 7:22:09 AM PST by ConservativeMan55

Edited on 03/24/2005 7:43:21 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Mod note: Calls for violence will result in suspensions

Michael Schiavo has filed a petition with the Supreme Court asking them to stay out of the case.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arepblcifyoucnkeepit; arrestmichael; arrestmike4insulin; arrestmikenow; babylonfallen; blackrobedtyrants; changingrules; deathlegionsrejoice; dredscott; federalism; grandstanding; heb1225; inasmuchas; judgmentcoming; judicialtyranny; loser; michaelschiavoisevil; murderbyjudge; nationcursed; refusedtoheargod; refusedtohearhim; righttolife; schiavo; scotus; terri; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 1,161-1,176 next last
To: Rutles4Ever

It is just another part of this puzzle that makes no sense to a lot of us.


701 posted on 03/24/2005 9:09:56 AM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Increase Republicans in Congress in 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
"But, the satute was changed in the interim that Terri was incapacitiated. That is, at the time she became incapacitated, food and water via a g-tube was not considered artifical life support."

Yep.

702 posted on 03/24/2005 9:10:08 AM PST by Miss Behave (Man who fart in church sit in own pew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 695 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

No I'm not.

Starving her is not humane but starving her/feeding her/starving her/feeding her based on different rulings and opinions is 10000 times worse.

Nobody here at FR knows what that woman wants. Everything written in favor of keeping her alive is based on what we BELIEVE she wants.

And my personal opinion (and that's all it is, my opinion) is that I think we should let her go. I believe in Heaven and I know that she is better off there. If you disagree, that is your opinion.

That doesn't make either of us right or wrong.


703 posted on 03/24/2005 9:10:20 AM PST by gruffwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

That carries no weight in this case.

Look, it's a tragedy, but what's at the core of it are some bad laws, laws that the Florida legislature refused to undo yesterday...not bad judiciary.

Jeb and the legislature are busily trying to save face by laying the blame on the Courts.


704 posted on 03/24/2005 9:10:38 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; MineralMan
Your statement is not true, the decision to remove or continue life support, in absence of explicit documentation from the patient, falls on the next of kin.

I asked MineralMan (godless atheist) for a cite for that proposition, and he hasn't coughed one up yet. Maybe you are able to.

705 posted on 03/24/2005 9:10:41 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion

More info.

2/25/1990 Terri's Injury


2/25/1990 X-Ray Report Dr. Hameroff
Images taken of cervical spine, no acute bony pathology - straightening of normal cervical lordosis

2/25/1990 Neuro Consult Dr. DeSousa
Deeply comatose. No evidence of acute process in CT scan. Evidence of myoclonic seizures. Rule out acute myocardiac infarction, seizures as cause. Neck is somewhat stiff as is all of the muscles of the body. No jugular venous distension. WBC 26,300, drug screen negative

2/25/1990 CT Scan Report Dr. Hameroff
Normal

2/26/1990 EEG Report Dr. DeSousa
Abnormal EEG indicative of generalized suppression and slowing

2/27/1990 DeSousa Report
Brainstem Auditory Evoked Response shows no significant disruption of the brain stem acoustic pathway - study within normal limits

2/27/1990 CT Scan Report Dr. Greenberg
Normal CT Scan

2/28/1990 EEG Report Dr. DeSousa
Generalized diffuse slowing. Some fast frequency rhythms which were not obvious during previous recording. May have been slight improvement over last EEG.

3/19/1990 EEG Report Dr. DeSousa
Markedly abnormal EEG, no significant improvement from previous records

3/30/1990 CT Scan Report Dr. Abramson
CT Scan shows noncommunicating hydrocephalus, changes occurred since 2/27 exam


706 posted on 03/24/2005 9:10:48 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

President's State of the Union 2005 Address (excerpt):
"Because a society is measured by how it treats the weak and vulnerable, we must strive to build a culture of life. Medical research can help us reach that goal, by developing treatments and cures that save lives and help people overcome disabilities -- and I thank the Congress for doubling the funding of the National Institutes of Health. (Applause.) To build a culture of life, we must also ensure that scientific advances always serve human dignity, not take advantage of some lives for the benefit of others. We should all be able to agree -- (applause) -- we should all be able to agree on some clear standards. I will work with Congress to ensure that human embryos are not created for experimentation or grown for body parts, and that human life is never bought and sold as a commodity. (Applause.) America will continue to lead the world in medical research that is ambitious, aggressive, and always ethical."

"Because courts must always deliver impartial justice, judges have a duty to faithfully interpret the law, not legislate from the bench. (Applause.) As President, I have a constitutional responsibility to nominate men and women who understand the role of courts in our democracy, and are well-qualified to serve on the bench -- and I have done so. (Applause.) The Constitution also gives the Senate a responsibility: Every judicial nominee deserves an up or down vote. (Applause.)"


President's Statement on Terri Schiavo - March 17, 2005:
"The case of Terri Schiavo raises complex issues. Yet in instances like this one, where there are serious questions and substantial doubts, our society, our laws, and our courts should have a presumption in favor of life. Those who live at the mercy of others deserve our special care and concern. It should be our goal as a nation to build a culture of life, where all Americans are valued, welcomed, and protected - and that culture of life must extend to individuals with disabilities."


