Okay, someone please clarify about the "ruling." My understanding is that he has only, so far, ruled on a "motion" for injunctive relief and not the actual ruling on the case. Is that correct? If so... he is STILL holding out on making a determination.
Judge Whittemore also found that Schiavo's due process rights had been upheld throughout the litigation process.In the ruling, Whittemore said there were issues concerning the constitutionality of the law Congress passed over the weekend, but he presumed the act to be constitutional for the basis of the request for an injunction that would have ordered the feeding tube reconnected. Whittemore wrote that Schiavo's "life and liberty interests" were protected by the process of the Florida courts. He also found that a state court judge did not compromise the fairness of the proceeding or the impartiality of the court with his decision to allow the feeding tube to be removed. "Even under these difficult and time strained circumstances, however, and notwithstanding Congress' expressed interest in the welfare of Theresa Schiavo, this court is constrained to apply the law to the issues before it," the ruling reads.
From Fox News