To: AaronInCarolina
Hammesfahr was on Hannity last night he is a Nobel Prize nominee in the field of brain injuries and was not paid for his diagnosis according to what he said last night.
How can he not be credible?
To: northernlightsII
I know Sean said about 37 times that the guy is a "Nobel Prize nominee." What Sean didn't say is that the entire sum and substance of that claim is that a friend of Hammesfahr who is not a doctor or a scientist - he is a lawyer - sent a letter to the Nobel committee "nominating" Hammesfahr. Neither the Nobel committee nor anyone in the medical or scientific community has recognized Hammesfahr in this way.
If the guy - and commentators - feel the need to continually push this kind of crap credential, what does that indicate about the rest of what Hammesfahr has to say?
548 posted on
03/22/2005 8:32:23 AM PST by
lugsoul
(Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
To: northernlightsII
Hammesfahr was on Hannity last night he is a Nobel Prize nominee in the field of brain injuries and was not paid for his diagnosis according to what he said last night. How can he not be credible?
I don't know. I have read some about him. He uses some sort of technique with stroke victims that involves hyperbaric pressure that supposedly restores blood flow in the brain that he claims has had good success in some patients. I have read testimonials by some of the patients. Honestly, those who come onto these threads and makes unsubstantiated claims like "he's a whack job" and "he's not credible" really should seek to inform us just to why we should accept their claims.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson