As I stated in my original question, I am not a lawyer, so citing XXX vs YYY as justification does not explain this to me, since I don't know the facts of the historical arguments. I am willing to listen to cogent argument based on undisputed facts. I have not seen this, nor am I in a position to be exposed to it, so I must make my stand based on what is presented to me.
Saying something is so, because someone else said it is so, does not present a case, and that is what everything after the second paragraph of your response in legalese says. I am giving you another opportunity, but you seem to be lacking any cogent response.
I am a lawyer, and that's why I am so frightened by the takeover by the courts, lawyers and legal system. I know a lot of these people and they are the LAST people you would want controlling life and death decisions. I would feel a great deal more comfortable with most of the folks on this site. The "system" has become a complete abstraction, manipulable by its players to further the desired political-social agenda. Nothing will really change until the executives and legislatures decide to take their power back. We might not have things our way then, but at least the power would be back in the hands of elected officials, and with regular opportunities to throw the b------ds out.
As I said before, what exactly do you want me to explain?