[Military family member]

Excuse me if I'm wrong, but like it or not, Michael is the husband, and there is a legal precedence as to the utterance between a huband and wife. He may have broken his vows according to the church but that is a matter for the church.

[Boardwalk]

But what if HINO wasn't listening another time Terri expressed her wishes to live, perhaps while he was visiting with her in the hospice behind locked doors!

[syriacus]

He may have broken his vows according to the church but that is a matter for the church

Silly me.

I thought the civil government, not the church, issued the marriage license.

Maybe things are different in Pennsylvania

[UCANSEE2]

and there is a legal precedence as to the utterance between a huband and wife.

and there is a legal precedence against murdering your wife because she's inconvenient, even if she says KILL ME.

[northernlightsII]

Follow your own argument please, you are the one raising the sanctity of marriage which is a religious concept.
Second,there is no such thing as a legal precedence as to the utterance between a husband and wife.
Hearsay evidence is not admissible in court as a
rule unless it falls within one of the exceptions.
By the way,one of the exception is a statement against interest,which is exactly the opposite of the statement that Schiavo made. His statement was completely in his interest.

[atruelady]

No.

I will state again the words of Rushmore...

SHCIAVO'S HUSBAND'S RIGHTS DO NOT SUPERCEDE TERRI'S RIGHTS AS A HUMAN BEING!!!!!!!