Sorry, but I'm not really sure what you want me to explain to you. Moreover, I fear that anything I do say that you disagree with will merely be dismissed as "legalistic crap."
As I stated in my original question, I am not a lawyer, so citing XXX vs YYY as justification does not explain this to me, since I don't know the facts of the historical arguments. I am willing to listen to cogent argument based on undisputed facts. I have not seen this, nor am I in a position to be exposed to it, so I must make my stand based on what is presented to me.
Saying something is so, because someone else said it is so, does not present a case, and that is what everything after the second paragraph of your response in legalese says. I am giving you another opportunity, but you seem to be lacking any cogent response.