Posted on 03/11/2005 6:32:41 PM PST by Sola Veritas
That sounds so nasty when you say it, but you want to deny women the right to have an abortion if they are raped or dying or screwed by their daddy.
No one said they would vote for Hillary. But if the Republicans nominate Condi, and she is "mildly pro-choice," we will regretfully vote for a third-party candidate or not vote at all.
And so will several million other pro-lifers who gave Bush their votes last November.
This is NOT an issue we will, or can, compromise on. If conservatives with more libertarian views want to see a conservtive in the White House, then they will have to compromise on this issue.
I'm referring to the 'War on Babies'...
But now that you mention "Bush," he's not fighting the 'War on Illegals Invaders' very well, is he?
I agree with his opinion...you threw out the race card .. digusting.
Here's the Kerry article regarding his position on abortion:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1166881/posts
Yes! Yes! One thing she won't have is all those "handlers" and "hangeroners!"
plus pro-war would also be pro-murder........it just doesn't work out that easily does it?......this issue creates havoc.......
There is one group on this forum I cannot abide, ill informed, ignorant pretend conservatives, like you.
What effect has Bush's position on abortion had?
He can't even get his lesser nominees out of commitee...
First of all we want a candidate who does not believe the slaughter of the innocents has real advantages.
If we can get beyond that one, other issues can be discussed of course.
The reality is what it is, and no amount of parsing changes it...
If Roe V.Wade is ever overturned...isn't that what will happen?
You don't know me from crap. You all are just throwing out accusations.
I will pray you do not. I will try to talk with you about it if you will listen. But I will neither force you to have one nor forceably prevent you from having one.
So much for Congo Lisa! We've had all the pro death presidents that we can handle.
collateral damage?
I don't know you at all, but I read your comment in Post #7 and there's NO WAY it sounded racist or like you were throwing out the race card.
It's a charge that people pull lately if you even MENTION the obvious.
"But if the Republicans nominate Condi, and she is "mildly pro-choice," we will regretfully vote for a third-party candidate or not vote at all. And so will several million other pro-lifers who gave Bush their votes last November."
That will only serve to marginalize your influence in the party. We don't need you as much as you think we do.
LOL
Stay away from my children...
I like Condi Rice. I like her a lot. But that does not square with my desire to work to elect a prolife candidate. Ms.Rice, I am sure is qualified to be president, but I need to know her view on the capricious killing of the unborn. If it is identical to H.Clinton, the difference in economic,military,other social matters simply do not rise to the necessary height to separate her from Hillary. I need more information, but if Condi Rice is a proabortion candidate, I will be looking for a prolife candidate. There are those on this thread who believe people who want infants to have a chance to live are Nuts, as you say. You will decide for yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.