President Bush has always been straight up with his words.

Whether or not either Bush will be successful in saving Terri, this will only be the beginning, not the end, of the processes W has outlined.

Whether alive or a martyr, Terri will eventually be a major catalyst for the coming change(s) towards a culture of life.

I know it's difficult to be patient when there's such a tender life at stake, but patience, I think, is what we need.

May God's Will be done.


707 posted on 03/24/2005 9:11:06 AM PST by FRactional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mississippi red-neck

Your name makes me think of an approriate song...

What this world needs is a few more rednecks
Some people ain’t afraid to take a stand
What this world needs is a little more respect
For the Lord and the law and the workin’ man
We could use a little peace and satisfaction
Some good people up front to take the lead
A little less talk and a little more action
And a few more rednecks is what we need...


708 posted on 03/24/2005 9:11:19 AM PST by matymac (I'm saved...are you...?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]

To: ex 98C MI Dude
When the judiciary can have a disabled American put to death for no crime other than being unable to communicate clearly, we no longer have a Constitutional Republic. When the judiciary rules 'unconstitutional' any attempt to save that disabled American from starvation, then we no longer have representative government.

It is quite worrisome, isn't it? Common sense and G-d-given rights have been trampled on by Men in Black.

709 posted on 03/24/2005 9:11:20 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Maybe it's because he had used "cracker-jack" teams in his previous 4 attempts to obtain a favorable ruling?


710 posted on 03/24/2005 9:11:23 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
"The RCC does not prohibit cremation, nor does it prohibit autopsies."

Thank for the info MM.

711 posted on 03/24/2005 9:12:02 AM PST by sweet_diane ("Will I dance for you Jesus? Or in awe of You be still? I can only imagine..I can only imagine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

LOL


712 posted on 03/24/2005 9:12:14 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

I'm am so disgusted by this POS Michael, and so depressed that an innocent woman is under a death sentence, that I can't type my thoughts.

I'm just sitting here in a fog.


713 posted on 03/24/2005 9:12:26 AM PST by ColoCdn (Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Look, it's a tragedy, but what's at the core of it are some bad laws, laws that the Florida legislature refused to undo yesterday...not bad judiciary.

I diagree .. the courts threw out legislative law

714 posted on 03/24/2005 9:12:39 AM PST by Mo1 (Why can't the public see Terry - What are they afraid of ??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni

What does this case have to do with Federalism?


715 posted on 03/24/2005 9:12:49 AM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: FRactional
May God's Will be done.

Seems the feeding tube is what interrupted God's Will already.

716 posted on 03/24/2005 9:12:53 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Is adultery still a crime on the Florida law books?

Yes, it is. Obviously, it is not prosecuted. Dead letter law.

Michael Schiavo living in sin with another woman is morally outrageous, to be sure, but this apparently sways no courts. However, if it's actually ILLEGAL in Florida, then, this seems to be an obvious point of attack on his legal guardianship.

Why hasn't it been exploited? Can somebody who lives in Florida or has the right contacts, please do something about this?

717 posted on 03/24/2005 9:13:12 AM PST by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55; All
I have tried, with some limited success to stay out of this argument and to attempt to maintain a level of objectivity. That being said, I am curious about a hidden agenda on the part of the "Grieving" spouse (Michael) and the sleazebag lawyer (Felos). It has been stated repeatedly about how Michael has spent the money received from the original settlement et.al. and that he only has Terri's best interests in mind. Given that I work closely with severl attorney's, and that I find them to be the most sleazy lifeform on the planet, I am willing to bet that there is some action pending, relying on Terri's death that will uncouple some of the original judgement.

Inquiring minds want to know....

Is the original judgement sealed??? Since Michael settled for substantially less than the original amount, it leads me to believe that there may be a substantial amount in escrow contingent on Terri's death. In my experience, that would be a great motivating factor on the part of the shark (attorney).

With regards to the judges. Silly mortals, don't you know that once a LAWYER is awarded the coveted black robe, they are automatically imbued with "jedi-like" powers that sets them above us, the unwashed masses. Part of that is need to defend a fellow judge at all cost. (9th Circus is exempt of course, it is the comedy relief for the Judicial)

I am not surprised that one black robe covers for another black robe. It is the way of things. If (a big if) there is ever another civil war in the US, I am willing to bet that it is instigated by some issue from a judge.

Semper Disgusted

718 posted on 03/24/2005 9:13:41 AM PST by Trident/Delta ("Veni..Vedi..Velcro... I came, I saw, I stuck around......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

Never mind, I figured it out. The proper noun is "quoth," or rather cwað. It goes back to at least A.D. 1200. So that's the word that "purists" are defending against the Johnny-come-lately "quote." I can't keep up with this pre-Chaucerian Middle English, so I'll stick to the modern, if incorrect, usage.


719 posted on 03/24/2005 9:13:50 AM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I was curious about the "unanimous" decision. Normally doesn't the Justice (in this case Kennedy) make a decision as to whether to take it? Then it can go to three Justices? And only later to the full Court? I know I'm very fuzzy here, but does anyone know the procedural details?


720 posted on 03/24/2005 9:14:22 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 1,161-1,176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson