[ContemptofCourt]

As I said before, what exactly do you want me to explain?

[Magnum44]

I refer to my first post -

I sure would appreciate someone explaining in laymans terms how this is 1) legally, being permitted, considering the public information that is out there includes no living will on Terri's behalf, and 2) morally being tolerated by a medical profession sworn to the hippocratic oath.

If the judges are making the legally correct decision, explain it to us.

Now explain how a judge can subjectively come to a decision that deprives the God given right to life of an individual based on the facts in this case. Is that a clear enough question for you?