Posted on 03/21/2005 2:14:45 PM PST by sonsofliberty2000
Just on Fox: Judge going back to chambers to review plaintiff (parents) request for restraining order and tube reinserted.
I think we've all waited long enough for this matter to be resolved.
WHO is Pro-Life - the new federal judge?
If that happens is there any way the ghouls can prevent the tube from being reinserted?
God you guys are too much.....Napalitano is saying what he thinks the decision may be.......not his own personal beliefs.......can't you tell the difference....the guy is hardly a liberal, my God.
I don't think a judge moves this slowly on emergency injunctive relief to insert a feeding tube. I am very pessimistic.
Napolitano was chosen by Fox for his telegenic presence not his knowledge of the law. He was a N.J. Superior court judge. A step up from municipal court judge but certainly not in the ranks of a U.S. District Court judge. Given the patronage system at play in N.J., one suspects legal acumen had very little to due with his ability to become a 'judge.'
I heard earlier that there was another appeal ready to file with another (higher) federal court, I think in Atlanta, in just this eventuality.
Seems to me something like this happened in Bush v. Gore.
But whatever, we know we can't rely on the corrupt judiciary. THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE MUST ACT.
What apparently happened, and I am just guessing, from the title and the follow up, is that:
1. Judge refuses to hear case, and refuses to rule for tube reinsertion.
2. After this, Parents go in with emergency request, to reinsert the tube, because they intend to appeal and if Terri isn't going to get hydrated and fed NOW, she won't live, or be "past the point of no return", by the time they go and have their appeal heard by the 11th Circuit Appeals Court.
This will be one of the steep prices we pay for the confirmation of so many of Clinton's judges. You know that none of them are defenders of the Constitution. And yet the wrangling about Bush's judicial nominations goes on......
Hammesfahr is on Hannity and Colmes tonight -- listen to what he has to say!
On what basis?
Good point. My uncle was in a nursing home for a couple of years, unable to recognize anybody or get out of bed. According to the Florida judge, I guess we should have pressed a pillow over his face once he stopped feeding himself and got it over with.
You should hear Mark Levin rip Napolitano to shreds on Levin's radio show (WABC, New York).
well I would hope any judge makes a finding on the law and not his own personal beliefs.....don't you......I mean his beliefs may influence part of his decision but I would hope that he follows the law.......if I ever end up in court, and I get a Dem. judge, I hope he renders his findings without prejudice to my views
Dear Lord, why is this taking so long? A human being in starving!
One way or the other, this case has the POTENTIAL (if acted on correctly by Congress) to be a lightning rod/kick in the a-- for our guys to actually DO SOMETHING about the out of control judiciary.
Whether they act on it or not is a whole 'nother matter..
kind of got that Eddie Munster look going on
USC 14th Amendment Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Does Michael's hearsay about Terri's "wishes" constitute "due process"? The hearsay he remembered after the $1.2M settlement - years after Terri's "heart attack"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.